Brain Blogger Home
  • Home
  • About
    • Editor's Note
    • Contributors
    • Blog Carnival
  • Advertise
  • Archives
    • By Author
    • By Topic
    • By Year
    • By Month
  • Contact
  • Topics
    • Popular
    • Series
    • Video
  • Sitemap
  • Subscribe
  • Contribute
  • Neuroscience & Neurology
  • Psychology & Psychiatry
  • Health & Healthcare
  • More >>
    • BioPsychoSocial Health
    • Brain Blogging Carnival
    • Complementary & Alternative Medicine
    • Drugs & Clinical Trials
    • Drugs & Pharmacology Blog Carnival
    • History of Medicine
    • Law & Politics
    • Living with a Brain Disorder
    • Opinion
    • Site News
    • Stigmatization
Brain Blogger RSS Feed

Brain Blogger Feed & Subscription Options

Follow BB:

Brain Blogger on FaceBook Brain Blogger on twitter Brain Blogger on Flickr Brain Blogger on YouTube
Neuroscience & Neurology
February 25, 2010

How Your Brain Groups Words

By Seth Wulkan, BA | 3 Comments | 
  • Share / Save / Email
fMRI

When you say or hear a concrete noun, such as “apple”, what happens in your mind? Even without seeing a physical apple in front of you, your brain is drawing up an image of an apple, maybe the last one you ate or saw in the stores or on TV. A team of researchers at Carnegie Mellon used an fMRI (functional magnetic resonance image) machine to find out. Rather than using complex transparent concepts, like “honesty”, the team used simple words that convey physical, everyday objects to see which parts of the brain was activated. The goal was to see how the brain functions when we think of an object, rather than just trying to see an object in our mind. The brain was activated in many different parts for the simplest words, showing a complex, networked effect for even the easiest thoughts.

The fMRI showed that connections between specialized cells in different parts of the brain are used together to exchange information and coordinate simple tasks. However, four activation patterns emerged when 60 commonplace nouns were to be thought of in the mind. The patterns are grouped by how the noun could be sorted: things that are manipulated; things that are eaten; things that represent shelter, or an entryway into shelter; and finally, words that are long. Interestingly, when ‘eating’ nouns were thought of, the brain area associated with eating was activated, which works on coordination and movement of the lower facial muscles. Why these four seemingly simple groupings? It has to do with evolution and the hierarchy of needs.

Maslov’s Hierarchy of Needs pyramid puts human needs in groups based on survival and physiological needs at the bottom with social needs at the top. Humans evolved to survive with the lower needs being met before moving onto higher level needs. The brain works the same way. Things that are manipulated represent concrete physical things, those than exist in reality rather than abstract thought. These words relate to those that are held and used with the hands. Eating and shelter words have to do with physiological and safety needs. So why separate long words into a distinct pattern?

Long words were not useful or needed for much of human history. Human communication grew from meeting the lowest needs on the Maslov pyramid. Eating, shelter, and safety through tools and other object manipulation was needed first and foremost. Culture and civilizations, which came about much later in human history, met the needs of the lowest levels and humans were free to form societies, participate in leisure activities, and think of abstract concepts. Here, longer words emerged that could convey complex, associated and connected things. The long words used in the study represent technological objects that are often compound words from existing simpler words, or modern words (“telephone”, “refrigerators”, “airplane”). These words and word lengths weren’t needed for survival and are grouped different in the brain.

Reference

Just, M., Cherkassky, V., Aryal, S., & Mitchell, T. (2010). A Neurosemantic Theory of Concrete Noun Representation Based on the Underlying Brain Codes PLoS ONE, 5 (1) DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0008622

Seth Wulkan, BA

Mr. Wulkan is a UCLA graduate in history and geography/environmental science.

Related Articles

  • Social and Physical Pain Share Neural Architecture
  • Brain Prosthesis: Coming to a Hospital Near You?
  • The Child Brain and the Playing Teacher
  • Brain Blogging, Thirty-Fourth Edition
  • Stroke Recovery Improves with Music
  • The Chattering Brain – How Chronic Pain Throws our Cortex out of Sync
  • Subconscious Mind and the Limbic System

3 Responses

  1. Mister Houston says:
    March 8, 2010 at 10:25 pm

    It’s amazing how the brain works.

