
Medicine and the Law – Part 5: Abandonment
Continuing on in our series we will now talk about abandonment and terminating the physician-patient relationship. We’ve previously talked about the contract and consent. Then we moved on to medical malpractice and causation. Finally we discussed informed consent. Now we move on to abandonment.
Abandonment is the concept whereby a physician terminates the physician-patient relationship without reasonable notice at a time when the patient still has need of medical attention. This typically is prevented by giving the patient adequate time to find a replacement physician, planning for adequate post-procedure follow up, and giving the patient adequate instruction for care when the patient is not in the presence of the physician.
Abandonment typically only comes up when a physician is treating an undesirable patient or a patient that he or she simply no longer wishes to take care of. This may be for financial reasons or simply because the patient has disease that is too complicated for the physician to take care of. It may also occur because the patient is not adherent to the doctor’s recommendations and thus the doctor notifies the patient that he plans on terminating the relationship if the patient will not follow instructions. Most often, the physician will write a formal letter to the patient so there is record of the severance. The main concept is that there must be a chain of continuous medical care that cannot be broken.
If a doctor prematurely discharges a patient or discharges a patient from the hospital without adequate follow up instructions he could be found to have abandoned the patient. If the doctor notifies a patient that he is closing his practice or moving to another location, he must allow adequate time for the patient to find another doctor. He may even refer all of his patients to another doctor to prevent any claims of abandonment.
When a patient is abandoned, lawyers typically only get involved if there were damages caused by the abandonment. However, if the physician shows that good faith efforts were made to treat the patient and the patient was simply lost to follow up, he is not liable.
I will address the ethics of severing the physician-patient relationship in another article.
Popular Posts
- The Love Drug
- Women After Sex
- Fatty Acids and Suicide Risk
- Mind Games - Science's Attempts at Thought Control
- Risks of Personalized Medicine
- Mental Health Disorders Prevalent Among Youth Worldwide
- Is Giftedness Nothing More than Good Genes?
- The Many Emerging Roles of Astrocytes
- Behind the Masks - The Mysteries of Dissociative Identity Disorder
- The NeuroSocial Network
Future Posts
- The Brain’s Buying Power
Latest Posts
- Aging Intelligently
- A Nicotine Patch a Day Keeps the Cognitive Impairment Away
- The Many Emerging Roles of Astrocytes
- Diabetes Impairs Cognition
- Media Violence Leads to Real Violence
- Intelligence – Are You Holding Back Your Brain?
- Childhood Aggression Predicts Health Care Use Later in Life
- The Brain’s Border Patrol – Blood Brain Barrier
- Risks of Personalized Medicine
- BED-head and Obesity – Food for Thought
Comments
- peter: I also see things the same way
- Scapadas Amorosas: Lets patent it, package, marke
- Emily Haines, MSc, PhD student: Thanks for your comments, Matt
- Emily Haines, MSc, PhD student: Thanks for your comments and s
- Alex: While we have our eyes glued t
- Richard Kensinger, MSW: Carla,You are absolutely c
- Soraya L. Valles: I'm interested in astrocytes.
- Raymond Tallis: Dear Kitty, I have come to you
- Steven: After smoking for 17 years dai
- Matt: I'm just interested in hearing
- Carla Easley: If everyone adopted the "Growt
- Isabel (retired RN): I second that query for resear









1 Response
[...] lots of topics including contract and consent, malpractice, causation, informed consent, and abandonment. Now we will talk about third-party [...]