
Physical Strength Predicts Mortality

Aging gracefully is a challenge for all who are fortunate enough to be given the privilege of growing old. If there was a secret to staying strong and avoiding death as long as possible, someone would have surely discovered it by now. While the secret to successful aging might still elude researchers, new evidence suggests that clinicians can, at least, predict patients that will stay stronger longer.
A new study published in the British Medical Journal (BMJ) is a review and meta-analysis of 33 observational studies that evaluated the association between objective measures of physical capabilities and mortality. Grip strength was the most common measurement of physical capability, recorded in 23 of the studies, but walking speed, chair rising speed, and standing balance were also measured in several studies. Overall, poor performance on any of the 4 physical tests was associated with higher all-cause mortality. For example, participants with the lowest recorded grip strength were 1.67 times more likely to die from all-cause mortality than those with the highest grip strength, after adjustment for confounding factors. Similarly, participants with the slowest walking speed experienced a near 3-fold risk of death compared to those with the fastest walking speed.
A majority of these studies included in the BMJ analysis were conducted in people over 70 years of age. However, 5 studies evaluated grip strength in people under age 60. Across all ages, poor physical performance was associated with increased mortality. All participants were community-dwelling adults.
A similar analysis conducted by the same authors as the BMJ study compared the same objective measurements of physical performance to health status. They concluded that poor grip strength and slow walking speed were associated with an increased fracture risk and increased cognitive decline, although confounding factors may have played a role in these associations.
The BMJ study provides potentially useful markers for identifying older people at higher risk of death, but the broader question surrounds how to develop and maintain physical capabilities and strength in older age. Frailty as a component of aging describes a syndrome of global impairment and decreased physiologic reserves and overlaps with the metrics evaluated by the BMJ authors. Frailty leads to increased vulnerability, decreased tolerance for internal and external stressors, and an inability to maintain physiologic and psychosocial equilibrium. Frailty, as a clinical syndrome, is characterized by low physical activity, low muscle strength, increased fatigue, slowness of gait, and weight loss, and it is associated with adverse health outcomes, including dependency, disability, hospitalization, institutionalization, and mortality. The ambiguity of the definition and consequences of frailty in the elderly allow the clinical symptoms to be explained by comorbid conditions, nutritional deficiencies, overall deconditioning, and a host of non-descript balance and motor disorders, as well as hormonal imbalances and immune and inflammatory status. Still, elderly people who are classified as “frail” experience a significantly higher risk of falls, decreased mobility, disability, hospitalization, and death, after accounting for other confounding factors.
Related research indicates that cognitive and physical markers of physical performance and frailty are evident as early as childhood. Men and women with the highest cognitive performance and slowest memory decline throughout life (measured from adolescence to adulthood) perform better on tests of standing balance and chair rising speed. Additionally, children who performed better at milestone attainment in childhood, cognitive ability, and motor coordination showed better physical performance and muscular strength later in life. Thus, it seems that healthy living in later life begins in childhood.
Growing old is not for the faint of heart, or body, and there may never be an answer to the ever-elusive question of how to travel through life with a strong body and mind. But now, clinicians can quantify physical strength related to health and mortality risk and identify those who can make medical and lifestyle changes to increase their chance of growing old gracefully.
References
Ensrud KE, Ewing SK, Cawthon PM, Fink HA, Taylor BC, Cauley JA, Dam TT, Marshall LM, Orwoll ES, Cummings SR, & Osteoporotic Fractures in Men Research Group (2009). A comparison of frailty indexes for the prediction of falls, disability, fractures, and mortality in older men. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 57 (3), 492-8 PMID: 19245414
Cooper R, Kuh D, Cooper C, Gale CR, Lawlor DA, Matthews F, Hardy R, & the FALCon and HALCyon Study Teams (2010). Objective measures of physical capability and subsequent health: a systematic review. Age and ageing PMID: 20843964
Cooper R, Kuh D, Hardy R, Mortality Review Group, & FALCon and HALCyon study teams (2010). Objectively measured physical capability levels and mortality: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 341 PMID: 20829298
Fried LP, Tangen CM, Walston J, Newman AB, Hirsch C, Gottdiener J, Seeman T, Tracy R, Kop WJ, Burke G, McBurnie MA, & Cardiovascular Health Study Collaborative Research Group (2001). Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype. The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences, 56 (3) PMID: 11253156
Kuh D, Cooper R, Hardy R, Guralnik J, Richards M, & Musculoskeletal Study Team (2009). Lifetime cognitive performance is associated with midlife physical performance in a prospective national birth cohort study. Psychosomatic medicine, 71 (1), 38-48 PMID: 19124616
Kuh D, Hardy R, Butterworth S, Okell L, Richards M, Wadsworth M, Cooper C, & Sayer AA (2006). Developmental origins of midlife physical performance: evidence from a British birth cohort. American journal of epidemiology, 164 (2), 110-21 PMID: 16757569
Kuh D, Hardy R, Butterworth S, Okell L, Wadsworth M, Cooper C, & Aihie Sayer A (2006). Developmental origins of midlife grip strength: findings from a birth cohort study. The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences, 61 (7), 702-6 PMID: 16870632
Topinková E (2008). Aging, disability and frailty. Annals of nutrition & metabolism, 52 Suppl 1, 6-11 PMID: 18382070
1 Response
Leave a Reply
Popular Posts
- The Love Drug
- Women After Sex
- Fatty Acids and Suicide Risk
- Mind Games - Science's Attempts at Thought Control
- Risks of Personalized Medicine
- Is Giftedness Nothing More than Good Genes?
- Intelligence - Are You Holding Back Your Brain?
- Behind the Masks - The Mysteries of Dissociative Identity Disorder
- The NeuroSocial Network
- Inside Your Brain on Holiday
Future Posts
- Drug-Induced Mystical Experience
- Facebook – Coming to a 12-Step Program near You?
Latest Posts
- Therapeutic Analysis of Dreams – A Cognitive-Behavioral Approach
- Small Groups Make Women Stupid
- Psychotherapy and Clinical Boundaries
- The Brain’s Buying Power
- Aging Intelligently
- A Nicotine Patch a Day Keeps the Cognitive Impairment Away
- The Many Emerging Roles of Astrocytes
- Diabetes Impairs Cognition
- Media Violence Leads to Real Violence
- Intelligence – Are You Holding Back Your Brain?
Comments
- barbara stoufer: where does one get a stimluato
- Psicologos Barcelona: Richard, tu español es muy bue
- Lage: Alexis,What evidence do yo
- Adi: Hi, with my best intentions an
- Tamara G. Suttle, M.Ed., LPC: Thanks so much, Richard, for d
- PhD: The title of this article is o
- Niobe Chacks: Well;the article is good but i
- Alexis Remm: LageI think that you don´t
- Lage: Alexis,You still never ans
- JamMiester1711: Be careful not to be miss info
- Ron: If there is such a thing as a
- Cory: How about how TV commercials t









great article, thank you. Strength can be improved at any age and the risks of heart disease reduced.