Articles & Studies
Anti-Smoking Campaign Doesn’t Mess Around
It looks like the heavy guns are out. It’s been decades since the dangers associated with smoking have been realized and revealed. Yet there’s still a fair number of smokers out there.
A few years ago our hometown of Austin banned smoking in public places. This was a huge issue and I clearly remember my husband and I angrily (or I was angry at least) spouting off against each other. Just to note, he’s not a smoker but he was taking the viewpoint of a business owner or, as he’s prone to do, playing devil’s advocate. Once I became aware of Austin’s new guidelines, I started noticing that this wasn’t a random piece of legislation: cities across the globe started issuing their own smoking ban. In fact, even though these smoking bans are relatively new and aren’t found everywhere, I sometimes think of a cigarette as I do a video cassette — an artifact whose time has come and most certainly gone.
Of course I’m totally wrong. I happen to have pretty straight-laced friends who, like myself, are constantly surrounded by kids. A margarita here and there are about as dangerous as we get when it comes to having a good time. In other words we’ve nixed smoking habits and social smoking. But that’s my small world. According to The National Cancer Institute, 20.8% of adults in the United States smoked cigarettes in 2006. The percentages are greater for teens. So the problem remains.
Now some may question my wording… the problem remains. I understand that some don’t consider smoking to be a problem but when, according to NCI statistics, 38,000 deaths are caused by second-hand smoke, I think problem is the correct term to use. After all, a casual puff to you may be somebody else’s funeral.
Considering the still current dangers of smoking, I was intrigued by anti-smoking efforts from Brazil. According to Brazil adopts stronger pictures on cigarette packets in anti-smoking campaign, an article in BMJ, this country is attempting to lower smoking rates by appealing to smokers’ emotions.
Since 2001, Brazil has placed emotion-evoking pictures on cigarette boxes. Recently they upped the ante by using pictures that were found to be more powerful than the previous pictures.
Not sure what to expect, I took a look at the pictures. Now, the text is in Portuguese so I could only make out a few words in the captions but, even without words, the pictures were hard to swallow. There’s a range of images, from a curled up premature baby to a child standing over his father’s (presumably) sick bed to lungs full of cigarettes. Even to me, the images are powerful… and I’m not even trying to ignore them long enough to light up another one.
Pictures are available from Brazil’s Instituto Nacional de Cancer.
Reference
Morales, K. (2008). Brazil adopts stronger pictures on cigarette packets in antismoking campaign. BMJ, 336(7657), 1333-1333. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.39608.374340.DB
Related Articles
23 Comments/Trackbacks
Joe Camel
Anonymous
The brutal facts are that smoking is NOT a right but a personal habit.
Other personal habits are spitting, picking your nose, masturbating, and biting your nails. All these are things you may wish to do in private, but not around other people.
You do NOT have any “right” to impose these personal habits on others, or expect others to endure them, or expect others to pay the costs you impose on yourself.
Further, those personal habits are more natural. Smoking is NOT natural. No baby is born with a proclivity to smoke. Lighting up that first cigarette was a free choice of every addict, and it was a very foolish choice. All the consequences of the smoker’s folly should be born by the smoker, not imposed on the rest of us.
Crusaders say a thing that you know isn’t true, in the hope that if you keep on saying it long enough, it will be true.
The objection to ‘Crusaders’ is not that they try to make us think as they do, but that they try to make us do as they think!
38,000 deaths are caused by second-hand smoke??
That is an out and out lie.
If that was the case I am sure they must be able to produce names and death certificates that state.’This person died from second-hand smoke.
No one on this planet ever got cancer or died solely from second-hand smoke.
Http://smokersclubinc.com
http://pasan.thetruthisalie.com
boyrock
My I see the pro-tobacco group have left a few comments – wonder if they also work for the ID lobby? They seem to have the same tactic – “how could we possibly be wrong”? In fact it appears that “Snowbird” makes this argument – just for the pro-tobacco group.
What I think is funny is that if you suggested we also legalise Marijuana they would be horrified – yet it is not really that different.
