
Empathy – How Much is Too Much?

The physician-patient relationship is the cornerstone to quality medical care. A key component to this relationship is physician empathy — the ability to understand the patient’s experiences and feelings and view the world from the patient’s perspective. Empathy is so important in this day and age that medical and other health care professional schools are instituting empathy training programs and establishing empathy-related learning objectives. But, a recent study reveals that physicians might benefit from decreasing their empathy response and improve clinical outcomes.
Empathy certainly plays a positive role in interpersonal relationships. In health care, empathy is associated with many positive attributes, including dutifulness, prosocial behavior, moral reasoning, reduced malpractice litigation, improved history taking and physical examination, patient satisfaction, physician satisfaction, improved therapeutic relationships, and overall improved clinical outcomes. Some researchers claim that empathy is always beneficial in medical care and allows physicians to complete clinical tasks more accurately. However, others argue that keeping an emotional distance from patients maintains clinical neutrality. This is especially true in clinical specialties in which practitioners routinely inflict pain or discomfort on their patients, such as surgery.
A study recently published in the journal NeuroImage asserts that emotional regulation skills are critical for physicians, since too much empathy impedes the delivery of quality medical care. They maintain that the repeat exposure to the suffering of others is associated with negative outcomes, including personal distress, compassion fatigue and burnout, all of which lead to poor quality health care and an increased risk of medical errors. If physicians down-regulate their empathy response, it may weaken the negative effects of perceiving the pain of others and free up cognitive resources that are needed for completing clinical tasks.
Empathy is a natural human response with a biological basis and proves that humans are fundamentally altruistic beings that care for others. But, barriers to empathy in health care exist: gender, culture, or clinical specialty. Also, some physicians feel there is not enough time to engage in truly compassionate care, that empathy for patients is too exhausting, or that they do not have the proper skills to engage in empathy.
So far, the data on whether or not empathy is truly advantageous in health care is inconclusive. While a complete lack of empathy is a barrier to quality medical care, so is too much empathy. Physicians and other health care professionals need to maintain an appropriate emotional distance from patients, if only to maintain their own emotional well-being. This so-called “compassionate detachment” does not mean that physicians care less for their patients or do not understand their patients’ perspectives; it means that physicians keep their emotions under control in order to maintain clinical objectivity and personal and professional stability. Some empathy is good, but a lot is not always better.
References
Brunero, S., Lamont, S., & Coates, M. (2010). A review of empathy education in nursing Nursing Inquiry, 17 (1), 65-74 DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1800.2009.00482.x
Cheng, Y., Lin, C., Liu, H., Hsu, Y., Lim, K., Hung, D., & Decety, J. (2007). Expertise Modulates the Perception of Pain in Others Current Biology, 17 (19), 1708-1713 DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2007.09.020
Decety, J., Yang, C., & Cheng, Y. (2010). Physicians down-regulate their pain empathy response: An event-related brain potential study NeuroImage DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.01.025
Hojat M, Gonnella JS, Nasca TJ, Mangione S, Vergare M, Magee M. Physician empathy: definition, components, measurement, and relationship to gender and specialty. Am J Psychiatry. Sep 2002;159(9):1563-1569.
Mason, P., & Bartal, I. (2010). How the social brain experiences empathy: Summary of a gathering Social Neuroscience, 1-5 DOI: 10.1080/17470911003589085
Neumann, M., Bensing, J., Mercer, S., Ernstmann, N., Ommen, O., & Pfaff, H. (2009). Analyzing the “nature” and “specific effectiveness” of clinical empathy: A theoretical overview and contribution towards a theory-based research agenda Patient Education and Counseling, 74 (3), 339-346 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.11.013
Singer T (2007). The neuronal basis of empathy and fairness. Novartis Foundation symposium, 278 PMID: 17214308
4 Responses
Total Mind and Body Fitness Blog Carnival 147…
Monday is Blog Carnivals Day. A Blog Carnival is basically a collection of articles or blog posts, all relating to a similar subject, that are gathered together for your viewing pleasure. You can quickly and conveniently see a list of Article Titles an…
[...] my mind, I had to agree with what my family said. [Although too much empathy can be a problemo - http://brainblogger.com/2010/03/21/empathy-how-much-is-too-much/ & more on mirror neurons [...]
