Is Thinking Bad For Your Brain?




shutterstock_25841212

Basic scientific research, old wives’ tales, and common sense all suggest that the best way to promote brain function is to keep your mind active. Intriguingly however, a recent report from Elsa Suberbielle and colleagues published in the journal Nature Neuroscience, seems to suggest just the opposite.

The DNA double helix that encodes the human genome is comprised of approximately 3 billion base pairs that dictate all of our characteristics, ranging from our eye color to our predisposition to heart disease. Disruption of proper base pairing including mutations, insertions, and deletions may lead to a variety of changes in our makeup. Although some of these base pair disruptions are more deleterious that others, double stranded breaks (DSB) in the DNA double helix remains of the most lethal.

Recent evidence indicates that normal exploration of a new environment causes significant increases in DNA DSBs in mice. In these studies, mice were moved from their home cage to a new larger cage comprised of different litter, odors, stations, and toys. They were allowed to explore the new cage for two hours with other mice that they were familiar with from their home cage. Interestingly, many of the documented breaks in DNA were found in the brain region referred to as the dentate gyrus, which is a critical region for learning and memory.

While, at first glance these data seem to suggest that “normal” thinking is bad for us, commentary from Herrup and colleagues addresses this issue. They report that while the data is scientifically sound, they may need to be viewed from a different perspective. For example, they suggest that the assays used to measure DNA DSBs may in fact be leading to the reported damage and that this idea should be further examined. In addition, is possible that the damage in DNA is functioning as a regulatory mechanism. Perhaps, by allowing some level of DNA damage, a higher degree of neuronal regulation can be achieved. Suberbielle hypothesizes that the formation of the DSBs is a natural process that permits for the remodeling of DNA and changes in gene expression that are necessary for learning, memory, and the effective processing of information.

It may be enticing to initially conclude from this report that thinking is bad for your brain. However, these data should be intended as a springboard for further studies in this area and the genetic regulatory mechanisms that are in place during “normal” brain function.

References

Herrup, K., Chen, J., & Li, J. (2013). Breaking news: thinking may be bad for DNA Nature Neuroscience, 16 (5), 518-519 DOI: 10.1038/nn.3384

Suberbielle, E., Sanchez, P., Kravitz, A., Wang, X., Ho, K., Eilertson, K., Devidze, N., Kreitzer, A., & Mucke, L. (2013). Physiologic brain activity causes DNA double-strand breaks in neurons, with exacerbation by amyloid-? Nature Neuroscience, 16 (5), 613-621 DOI: 10.1038/nn.3356

Image via Pakhnyushcha / Shutterstock.

  • All animals seem to have a default that conserves brain energy. Being conservative, supporting the status quo, limiting exploration to younger males of mating age, group conformity.

    So there may be behavioral expressions of energy, perhaps DNA, conservation.

  • Everybody uses their brain for thinking almost every second of the day. If this is true, to what extent is thinking bad for our health? Can you measure it?

  • Jennifer

    I believe thinking is a very positive thing to do. I like to relax for 20 mins a day just to think.

  • This study is very interesting. If this is true then we aren’t healthy at all. I don’t know, I just believe thinking is the main function of our brain. That’s the reason why we have brain so that we can think and have logical reasons.

  • Awesome word…Love this post! Very insightful, I look forward to more on these topics. I hope all enjoyed here like me.Keep it up.

  • Pingback: ¿Pensar es malo para tu cerebro?()

Norell Hadzimichalis, PhD

Norell Hadzimichalis, PhD, is a trained molecular biologist with postdoctoral research experience in a prominent neuroscience laboratory. She holds a PhD in Molecular Biology from The University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey. She has authored and co-authored multiple peer reviewed research and review articles in journals including Schizophrenia Research, Brain Research, and the Journal of Neuroscience. Her current interests are in commercializing basic scientific findings and exploring methods of moving research from the benchside to the bedside.
See All Posts By The Author

Do not miss out ever again. Subscribe to get our newsletter delivered to your inbox a few times a month.