Health & Healthcare
Medicine and the Law – Part 4: Informed Consent
In my previous posts about Medicine and the Law we talked about the elements necessary for a patient-physician relationship — contract and consent as well as medical malpractice. We then went on to discuss causation and the different types. Continuing on in this series let’s talk about informed consent. Failure to obtain informed consent is a leading cause of malpractice claim.
Informed consent essentially is documented written or verbal permission from a patient to receive treatment or undergo a procedure. Typically it involves five elements:
- A description of the illness
- A description of the treatment
- Risks of the treatment
- Alternatives to the treatment
- Risks of not having any treatment
Physicians can get into trouble in many scenarios regarding informed consent. Most states require that informed consent be verified by a witnessing party. Thus an informed consent form typically has three signatures — the patient, the doctor, and the witness. If a patient is unable to sign, verbal consent can be obtained or his/her healthcare power of attorney may sign. If there is no family or healthcare power of attorney and the procedure or treatment is emergent then a two-physician consent may be done. This basically is permission granted by the state to care for a patient in an emergent situation according to the standard of care.
When a patient is demented or cannot comprehend any of the requirements for informed consent, then things can get a little dicey. Often times the treating physician will obtain a psychiatric consultation to evaluate the patient’s decision making capacity. If that consultant still cannot determine the patient’s decision making capacity, he may obtain an additional consultation.
As you can imagine, getting permission from a patient who may or may not completely know what is going on is a recipe for disaster. As a treating physician this is an area where you may get in trouble if you are aggressive and treat or if you are conservative and do not treat. Ultimately it is the outcome that gets you in trouble given that most patients who sue are those who have a bad outcome.
5 Comments/Trackbacks
What is important for informed consent is a dialogue that is built up between patient (and/or guardian) and doctor. Simply presenting the information about the risks and benefits is not enough, the doctor must ensure that the patient actualy understands what it means and isn’t entering into the agreement under coercive or manipulative pressure. This puts a burden of trust onto the doctor, because the doctor obviously will know more about the procedure than the patient (most of the time), to tailor his or her description and discussion of the procedure for the understanding level of the patient, to discuss and explain the risks and benefits to the best of his or her ability, and to answer questions without bias or coercive pressure (one of the problems with pharmaceutical companies buttering up doctors can manifest here).
Informed consent isn’t just about getting the form signed. It’s about a transaction of information between a doctor and a patient in order to establish the understanding of the process of a procedure or medical treatment, whether it is the appropriate procedure or treatment, and then to allow the patient to waive their expectations of normal behaviour in order for a doctor to provide a procedure or treatment (such as invasive or painful treatments).
The part that “gets doctors into trouble” is not establishing a good communicative dialogue with the patient. Communication is *essential* to informed consent.
I completely agree with Catherine.
There’s a tendency to reduce informed consent to a set of forms with boxes to tick and dotted lines to sign along. But that’s not informed consent. I’m sure it’s necessary for medicolegal purposes to complete a relevant set of documents and forms, but, really, what’s much more important is that the patient and the practitioner have formed a trusting relationship.
If the doctor really cares about the patient, he, or she, will do their best to help the patient to make a choice. Not just any choice, and not necessarily the choice the doctors would make for themselves, but the choice only the patient can make in the full knowledge of the contexts and values of their life.
The doctor’s job involves being well informed about diseases and treatments and making that knowledge available to the patient.
Informed consent is not persuading a patient to do what the doctor thinks is best. It’s empowering and enabling a patient to make their choice.
Trackbacks
- Jul 02, 2008 | Going Beyond Informed Consent | Brain Blogger
- Jul 27, 2008 | Medicine and the Law - Part 5: Abandonment | Brain Blogger
Leave a Reply
Tuesday, February 9, 2010
- Religion - A "Natural" Phenomenon?
- Creating an Artificial Brain
- How Culture Shapes Our Mind and Brain
- Sex, Violence and The Male Warrior Hypothesis
- The Secret to Good Health – Listen to the Data
- If Herbal Medicine is Medicine, Shouldn't it be Treated as Such?
- Too Much Information?
- Swine Flu - A Lose-Lose Situation for Public Health Authorities
- Logging On for Psychotherapy
- The Neural Basis of the Self
- Income Inequality and Health Outcomes
- Ginkgo Biloba Ineffective... Again
- The Evolution of Depression
- Post-Partum Psychosis - Rare but Real
- Worried Well on the Web
- Is Your Doctor Happy or Burnt-Out?
- Journal Retracts Autism Research
- How Young is Too Young to Diagnose Depression?