For me I live in a place that banned smoking in ANY public place some time back – bars, clubs, etc… its so much nicer to go out and NOT be subjected to someone else’s addiction.
boyrock
this is a good cross link http://scicurious.wordpress.com/2008/07/01/a-vaccine-against-nicotine-for-smoking-cessation/
“That said, nicotine as a drug is no laughing matter. Aside from the cancers, emphysema, and heart problems associated with long term smoking, nicotine is one of the most addictive drugs out there. It may not have the dramatic addictive effects associated with heroin or meth, but analyzed as number of reinforcements per dose, nicotine averages a whopping ten reinforcements (puffs) per cigarette (that’s average). And the percentage of people who will try nicotine is far higher than any other drug except alcohol. “
It is my ‘right’ to use a legal product
A smoking bans means..It is against the law to use or permit a legal product on ‘private’ property.
Is this the American Way??
The owner has the right to use or permit a legal product on his property.
The customer has the ‘right’ to not enter his venue.
Choices is the name of the game in America
TiredOfLyingNanniess
I had to laugh at the poster who doesn’t want to be subjected to someone addiction when he walks into a bar. Do you think you are walking into a Sunday school ice cream social where near beer and Shirley Temples are a little too frisky?
Right……alcohol is just water. Indeed. You never see addicted people in bars when the smokers are gone….right.
Lay some more wisdom on me ding-a-ling.
Drink just a teeny teeny bit too much of this “water” and see if a cop agrees with you when you beg him to not have to walk the line.
Bar are not health spas.
Nannies can stay out. They do anyway whether or not smoking is going on inside or not.
The few nannies out there that actually do walk into these places once in a blue moon can’t sustain these bars’ businesses for long.
TiredOfLyingNannies
The pharma shill pushing the nic vaccine…..
What is this post-Chantix snake oil…already??
Just ask the FAA what they think about Chantix use among their employees.
History Buff
It is NOT hard to see who the writer is tied to. The RWJF money that bought negative studies and bought the bans with millions of dollars in GRANTS, goes far.
I have to ask:
Since tobacco is in the same FOOD group as broccoli, tomato, potato, green pepper and other foods, ALL containing nicotine, do you have any insight as to when those foods will also be put on the ban list and also outlawed 25 feet from any door? I gather many restaurants had best get prepared.
mandyv
Anonymous, I believe all those other personal habits people have, are not subject to legalised “theft” tax though.
I also have to ask myself, are these the words of sane men, or dictators, tolerance is a wonderful thing.
http://www.smokersclubinc.com/Page/6100.html
Weyco and Banzhaf
Do you smoke-haters force others to breath in your noxious, carcinogenic perfumes,after-shave and deodrants, in the so called clean air experiment?
Not that I would want them banned!
http://www.ourlittleplace.com/chemicals.html
3. BENZYL ACETATE (in: perfume, cologne, shampoo, fabric softener, stickup air freshener, dishwashing liquid and detergent, soap, hairspray, bleach, after shave, deodorants)
Carcinogenic (linked to pancreatic cancer); “From vapors: irritating to eyes and respiratory passages, exciting cough.” “In mice: hyperanemia of the lungs.” “Can be absorbed through the skin causing systemic effects.” “Do not flush to sewer.”
freedom2choose.info for tolerant non-smokers and smokers alike, please come and join us.
forces.org for those who have not been brainwashed and still have open minds
My father passed away from bladder cancer caused by secondhand smoke. The 38,000 is actually a low number. 3000 are diagnosed with lung cancer caused by secondhand smoke and 50,000 from heart disease. The carbon monxide in smoke is deadly to someone prone to heart disease.
The components of the sidestream smoke coming off the tip of the cigarette are formed at a lower temperature, since oxygen is not being pulled through it, so more cancer causing substances are created at this lower temperature. The smoke is also not being filtered by either the cigarettes filter, nor the smokers body. Compare the color of the smoke coming out a smokers mouth and the color of the smoke coming off the tip of the cigarette–you can see the difference.
