Tackling Schizophrenia Using the Eriksonian Stages




shutterstock_3550694

Erik Erikson developed a psychosocial stage theory that illuminates how people progress through certain stages during their life spans. The stages in this theory of development may be negotiated poorly by people with chronic illness and schizophrenia, so Erikson’s theory may have bearing on treatment for schizophrenia in adulthood.

Erikson’s life stages

  1. Trust versus mistrust -> Hope
  2. Autonomy versus shame and doubt -> Will
  3. Initiative versus guilt -> Purpose
  4. Industry versus inferiority -> Competence
  5. Identity versus role confusion -> Fidelity
  6. Intimacy versus isolation -> Love
  7. Generativity versus stagnation -> Care
  8. Ego integrity versus despair -> Wisdom

Although it is acknowledged that schizophrenia is – at least in part – a biochemical disorder, it is hypothesized that failure to achieve a positive result for two stages in particular may contribute to the condition of schizophrenia in adulthood.

The first of these stages – trust versus mistrust – is usually more or less mastered during the first year of life. If the baby has a warm and secure symbiotic relationship with his or her primary caregiver, it will provide the individual with positive feelings toward the world and a vital sense of hope and trust of other people. Hope provides a basis for the individual’s relationships with all of his or her future relationships.

The next stage is called ‘autonomy versus shame and doubt’. At this stage of life, the child is toilet trained – a significant event in a child’s life, especially if you look at it symbolically. Being trained to use a toilet corresponds with self-control, independence and confidence. The helplessness of not achieving this is congruent with shame, both in childhood and in adulthood. This stage, if negotiated successfully, will culminate in confidence and self-control, or as Erikson terms it, the ability to utilize ‘will’.

‘Initiative versus guilt’ is the next stage of psychosocial development during which the child develops a basic understanding of morality, gains self-esteem and learns to cooperate with peers. This is affected by means of a sense of power and control of the child’s environment, resulting in the positive outcome of ‘purpose’.

‘Industry versus inferiority’ represents the next stage of development. The goal of this stage reflects the individual’s ability to rely on himself, during which the child will learn about friendship, self-evaluation and teamwork, providing a sense of ‘competence’ in terms of educational achievement.

The next stage is signified by ‘identity versus role confusion’, which occurs in adolescence. If the individual successfully negotiates this stage, he or she will form an identity linked to beliefs, political views, religion, career choice, sexual identity and many other qualities of the self. The goal of this stage is ‘fidelity’ or faithfulness with respect to one’s self-definition.

It is significant that this stage aligns itself with the time of life that individuals may become schizophrenic. This stage may be poorly negotiated due to the emergence of mental illness, compromising the formation of identity. The tasks of this stage may be compromised as a result. The individual with a mental illness may be alienated and therefore not exposed to various choices and ways of viewing the self. As a result, he or she may define himself as mentally ill, and this self-definition may represent the greatest component of his identity, contributing to his or her own sense of stigmatization.

This stage of ‘identity versus role confusion’ represents a recapitulation of the ‘autonomy versus shame and doubt’ stage of development. This means that the person who is diagnosed as a schizophrenic may have had difficulties in early childhood that re-emerge in late adolescence. Of course, the concept that the root of mental illness is biochemical does not support this view regarding the etiology of mental illness.

The next stage of development that may be impacted by mental illness is the ‘intimacy versus isolation’ stage. The successful culmination of this stage results in the choice of a mate with the goal of ‘love’. It is obvious that schizophrenics have difficulties at this stage, perhaps due to alienation caused by other symptoms of mental illness. This stage involves a recapitulation of the early ‘trust versus mistrust stage’. In terms of the etiology or causes of schizophrenia, poor negotiation of the first stage of Eriksonian development may impact the success or failure of the ‘intimacy versus isolation’ stage. Again, this hypothesis is not consistent with the medical model of schizophrenia, but it may be complimentary.

Given that these two latter stages may occur when the schizophrenic is first experiencing mental illness, it is clear that he or she may need support at this time of life. This holds true regardless of to what extent he or she succeeds with the tasks of these latter two stages. He or she may require help with the final stages of ‘generativity versus stagnation’ and ‘ego integrity versus despair’ as well.

Treatment for mental illness by means of psychotherapy could potentially involve a psychotherapeutic paradigm based on the Eriksonian stages as a model for therapeutic treatment. The ‘trust versus mistrust’ stage would be the initial focus of the therapy, and the ‘autonomy versus shame and doubt’ would be the next focal point. The stages of therapy would continue, replicating the Eriksonian stages in terms of achieving positive outcomes for each subsequent goal.

This model for treatment of serious mental illness has been offered by others in the fields of psychiatry and psychology. Nevertheless, it is clear that a replication of the first two stages should be renegotiated in terms of psychotherapeutic treatment of schizophrenia, as these first two stages of Erikson’s developmental model represent a basis for success in the key ‘identity versus role confusion’ and the ‘intimacy versus isolation’ stages.

Given that social involvement is helpful if not curative of serious mental illness such as schizophrenia, an emphasis on psychosocial development may ameliorate some of the psychopathological aspects of schizophrenia. Ultimately, using the Eriksonian stages as a paradigm for psychotherapy may provide a substantial basis for work with schizophrenics that overshadows simple social skills training.

Image via Michael Drager / Shutterstock.

  • Pingback: Tackling Schizophrenia Using the Eriksonian Stages()

  • Pingback: Oxytocin Makes Schizophrenia Patients More Socially Savvy – Medscape | Mock()

  • onergk69

    Ann & others,

    Erickson’s work, to me, is more valid in the development of personality than schizophrenia It is far more psychosocial in its implications.

    Schizophrenia shows itself in males in the late teens; while in women it emerges in their 20’s & 30’s.

    Certainly, our clients evidence premorbid personalities. As far as we know, personality begins to emerge around age 3, is dynamically shaped by life experiences till around the 3rd life decade.

    So,for many, the so-called “weird” personality cluster d/o’s can be addressed using Erickson’s paradigm.

    Rich

    • I agree that the first years of life constitute a period of significant personality development. However, if the first two Eriksonian stages are disrupted, this bodes poorly for the recapitualtion of these stages: “identity vs. role confusion” and “intimacy vs. isolation”, and there is no reason to believe that psychotic disorders have nothing to do with the early or latter Eriksonian stages. Moreover, these two latter stages might be negotiated poorly due to emergent symptoms of schizophrenia.

      I believe that personality and personality disorders may have more to do with the psychosocial stages than does schizophrenia. The ideas of Mahler and other object relations theorists serve to elucidate this. Anyway, poor resolution of the Eriksonian stages probably has a lot to do with various diagnosed psychopathology.

  • Pingback: Multiple Outside Resources Regarding schizophrenia or psychosis | Mm172001's Blog()

  • deshan

    thanks

    • deshan

      Many children have inappropriate behaviors that are part of their disability.

  • Pingback: Treating Schizophrenia and Borderline Personality Disorder Differently | Brain Blogger()

Ann Reitan, PsyD

Ann Reitan, PsyD, is a clinical psychologist and well published essayist of fiction and creative nonfiction. She holds a Bachelor of Arts in Psychology from University of Washington, Master of Arts in Psychology from Pepperdine University, and Doctorate of Clinical Psychology from Alliant International University. Her post-doctoral research at Washington University in St. Louis, MO, involved personality theory, idiodynamics and creativity in literature. She recently published Illuminating Schizophrenia: Insights into the Uncommon Mind.
See All Posts By The Author

Do not miss out ever again. Subscribe to get our newsletter delivered to your inbox a few times a month.