- In Sickness and Mental Health
- Health Insurance for All - A Weighty Issue
- “I Feel Your Pain” – The Neural Basis of Empathy
- Speaking in Tongues – A Neural Snapshot
- Neuro Case 1 – Using Transcranial Doppler for Basilar Artery Occlusion
- Journal Retracts Autism Research
- Crossing the Line from Physician to Journalist
- Ginkgo Biloba Ineffective… Again
- The Smart Ones are Living Longer
- Too Much Information?
- Drugs and Pharmacology, Nineteenth Edition
- Coping with Trauma – Lessons from Resilient Individuals
- Worried Well on the Web
- Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Neuroscience Conferences for 2010
- One Puff Forward, Two Pounds Back
- Income Inequality and Health Outcomes
- Farewell 2009, Welcome 2010
- When the Drugs Don’t Work, or Just Make it Worse
- Is a Slim Santa Claus Coming to Town?
- Stimulants May Offer Protection in ADHD
- Sex, Violence and The Male Warrior Hypothesis
- Is Time on Your Side?
- We all get depressed every now and then. It's part of life. Sometimes you feel g...
- it will take many test to prove whether gingko biloba is effective..but for now ...
- i do not know which Australlia you are talking abiuy. My impression about this c...
- The Institute of Natural Excellence has a new way to look at this and many other...
- My guessI expect that in their childhood...free flowing care free ...
- its the mind game when it comes to good healthy survival. better iq means better...
- the ability of brain to store information, regarding different languages while c...
- 12 children were taken as subjects for a very controversial research , the resu...
- Below is how and why the Swine flu was Genetically Engineered. For full version...
- Having worked with developmentally disabled persons for 17 years, I see many par...
- Great job. I've posted a link to here from the ...
- Yeah... I don't buy it. Know why? Because rotund Santa was around for many gener...
- For those unfamiliar with Dr. John Cannell's Vitamin D Theory of Autism see the...
- It is a pity that very little coverage of this issue names the journalist who is...
- I would like to see some research into what Ginkgo biloba does do instead of wha...
- It is easier for us to ignore the problem than really attack the problem, due to...
- I was going by Alan MacFarlane's description of Hunter Gatherer societies.( les...
- Javaid, where on earth do you get the idea that hunter-gatherers have little or ...
- This is my angle ..Hunter Gatherers have the lightest density footprint and ...
- yes , i really like it. isuggest everyone to be fit and healthy....
Sponsored Links
Diet and Health Supplements, Best vitamins supplements, Brain Fitness DVD, Home Care, Alcohol Rehab, Emergency Lighting, Online Criminal Justice Degrees, Tattoo, Health Insurance, Wireless Phone Accessories , Financial Tips , Banner Stands , Kids Furniture , Biotherapeutic Product Information , Breast Cancer Stages , Myoflex Extra , Cystic Fibrosis Symptoms , Pancreas Cancer , Dallas health insurance , Hand and Finger , Affordable Health Insurance , Lung Cancer Treatment , Plano personal injury attorney , What Is Human Papilloma Virus (hpv)? , Edgepark Medical , Hydroxycut, Astrology compatibility.
Neuroscience & Neurology
February 09, 2010 | 1 Comment | By Meghan Meyer, PhD student
“I Feel Your Pain” – The Neural Basis of Empathy
More In Neuroscience & Neurology
- Speaking in Tongues – A Neural Snapshot
- Neuro Case 1 – Using Transcranial Doppler for Basilar Artery Occlusion
- Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Neuroscience Conferences for 2010
- Are Physicians Spending Too Much Time Diagnosing Patients?
- Two Wrongs Make a Right – Abnormal Brain Circuitry May Stop Abnormal Movement
Neuroscience & Neurology
Opinion
February 01, 2010 | 0 Comments | By Jennifer Gibson, PharmD
Crossing the Line from Physician to Journalist
More In Opinion
- Sex, Violence and The Male Warrior Hypothesis
- Bruxism and the Brain
- Religion – A “Natural” Phenomenon?
- Natural Good, Chemical Bad – Right?
- Time for a Change – Gender Reassignment
Opinion
Psychiatry & Psychology
February 03, 2010 | 5 Comments | By Jennifer Gibson, PharmD
Journal Retracts Autism Research
More In Psychiatry & Psychology
- White Bears – The Paradox of Mental Suppression
- Sugar and Spice and Everything Nice?
- The Evolution of Depression
- Why So Serious About The Self?
- New Report on the Use of Antidepressants During Pregnancy


Wonderful Blog. According to me,Medicine and law is used according to patient health conditions not beyond this. But you have provided us with great information. I would be grateful if you go for medicine for some more information.