Why Can’t We Stop Eating?




shutterstock_186230864

We have long known the simplest recipe for weight loss: eat less and exercise more. Yet despite our understanding of the causes of weight fluctuation and the serious health risks associated with obesity, our collective weight continues to rise.

Researchers have suggested several potential culprits for the ‘obesity epidemic,’ including genetic predisposition, lack of education, and cultural incentives for unhealthy behaviors (such as time and cost savings). However, none of these factors provides a thorough explanation of the problem. Indeed, most of us, regardless of our specific genes, knowledge, and cultures, can relate to the desire to eat too much, and many of us indulge in this temptation, despite our rational understanding of the disadvantages of doing so.

Though there are likely several factors that lead to obesity, it is generally accepted that the most direct cause for obesity is excessive consumption. Thus, the most universal solution for obesity may intervene in the decision making process by modifying feeding choices. A prerequisite for such a solution is an understanding of the neural mechanisms underlying our decisions regarding food.

In response to the complexity of obesity and to the recent controversial declaration by the American Medical Association (AMA) that obesity is itself a disease, Nature featured a comprehensive Outlook issue on the ‘disease’ this month. The collection of articles closed with a discussion of the neural circuits involved in appetite, the elucidation of which has been greatly facilitated in the past few years by the development of optogenetic techniques, which allow for the activation and inactivation of individual neurons using light.

According to Bradford Lowell, a neuroscientist at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in Boston, the hypothalamus, which has long been recognized as the feeding center of the brain, is “a tangle of circuits that look like a Jackson Pollock painting.” The Nature discussion on the physiology of appetite included an explanation of agouti-related peptide (AgRP) neurons and pro-opiomelanocortin (POMC) neurons in the hypothalamus, which stimulate and suppress appetite, respectively. In the 1990s, scientists demonstrated that knocking out the genes for individual appetite stimulator peptides does not affect eating behavior or weight. Further, though full destruction of the AgRP nucleus in mice results in starvation, GABA receptor stimulation of the parabrachial nucleus, which communicates directly with the hypothalamus, reinstates food consumption. It thus appears that mammals have evolved some neural redundancy that increases the chances that we remember to eat.

Nonetheless, the circuitry underlying appetite can be altered such that eating becomes excessive or absent. For example, loss of oxytocin neurons in the hypothalamus produces an insatiable appetite, as observed in Prader-Willi syndrome, whereas stimulation of calcitonin gene-related protein (CGRP) neurons in the parabrachial nucleus of mice leads to starvation. The latter examples illustrates one challenge in dealing with obesity: unlike with drugs of abuse, abstinence from food is not a viable solution to problematic indulgence.

Some researchers believe that our understanding of the molecules that signal hunger and satiety information will facilitate the development of drugs that are effective for eating disorders. However, I believe there are limitations to this approach. First, the sensation of hunger often indicates a physiological need. We can consume many (‘empty’) calories without satiety if the calories do not consist of appropriate amounts of protein. Thus, pharmacologically blocking hunger or inducing satiety may prevent consumption of important nutrients and exacerbate health problems. Second, much of our problematic eating is not actually a response to hunger. In other words, we often eat not to eliminate the aversive sense of hunger, but to reap the rewarding effects of food that are independent of nourishment. Enhancing satiety would likely have little impact on this type of consumption.

Though the integration of reward signals in the hypothalamus is mentioned in the Outlook issue of Nature, the implications of the rewarding effects of food consumption are largely ignored. Nonetheless, the impact of high sugar and high fat foods on reward centers of the brain is reminiscent of that of drugs of abuse. Like drugs, these foods enhance dopamine release in the midbrain, thereby increasing the likelihood that such foods will be consumed again in the future. Drug addicts and compulsive eaters also both display structural abnormalities in the prefrontal cortex (PFC), which is important for executive control. Accordingly, both populations tend to have difficulty controlling their consumption, despite the negative consequences associated with it. Such behavior is consistent with the abundance of research suggesting that changes in PFC render us more vulnerable to reward and habitual behaviors and that those with such changes tend to choose immediate gratification over long-term accomplishments.

Much of society’s food consumption results from reward signals that are not nutritionally informative. Further, behaviors resulting from these reward signals reinforce unhealthy choices. Targeting these signals, rather than hypothalamic signals that indicate nutritional status, may therefore be more effective in reducing problematic eating and promoting overall health.