    Reply
  1. Simoleon Sense » Blog Archive » Weekly Wisdom Roundup #67 (The Weekly Best Of The Week!) says:
    February 28, 2010 at 2:51 pm

    [...] How Your Brain Groups Words – via Brain Blogger – When you say or hear a concrete noun, such as “apple”, what happens in your mind? Even without seeing a physical apple in front of you, your brain is drawing up an image of an apple, maybe the last one you ate or saw in the stores or on TV. A team of researchers at Carnegie Mellon used an fMRI (functional magnetic resonance image) machine to find out. Rather than using complex transparent concepts, like “honesty”, the team used simple words that convey physical, everyday objects to see which parts of the brain was activated. The goal was to see how the brain functions when we think of an object, rather than just trying to see an object in our mind. The brain was activated in many different parts for the simplest words, showing a complex, networked effect for even the easiest thoughts. [...]

    Reply
  2. Weekly Wisdom Roundup #67 (The Weekly Best Of The Week!) | Economic models | Alphaverse.com says:
    March 1, 2010 at 12:04 am

    [...] How Your Brain Groups Words – via Brain Blogger – When you say or hear a concrete noun, such as “apple”, what happens in your mind? Even without seeing a physical apple in front of you, your brain is drawing up an image of an apple, maybe the last one you ate or saw in the stores or on TV. A team of researchers at Carnegie Mellon used an fMRI (functional magnetic resonance image) machine to find out. Rather than using complex transparent concepts, like “honesty”, the team used simple words that convey physical, everyday objects to see which parts of the brain was activated. The goal was to see how the brain functions when we think of an object, rather than just trying to see an object in our mind. The brain was activated in many different parts for the simplest words, showing a complex, networked effect for even the easiest thoughts. [...]

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Subscribe without commenting


Popular Posts

  • Goal Setting - Pitfalls and Benefits
  • Why Some Human Brains Become Leaders, While Others Followers?
  • Clinical Psychologists' Perceptions of Persons with Mental Illness
  • Exercise - It Works For Depression
  • Deep Brain Stimulation - A New Frontier in Psychiatry
  • Pulling The Plug Too Soon?
  • Psychotropics and Youth, Part 3 - Equip Teachers with Prescription Pads?
  • Antidepressants Not Effective for Some Types of Depression
  • Mind your Immune System
  • Light at the End of the Tunnel or Too Much Carbon Dioxide?
  • Cults and Terrorism, Part 1 - The Problem of Definition
  • Societal Assumptions on Abuse and the Victim's Perspective
  • My Nephew and his Brain, Part 4 - Their Life Today

Future Posts

    Latest Posts

    • When Bipolar Patients Abuse Drugs – The Dual Diagnosis Dilemma
    • Peace and Conflict, Part 3 – Conflict Resolution
    • Addicted to Love
    • Cheers to a Decreased Risk of Arthritis
    • Breaking Up is Not So Hard to Do
    • It Takes a Village to Prevent Obesity
    • Peace and Conflict, Part 2 – The Role of Religion
    • Social Interaction at the Work Place – A Case Study Analysis
    • Drugs for Bulimia
    • Violent Video Games as a Learning Tool

    Comments

    • NosmoKING: Should we still have to take a
    • michael: It is up to people to spend th
    • Michele: But my argument with this arti
    • Chelee Bean: But my argument with this arti
    • Chelee Bean: Yep, valid point.
    • René: I'd have loved to disagree wit
    • sean: hi i am 41 now but had a mva
    • suny nomi: online forex trading a best bu
    • Evan: Thanks Isabella, I like the no
    • Guy Macher: Ottawa Citizen Newspaper 26 Au
    • Shade: well santas always been fat an
    • Ken Weiss: Your quote that fighting obesi
    Sponsored Links

    Life insurance, San Francisco Doctor, Best vitamins supplements, Online Criminal Justice Degrees , alcohol rehab , Tattoo , Rollup Banner Stands , Biomedical Research , Breast Cancer Treatment , Buy Celebrex , Cystic Fibrosis Disease , Pancreas Cancer , Affordable Health Insurance , Colon Cancer Treatment , Edgepark Medical , Mattress , Electronic Accessories , Astrology compatibility.

    Copyright © 2005-2010 Global Neuroscience Initiative Foundation (GNIF). All Rights Reserved.
    Disclaimer | Privacy Policy | RSS Feed | Log in | 0.789s
    9rules Network Member