For free tips on how to help a loved one quit or to quit yourself, visit: http://www.StopSmokingStayQuit.blogspot.com
VJ Sleight
Queen of Quitting
I think those people who want to smoke can smoke lonely,then other people can not be second-smoking. This is the idea of mine.
———————————————————————————————————————————————-
http://www.niceadorn.com/sort.asp?big_id=8&sort_id=143
Tom
No one on this planet ever got cancer solely from second-hand smoke.
Richard Eis
The smoke stinks.
It turns everything yellow.
It makes it dificult to breath when it fills the room and anyone who thinks that breathing in ash and chemicals into their lungs is not hurting them needs a reality check.
Just because the government is trying help doesn’t mean that it must be wrong and we are heading towards a nanny state. And quite frankly when you need to be sucking on something all day to keep you happy, perhaps a nanny state is exactly appropriate for you.
virgilk
Are you worried about your right to breath clean air? I wouldn’t mind a little of it myself. I have yet to find anyone who can find it.
It’s not in your homes because of the materials it’s built from.
It’s not in your own Kitchen because of cleaning products.
It’s not in your yard because of the insecticides you spray.
It’s not in your car because of the materials used in the upholstery and the fumes that come into your car while driving.
It won’t be anywhere outside because of the pollution due to gas/diesel engines.
Look up Burning Issues and see the chart. Be sure to notice the least harmful item on the list. http://www.burningissues.org/comp-emmis-part-sources.htm
Ignore the fact that the EPA Report was vacated as fraudulent.
Ignore over 150+ studies that show no harm from SHS.
They don’t tell us that living close to major traffic hi-ways or large Urban areas increase the incidence of Cancer or Heart Disease by 50% or more.
Ignore the businesses going broke across the Country because of Bans.
What we do have, are agencies using misinformation to control others for profit not health.
TFK is just another so-called Non-Profit to throw money into. I always thought Non-Profits were supposed to stay out of advocacy in politics or loose their Non-Profit status. It’s an easy way to keep a six figure income for those who can’t hold a real job. The same goes for the other Non-Profits like the ACS, ALA etc.
Tom
Second hand smoke kills…WOW
I wonder how many dead bodys they will find when all those people in California breathes all that smoke from those nasty fires??
Stevo
“My father passed away from bladder cancer caused by secondhand smoke. ”
The medical profession are using passive smoking as a cause of a whole range of diseases that they are unwilling or unable to identify the cause of. The truth is many of these diseases are genetically related because we have not been allowing evolution to take its natural path.
BGoodman
Remember, you are a free people.
Just don’t forget, YOU HAVE NO RIGHTS, EXCEPT WHAT WE CHOOSE TO GIVE YOU.
drogan
VJ Sleight,“My father passed away from bladder cancer caused by secondhand smoke. ” Mom must have been blowin smoke into what??
Trackbacks
- Jul 14, 2008 | Carnival of Family Life | Colloquium
Leave a Reply
Friday, July 3, 2009
- Marijuana Withdrawal Syndrome
- Autism - No Need For A Cure?
- Are Humans Hard-Wired to Torture?
- Free Will and the Philosophy of Science
- Therapy and Medication - Where's the Breaking News?
- Emotions and the Brain
- Clearing the Haze - Is Marijuana Addictive?
- How Many Babies Is Too Many?
- Is Sugar the New Cocaine?
- What is Free Will?
- Reflections on Plasticity
- Recent Drug Warnings About Suicide
- Lithium as a Neuroprotectant?
- Logistical Barriers to Stem Cell Research
- Transparency in the Pharmaceutical Industry
- Topical Morphine - An Experimental Approach to Chronic Pain
- Be a Doctor! The Hours are Great!
- Time for a Change - Gender Reassignment
- Is Obesity Contagious?
- The Hidden Dangers of Soy
- Why Do Schizophrenics Smoke Cigarettes?
- Prevention of Adolescent Depression
- Drugs and Pharmacology, Sixteenth Edition
- Get By With a Little Help From Your Friends
- Communication is Key to Appropriate Antibiotic Use
- Time for a Change – Gender Reassignment
- Common Treatment Ineffective for Autism
- Marijuana Withdrawal Syndrome
- NSAIDs – Prevention or Just Delay of Dementia?
