The Brain’s Stopwatch – Emotions and Time Perceptionby Juliette Siegfried, MPH | April 4, 2013
Albert Einstein, when asked to explain his theories in layman’s terms, once famously said, “When a man sits with a pretty girl for an hour, it seems like a minute. But let him sit on a hot stove for a minute and it’s longer than any hour. That’s relativity.”
That’s also how our brains work to “tell time,” according to research conducted by Sylvie Droit-Volet from Blaise Pascal University and Sandrine Gil from Poitiers University, France. These neurophysiologists point out that although we have five senses with which to measure the universe around us, our brains have no specific receptors with which to measure time. Most of the time we manage anyway, have a pretty good idea of whether things happen “on time” or “not on time,” and after the age of six we can make fairly accurate assessments of time duration — how long it takes for common actions to happen.
After the age of eight we also begin to develop remarkably sophisticated abilities to “count time,” meaning to accurately tell how many seconds or minutes have passed between an initial “Start now” stimulus and a final “Stop now” stimulus. Brain researchers in the early 60s theorized that this sense of “subjective time” was due to a mechanism in our brains similar to a stopwatch, which operates similar to the ticking of a clock. When we pay attention to it, this internal clock allows us to develop a pretty good sense of objective time.
But does this “brain stopwatch” always “tick” at the same rate?
Have you ever, for example, been in a dangerous situation like an automobile accident and had your perception of time “slow down,” as if objective time itself were passing more slowly? Have you ever had a conversation with a beautiful person, à la Einstein’s quote above, and felt time pass more quickly? How does that happen if we’ve got an internal stopwatch in our brains constantly ticking away?
To find out, Droit-Volet and Gil conducted a number of experiments in which subjects were shown excerpts from three different types of potentially emotion-provoking films and then asked to subjectively estimate the duration of a visual stimulus. One group of films was designed to provoke fear (Scream, The Blair Witch Project), another group to provoke sadness (Philadephia, City Of Angels), and a third group to provoke neutral reactions.
After watching the fear-provoking films, the subjects consistently perceived the stimulus as lasting longer than it really did; the emotion of fear seemed to trigger a “slowing down” of time. There were no such time distortions after watching the other two groups of films. Speculating about the possible causes of this, the researchers suggested that the phenomenon might be partly physiological — the emotion of fear causes a state of physical arousal that may also speed up our “internal clocks.” When you are afraid, your heart speeds up, your blood pressure increases, your pupils dilate, and your body unconsciously goes into “fight or flight” mode, preparing to either defend itself or run away. The sad or neutral films may not have affected the subjects’ sense of time as much because there was no corresponding change in physiological functions.
Gil and Droit-Volet also found this time dilation effect when subjects merely looked at the face of someone close to them expressing an emotion such as shame. Previous studies have indicated that when we see shame in others, we instinctively try to mimic the other person’s emotional state. As Droit-Volet explains,
This reflective activity distracts attention from time-processing, so that estimated time seems shorter than it really is.
She also points out that these changes in our perception of time are not the result of a malfunction of our internal clocks, but a shifting of our attention in response to events:
There is no single, uniform time, but rather multiple times which we experience. Our temporal distortions are a direct translation of the way in which our brain and body adapt to these multiple times, the times of life.
More research must be conducted to understand exactly how our perceptions of time change, but one thing is certain — they change. Time really is relative.
Buhusi CV, & Meck WH (2005). What makes us tick? Functional and neural mechanisms of interval timing. Nature reviews. Neuroscience, 6 (10), 755-65 PMID: 16163383
Droit-Volet S, Fayolle SL, & Gil S (2011). Emotion and time perception: effects of film-induced mood. Frontiers in integrative neuroscience, 5 PMID: 21886610
Living with Schizoaffective Disorder – A Personal Story
Collective Memory – Without WWIII Could Obama Be Forgotten?
The Determiner Wars
Brains Aren’t Fooled By Virtual Reality
Kids are Not Naturally Nice – Parents Shape Future Heroes
What Do Smartphones Do to the Brain?
Hearing Red – Sensory Substitution With Your Smartphone
Digital Dieting to Prevent Life-Destroying Internet Addiction
Stephen Hawking turns 73 today, defeating the odds of a daunting diagnosis by over half a century. The famous theoretical physicist popularized modern... READ MORE →
Do not miss out ever again. Subscribe to get our newsletter delivered to your inbox a few times a month.
Like what you read? Give to Brain Blogger sponsored by GNIF with a tax-deductible donation.Make A Donation