Leave a Reply
Popular Posts
- Goal Setting - Pitfalls and Benefits
- Why Some Human Brains Become Leaders, While Others Followers?
- Clinical Psychologists' Perceptions of Persons with Mental Illness
- Exercise - It Works For Depression
- Deep Brain Stimulation - A New Frontier in Psychiatry
- Pulling The Plug Too Soon?
- Psychotropics and Youth, Part 3 - Equip Teachers with Prescription Pads?
- Antidepressants Not Effective for Some Types of Depression
- Mind your Immune System
- Light at the End of the Tunnel or Too Much Carbon Dioxide?
- Cults and Terrorism, Part 1 - The Problem of Definition
- Societal Assumptions on Abuse and the Victim's Perspective
- My Nephew and his Brain, Part 4 - Their Life Today
Future Posts
Latest Posts
- When Bipolar Patients Abuse Drugs – The Dual Diagnosis Dilemma
- Peace and Conflict, Part 3 – Conflict Resolution
- Addicted to Love
- Cheers to a Decreased Risk of Arthritis
- Breaking Up is Not So Hard to Do
- It Takes a Village to Prevent Obesity
- Peace and Conflict, Part 2 – The Role of Religion
- Social Interaction at the Work Place – A Case Study Analysis
- Drugs for Bulimia
- Violent Video Games as a Learning Tool
Comments
- Gabriel Pineres: This is a question that I see
- Dr. Raymond Rupert: hi Jennifer:Just wondering
- Mohammed Surat Alam: Human mind is complicated. Mos
- Shery: Good morning,I am 52 years
- Dee: I had a TBI 22 years ago. I ha
- NosmoKING: Should we still have to take a
- michael: It is up to people to spend th
- Michele: But my argument with this arti
- Chelee Bean: Yep, valid point.
- René: I'd have loved to disagree wit
- sean: hi i am 41 now but had a mva
- Evan: Thanks Isabella, I like the no
Life insurance, San Francisco Doctor, Best vitamins supplements, Online Criminal Justice Degrees , alcohol rehab , Tattoo , Rollup Banner Stands , Biotechnology , Breast Cancer and Adjuvant Therapy , Buy Adequan , Cystic Fibrosis Lungs , Pancreas Cancer , Individual Health Insurance , Colon Cancer Treatment , Edgepark Medical , Mattress , MP3 Player Accessories , Gene Haas , Astrology compatibility.









Don’t agree, to my opinion empathy is not easily learned, it’s a quality not everyone simply has or can be educated. Mostly what is meant by empathy is sympathy. This last aspect of the doctor patient relationship can be energy consuming.
Both have to be teached learned and used with patient care, emotional distance is mostly an excuse not to get involved instead of it being tiresome.
As far as empathy and sympathy are concerned it is unclear whether they represent distinct phenomena or whether they reflect parallel processes that covary across situations.
Empathy is an effortful process by which we try to comprehend another’s experience, while sympathy would be a direct perceptual awareness of another person’s experience akin to the phenomenon of sympathetic resonance. Sympathy does not necessarily require feeling any kind of congruent emotions on part of the observer, a detached recognition or representation that the other is in need or suffers might be sufficient.
Interesting subject of which appropriate emotional distance is mostly not the problem, most doctors already possess that capacity.
Thanks Dr shock
Empathy is not the same thing as emotional attachment.
You can understand a persons thoughts and feelings completely without sharing them or even liking them.
You don’t have to be a sadist to understand how a sadist thinks, and you don’t need to be a gay man to uderstand how and why a gay man enjoys gay sex.
A psychiatrist can never have too much empathy.
Even if you feel that the patient is just like you, you can have empathy and still be emotionally detatched.
It is the attachment that is draining.
But can you chose to be emotionally detatched? And should you?
Doesn’t that depend on which branch of psychiatry you are practicing? And dosen’t that depend on the patient?
If the patient has empathy too, will pshchotherapy ever work, if the doctor isn’t emotionally attached?
Barbara Stott