Psychiatry & Psychology

Journal Retracts Autism Research

In 1998, a landmark study was published in the medical journal The Lancet. It was the first major research that suggested a link between the measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine and autism. Almost immediately following publication, the rates of vaccination plummeted and the incidence of measles escalated among children. Since then, the subject has been the source of much controversy, and much of the science has been disproved in other research. Now, the original journal admits it may have made a mistake in publishing the research in the first place.

Recently, the United Kingdom’s General Medical Council (GMC) determined that several elements of the original publication “Ileal-lymphoid-nodular hyperplasia, non-specific colitis, and pervasive developmental disorder in children,” authored by Dr. Andrew Wakefield, are incorrect. Specifically, the GMC found evidence that the authors did not receive the necessary ethical approval for the investigation and they misrepresented the children’s diseases. The GMC issued a startling reprimand that asserted Dr. Wakefield and colleagues showed a “callous disregard” for children and acted “dishonestly” when conducting the research. It turns out that Dr. Wakefield was being paid by a group of parents who believed their children had been harmed by the MMR vaccine. Dr. Wakefield insists that he was motivated by a genuine concern for the welfare of the children.

AutismThe original research involved 12 children ranging in age from 3 to 10 years. Eleven of them were boys. Parents of 8 of the children linked the MMR vaccine to the onset of behavioral symptoms associated with autism, psychosis, or encephalitis. The authors concluded that the exposure to the MMR vaccine could not be ruled out as a cause for developmental regression in previously normal children. In 2004, The Lancet issued a partial retraction of the research, but argued they were right to publish the research to promote new ideas and new ways of thinking. In doing so, they sparked a decade of intense controversy and a decline in vaccination rates around the developed world. Now, The Lancet goes further and fully retracts the paper from its published record. Hindsight has led them to rethink their original motives.

No one yet knows exactly what causes autism, or any of the related spectrum of disorders. There is strong evidence for a genetic link, but environmental exposure to toxins cannot be ruled out. New reports of exposure to known mutagens and environmental risk factors before conception appear to be related to an increased risk for autism. A new hypothesis claims that living in urban areas, at higher altitudes, or with high levels of precipitation may decrease sun exposure, increase risk for Vitamin D deficiency, and, therefore, increase the risk for autism. Until large-scale, ethically-compliant, scientifically-sound research in confirmed, the causes and implications of autism will never be known. Until then, everyone should take heed not to believe everything they read – even in prestigious medical journals.

References

Herbert MR (2010). Contributions of the environment and environmentally vulnerable physiology to autism spectrum disorders. Current opinion in neurology PMID: 20087183

Kinney, D., Barch, D., Chayka, B., Napoleon, S., & Munir, K. (2010). Environmental risk factors for autism: Do they help cause de novo genetic mutations that contribute to the disorder? Medical Hypotheses, 74 (1), 102-106 DOI: 10.1016/j.mehy.2009.07.052

WAKEFIELD, A., MURCH, S., ANTHONY, A., LINNELL, J., CASSON, D., MALIK, M., BERELOWITZ, M., DHILLON, A., THOMSON, M., & HARVEY, P. (1998). Ileal-lymphoid-nodular hyperplasia, non-specific colitis, and pervasive developmental disorder in children The Lancet, 351 (9103), 637-641 DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(97)11096-0

Retraction – Ileal-lymphoid-nodular hyperplasia, non-specific colitis, and pervasive developmental disorder in children. The Lancet.

WAKEFIELD, A., MURCH, S., ANTHONY, A., LINNELL, J., CASSON, D., MALIK, M., BERELOWITZ, M., DHILLON, A., THOMSON, M., & HARVEY, P. (1998). Ileal-lymphoid-nodular hyperplasia, non-specific colitis, and pervasive developmental disorder in children The Lancet, 351 (9103), 637-641 DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(97)11096-0


8 Comments/Trackbacks

You can follow any responses to this article through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Ramesh Phillips
February 03, 2010 | Permalink

It is a pity that very little coverage of this issue names the journalist who is responsible for exposing this scandal: Brian Deer of the London Sunday Times.

Chuck
February 03, 2010 | Permalink

For those unfamiliar with Dr. John Cannell’s Vitamin D Theory of Autism see the following link: http://www.vitamindcouncil.org/health/autism/vit-D-theory-autism.shtml or simply go to the Vitamin D Council web site and click on the tab for” Autism”. Dr. Cannell has done his research and has considerable evidence to support his theory. And in the end it does no harm for mothers to be to maintain healthy, natural levels of activated vitamin D, at least 50 ng/ml in the blood- year round.

Johnny
February 03, 2010 | Permalink

Great job. I’ve posted a link to here from the Faster Times.

ClinicallyClueless
February 04, 2010 | Permalink

Having worked with developmentally disabled persons for 17 years, I see many parents trying to find the “great cure.” While I love their persistence, I’ve also seen children die unnessarilly due to not obtaining vaccinations. This new study can have damaging effects even though it was retracted.

shafaq
February 05, 2010 | Permalink

12 children were taken as subjects for a very controversial research , the results of which could have been very drastic; especially if the research were known to some of the developing countries,… where vaccination results have been poor since decades.
the responsibility of publishing a research is more than doing one, considering the power of media these days, which has grown so fast and so strong that people think media n live media!

April
February 18, 2010 | Permalink

I must admit that it’s quite surprising to know that a bunch of professional doctors would receive payment to research on the MMR vaccine being related to autism in children, risking their professional credibility, if proven wrong. Hhhm….this is such a controversial issue, similar to the Aspartame research.

We all know for a fact that certain chemicals or synthetic drugs have an adverse reaction in the body even if it’s meant to combat a certain disease or meant to boost the immune system.

Drug companies should do further intensive research before approving a certain drug or vaccine to be safe for use, to avoid matters like these.

Lettyv
February 21, 2010 | Permalink

There’s autism fraud all around us. Recall the case of Amanda Baggs? Or how about Donna Williams? She’s Aspergers, not autism. Amanda is a psychogenic case of autism, a real no no. Autism is a spectrum disorder, however, more and more, Severe autism is not being shown to the public. There is a great video on you tube called “severe autism when there is no answer” The video is made by a man with Aspergers (a fellow aspie) who also has an autistic son. Very enlightening. Youll be surprised.

Trackbacks


Leave a Reply

Subscribe Without Commenting

Friday, March 19, 2010

Sponsored Links

Neuroscience & Neurology

March 06, 2010 | 6 Comments | By Simi Agarwal, DDS

Why Some Human Brains Become Leaders, While Others Followers?

More In Neuroscience & Neurology


Neuroscience & Neurology

Opinion

February 01, 2010 | 1 Comment | By Jennifer Gibson, PharmD

Crossing the Line from Physician to Journalist

More In Opinion


Opinion

Psychiatry & Psychology

March 12, 2010 | 3 Comments | By Shaheen E Lakhan, MS, MEd, PhD, MD

Deep Brain Stimulation – A New Frontier in Psychiatry

More In Psychiatry & Psychology