References

Atasoy, D., Betley, J., Su, H., & Sternson, S. (2012). Deconstruction of a neural circuit for hunger Nature, 488 (7410), 172-177 DOI: 10.1038/nature11270

Carter ME, Soden ME, Zweifel LS, & Palmiter RD (2013). Genetic identification of a neural circuit that suppresses appetite. Nature, 503 (7474), 111-4 PMID: 24121436

Dalley JW, Everitt BJ, & Robbins TW (2011). Impulsivity, compulsivity, and top-down cognitive control. Neuron, 69 (4), 680-94 PMID: 21338879

DiLeone RJ, Taylor JR, & Picciotto MR (2012). The drive to eat: comparisons and distinctions between mechanisms of food reward and drug addiction. Nature neuroscience, 15 (10), 1330-5 PMID: 23007187

Elias MF, Elias PK, Sullivan LM, Wolf PA, & D’Agostino RB (2003). Lower cognitive function in the presence of obesity and hypertension: the Framingham heart study. International journal of obesity and related metabolic disorders : journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity, 27 (2), 260-8 PMID: 12587008

Erickson JC, Clegg KE, & Palmiter RD (1996). Sensitivity to leptin and susceptibility to seizures of mice lacking neuropeptide Y. Nature, 381 (6581), 415-21 PMID: 8632796

Guegan, T., Cutando, L., Ayuso, E., Santini, E., Fisone, G., Bosch, F., Martinez, A., Valjent, E., Maldonado, R., & Martin, M. (2013). Operant behavior to obtain palatable food modifies neuronal plasticity in the brain reward circuit European Neuropsychopharmacology, 23 (2), 146-159 DOI: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2012.04.004

Gunstad J, Paul RH, Cohen RA, Tate DF, Spitznagel MB, & Gordon E (2007). Elevated body mass index is associated with executive dysfunction in otherwise healthy adults. Comprehensive psychiatry, 48 (1), 57-61 PMID: 17145283

Maayan L, Hoogendoorn C, Sweat V, & Convit A (2011). Disinhibited eating in obese adolescents is associated with orbitofrontal volume reductions and executive dysfunction. Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.), 19 (7), 1382-7 PMID: 21350433

Ollmann MM, Wilson BD, Yang YK, Kerns JA, Chen Y, Gantz I, & Barsh GS (1997). Antagonism of central melanocortin receptors in vitro and in vivo by agouti-related protein. Science (New York, N.Y.), 278 (5335), 135-8 PMID: 9311920

Piguet O, Petersén A, Yin Ka Lam B, Gabery S, Murphy K, Hodges JR, & Halliday GM (2011). Eating and hypothalamus changes in behavioral-variant frontotemporal dementia. Annals of neurology, 69 (2), 312-9 PMID: 21387376

Scully, T. (2014). Obesity. Nature, 508.

Smith DG, & Robbins TW (2013). The neurobiological underpinnings of obesity and binge eating: a rationale for adopting the food addiction model. Biological psychiatry, 73 (9), 804-10 PMID: 23098895

Trivedi BP (2014). Neuroscience: Dissecting appetite. Nature, 508 (7496) PMID: 24740131

Volkow ND, Wang GJ, Telang F, Fowler JS, Goldstein RZ, Alia-Klein N, Logan J, Wong C, Thanos PK, Ma Y, & Pradhan K (2009). Inverse association between BMI and prefrontal metabolic activity in healthy adults. Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.), 17 (1), 60-5 PMID: 18948965

Vucetic Z, Kimmel J, & Reyes TM (2011). Chronic high-fat diet drives postnatal epigenetic regulation of ?-opioid receptor in the brain. Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 36 (6), 1199-206 PMID: 21326195

Williams, S., & Deisseroth, K. (2013). Optogenetics Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110 (41), 16287-16287 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1317033110

Wu Q, Boyle MP, & Palmiter RD (2009). Loss of GABAergic signaling by AgRP neurons to the parabrachial nucleus leads to starvation. Cell, 137 (7), 1225-34 PMID: 19563755

Image via Lithian / Shutterstock.

  • onergk69

    Nisha & others,

    In psychology & in regards to binge-eating disorder, anorexia & bulimia we can demonstate that environmental conditions (phenotype) can easily trump both genetic hunger & biological hunger (genotype). So we do discuss “psychosocial hunger” & also explore environmental starvation in poorest areas on the globe; self-imposed starvation such as in anorexia; and the binging/purging we find in bulemia.

    From an evolutionary perspective, starvation is a greater threat to body integrity & survival than excessive intake.

    Rich

  • Moipone

    I think one of the main reasons why people cannot stop eating yet they are overweight is being financially advanced. They are able to buy anything they wany whenever they want, hence they cannot achieve a goal of eating less. But isnt eating less going to affect their normal body functions? Are they not going to run short of energy? Are they still going to be able to do daily chores which require energy sufficiently?

  • http://www.biosupply.co.uk/ Simon

    There is a lot of debate about whether obesity is linked to a biological or psychological issue. And as usual I think it comes down to psychology rather than biology. Don’t misunderstand me, I know there are people who have biological reasons for weight gain, but I do feel that over eaters don’t eat because they are hungry for food. They eat for immediate gratification. Therefore I think that the real issues we need to be investigating are emotional rather than genetic and biological

  • Charl Rautenbach

    Great article.. I love the brain and how the neurons work….

Nisha Cooch, PhD

Nisha Kaul Cooch is a Senior Contributor for Brain Blogger and founder of BioInnovation Consulting LLC, a life sciences communications firm based in Washington DC. Nisha holds a PhD in neuroscience and specializes in the nature of decision making. Follow Dr. Cooch on Twitter: @BioInnovationCo
See All Posts By The Author

Do not miss out ever again. Subscribe and get latest Brain Blogger articles straight to your inbox.