
Psychotropics and Youth, Part 2 – The Solutions

“Prescribed psychotropic medications are now high on the research agenda,” assert Lakhan and Hagger-Johnson. Their study advocates new approaches to research to address the rising concern over dramatic increases in psychotropic prescriptions for both children and young.
Our first post delineated the five erroneous myths often adhered to when prescribing youth’s psychotropic medication. Here are the three areas of recommended research to address this “alarming” problem.
1) Clarify child/adult differences for psychotropics. The future promises to see questionnaires and interviews tailored specifically to children and adolescents. Prominent will be the initiation of normative data for youth mental disorders. Studies will need to focus on specific age groups, disorders and treatments.
2) Attend to the growth of “cosmetic” use of psychotropics in children and adolescents. Researchers’ alarm over the marked increase in psychotropic prescriptions for youth has spilled over into the public arena. Recent media attention, in conjunction with changes in clinical practice standards and drug product labeling, has juggernauted psychotropic investigation to the forefront of the research agenda.
3) Address concerns about the diagnostic validity of mental illness in the current DSM classification system. Due to lack of psychotropic research on youth, the current DSM system is flawed, Lakhan and Hagger-Johnson noted. Ethical challenges such as reluctance to enroll children in psychotropic clinical trials and the lack of “well-designed”, placebo-controlled trials have traditionally been barriers to effective research. Increasingly, the idea of hands-on research with children is more palatable.
Lakhan and Haggar-Johnson remind us that “for the first time, we can begin to record and measure, rather than assume, the impact of prescribed psychotropics on children and adolescents.” The final verdict — children and adolescents need accurate, age-appropriate data that does not exist today.
Reference
Lakhan, S., & Hagger-Johnson, G. (2007). The impact of prescribed psychotropics on youth Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health, 3 (1) DOI: 10.1186/1745-0179-3-21
7 Responses
[...] this grave problem. However, debate is continuing to grow about the over-reliance of psychotropics. In my next post, I will identify three areas of research that can provide answers to this alarming [...]
[...] 2010 ? 3 ? 10 ? ???? ???????? ???? Psychotropics and Youth, Part 2 – The Solutions | Brain Blogger “Prescribed psychotropic medications are now high on the research agenda,” assert [...]
[...] teachers involved in the study’s answer to this dilemma? They want more training in the area of child psychopharmacology and more collaboration with parents and physicians who prescribe the medication, which at present [...]
Leave a Reply
Popular Posts
- Goal Setting - Pitfalls and Benefits
- Why Some Human Brains Become Leaders, While Others Followers?
- Clinical Psychologists' Perceptions of Persons with Mental Illness
- Exercise - It Works For Depression
- Deep Brain Stimulation - A New Frontier in Psychiatry
- Pulling The Plug Too Soon?
- Psychotropics and Youth, Part 3 - Equip Teachers with Prescription Pads?
- Antidepressants Not Effective for Some Types of Depression
- Mind your Immune System
- Light at the End of the Tunnel or Too Much Carbon Dioxide?
- Cults and Terrorism, Part 1 - The Problem of Definition
- Societal Assumptions on Abuse and the Victim's Perspective
- My Nephew and his Brain, Part 4 - Their Life Today
Future Posts
Latest Posts
- When Bipolar Patients Abuse Drugs – The Dual Diagnosis Dilemma
- Peace and Conflict, Part 3 – Conflict Resolution
- Addicted to Love
- Cheers to a Decreased Risk of Arthritis
- Breaking Up is Not So Hard to Do
- It Takes a Village to Prevent Obesity
- Peace and Conflict, Part 2 – The Role of Religion
- Social Interaction at the Work Place – A Case Study Analysis
- Drugs for Bulimia
- Violent Video Games as a Learning Tool
Comments
- NosmoKING: Should we still have to take a
- michael: It is up to people to spend th
- Michele: But my argument with this arti
- Chelee Bean: But my argument with this arti
- Chelee Bean: Yep, valid point.
- René: I'd have loved to disagree wit
- sean: hi i am 41 now but had a mva
- suny nomi: online forex trading a best bu
- Evan: Thanks Isabella, I like the no
- Guy Macher: Ottawa Citizen Newspaper 26 Au
- Shade: well santas always been fat an
- Ken Weiss: Your quote that fighting obesi
Life insurance, San Francisco Doctor, Best vitamins supplements, Online Criminal Justice Degrees , alcohol rehab , Tattoo , Retractable Banner Stands , Medicines and Biotech Products , Breast Cancer Stages , Buy Plavix , Cystic Fibrosis Signs Symptoms , Pancreatic Cancer Treatment , Pet Insurance , Colon Cancer Treatment , Edgepark Medical , Mattress , iPhone 3GS Accessories , Astrology compatibility.









Interesting piece. The third point really struck me. So the medical establishment believes its unethical to test these drugs on children — yet it’s all right to prescribe them willy-nilly without testing? Hello, people! — don’t we see a problem here?
Dear Bill,
I wrote on this issue for The Lancet Student last year:
You can read the full article here. I would like to know the public’s opinion on traditional clinical trials or using virtual models for testing medications on pediatric patients. Thank you.
Sincerely,
Shaheen
I agree Bill. They’d like to test children if society allowed it, but it’s not “in vogue” in the public sphere right now. You make a good point.
Thank you for your comments, Shaheen. Your article was quite interesting and your point astute. We should be well past the point where people recognize that children are not little adults, and be on a path to matching treatment to the specific ages and characteristics of the children involved. One-size-fits-all should never be a recipe for medical treatment of our children.