- What is Proprioception?
- Who Should Decide the Survivability of Newborns?
- Reflections on Plasticity
- Death and Dying in Tough Economic Times
- Medicate or Educate? – Just Pop a Polypill
- Dressing for Success? – the White Coat Dilemma
- What is Free Will?
- Clearing the Haze – Is Marijuana Addictive?
- Migraine Uncovered – Interview with Dr. Cady, Headache Expert
- Brain Blogging, Forty-Fifth Edition
- Barriers to Emergency Contraception
- Low blood sugar and high caffeine intake are also characteristic of many active ...
- As, I had a short 4-day trip to the mental hospital I can attest, almost all of ...
- How dare you tell me I experience no withdrawals? Who are you and what makes yo...
- Neither profession is more important than the other. I say this as a practicing ...
- I would imagine, to you....
- "You are also profiteering off of those who are “addicted,” and there’s usually ...
- I have been THC free for many years (after many years of daily use) and never ex...
- Please take a look at this article and see that we paranoid pro-pot-people have ...
- Bryan,
Thanks for sharing your thoughts. If you are equating food or exercise ...
- Samantha, you're in a ridiculous state of denial about marijuana addiction. I wa...
- From my own experience it is very important to look into hormone disturbances. I...
- Hello, I am not at all opposed to the idea that marijuana can be addictive for s...
- I agree with Joseph's comment and many of the points that Samantha makes as well...
- Plasticity just makes me happy. You should read or hear what the program all in ...
- Great post, I have been studying depression also. But I took another approach.
...
- Cognative behavioral therapy for some adolescents in a productive enviornment wi...
- Not BS!!!!! I'm 24 years old and I never smoked Marijuana more than twice a year...
- The author is certainly taking a beating from those who seem a little defensive ...
- I left the personal anecdotes for last in a 3-part series, intending them to ser...
- There are some thoughtful and some not-so-thoughtful comments here. The article ...
Brain Blogger's Historical Brain Illustrations









Sponsored Links
Home Care, Legitimate Online Jobs, Alcohol Rehab, Emergency Lighting, Online Criminal Justice Degrees, Tattoo, Health Insurance, Free Resume Analysis , Buy Home , Electronic Accessory , About Credit Reports , About Card Printing , About Trade Show Displays , Rheumatoid Arthritis Medication , Scalp Treatment , About chelation therapy , About Garments , WellPath South Carolina , Teeth Whitening Toothpaste , Hydroxycut, Astrology compatibility.
Neuroscience & Neurology
June 09, 2009 | 2 Comments | By Sajid Surve, DO
What is Proprioception?
More In Neuroscience & Neurology
- Reflections on Plasticity
- Migraine Uncovered – Interview with Dr. Cady, Headache Expert
- The Many Facets of Addiction
- Objective Testing for Alzheimer’s Disease
- Free Will and the Philosophy of Science
Neuroscience & Neurology
Opinion
June 21, 2009 | 6 Comments | By T. A. McNamee, MD
Time for a Change – Gender Reassignment
More In Opinion
- What is Free Will?
- Medical Controversy – When Does Life Begin?
- Emotions and the Brain
- Relying on a Peripheral Brain
- How Many Babies Is Too Many?
Opinion
Psychiatry & Psychology
July 03, 2009 | 2 Comments | By Dirk Hanson, MA
Why Do Schizophrenics Smoke Cigarettes?
More In Psychiatry & Psychology
- Prevention of Adolescent Depression
- Common Treatment Ineffective for Autism
- Are Humans Hard-Wired to Torture?
- Cognitive Theories and Brain Damage
- Poor Outcomes for Older Adults with Depression


The study you reference was declared fraudulent by a Federal judge.
The definitive studies on smoking were conducted back in the fifties when scientists tried and failed to cause diseases in animals with heavy doses of smoke. Anything that disagrees with these findings is a bald faced lie.