Income Inequality and Health Outcomes




During the last several decades, industrialized countries have experienced a growing gap between the rich and the poor. This income inequality is believed to damage health, with even modest associations between inequality and health outcomes having substantial ramifications for society as a whole. While most analyses of income inequality and health have revealed inconsistent results, a new meta-analysis published in a recent issue of British Medical Journal (BMJ) supports the link between income inequality and mortality and self-rated health.

Income inequality is measured by the Gini coefficient, a measure of income disparity within a population. The Gini coefficient ranges between 0 and 1, with 0 signifying complete income equality (everyone receives the same income) and 1 signifying complete inequality (one individual receives all the income). Most European countries have a Gini coefficient of approximately 0.3, while the United States has a Gini coefficient close to 0.4. The Gini coefficient of the entire world has been estimated at approximately 0.6.

The BMJ analysis systematically examined 9 cohort and 19 cross-sectional studies involving a total of more than 61 million subjects to describe the association between the Gini coefficient and mortality and self-reported health status. Overall, the investigators concluded that people living in regions with high income inequality (a higher Gini coefficient) had an increased risk of premature death, independent of their individual socioeconomic status, age, or gender. The increase mortality risk amounted to 8% per 0.05 increase in the Gini coefficient. There were stronger associations between income inequality and poor health in samples with a higher Gini coefficient, studies conducted after 1990, and studies with a follow-up duration of more than 7 years.

This study also seems to confirm a theoretical “threshold effect” above which the disparities in health outcomes are seen. By the authors’ estimation, the Gini must be above 0.3 before the adverse health effects are apparent. If the associations and estimations are true, the authors calculate that 1.5 million deaths could be avoided in 30 developed countries if the Gini coefficients were leveled to 0.3 or below. However, very little data is available on income inequality or health outcomes in developing nations, which would likely adjust the findings.

Income inequality is believed to damage health outcomes in two ways. First, an unequal society usually involves a considerable portion of the population that is living in poverty, and many studies have determined that poverty is bad for overall health outcomes. The greater the income inequality, the more impoverished citizens, and the more who are in poor health. The second, less easily defined, explanation is that income inequality is also detrimental to the more affluent members of society, since these citizens experience psychosocial stress from the inequality and loss of social cohesion. The public health burdens of the second situation are obviously broader, but much less quantifiable, and more controversial.

It is nearly impossible to confirm a causal relationship between income inequality and health outcomes. And no one supports the redistribution of income just to improve health outcomes. Simply improving health education and increasing access to health care of the socially and economically disadvantaged — two issues that could use improvement no matter which end of the Gini spectrum a country falls — could level the proverbial playing field. But, many policy makers support, at the very least, acknowledging the link between macroeconomic conditions and individual health outcomes when drafting economic and health care policy or legislation for local and international communities.

References

Kondo, N., Sembajwe, G., Kawachi, I., van Dam, R., Subramanian, S., & Yamagata, Z. (2009). Income inequality, mortality, and self rated health: meta-analysis of multilevel studies BMJ, 339 (nov10 2) DOI: 10.1136/bmj.b4471

SUBRAMANIAN, S., & KAWACHI, I. (2006). Whose health is affected by income inequality? A multilevel interaction analysis of contemporaneous and lagged effects of state income inequality on individual self-rated health in the United States Health & Place, 12 (2), 141-156 DOI: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2004.11.001

LYNCH, J., SMITH, G., HARPER, S., HILLEMEIER, M., ROSS, N., KAPLAN, G., & WOLFSON, M. (2004). Is Income Inequality a Determinant of Population Health? Part 1. A Systematic Review The Milbank Quarterly, 82 (1), 5-99 DOI: 10.1111/j.0887-378X.2004.00302.x

Ichida, Y., Kondo, K., Hirai, H., Hanibuchi, T., Yoshikawa, G., & Murata, C. (2009). Social capital, income inequality and self-rated health in Chita peninsula, Japan: a multilevel analysis of older people in 25 communities Social Science & Medicine, 69 (4), 489-499 DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.05.006

  • The information presented in this article is very good, but I think that it is a gross oversimplification to tie economics to health in this way. For example, the obesity statistics in the United States are very strange: for the first time in history, it’s the poor people who are getting fat. It seems that economic factors are relevant, but the overall picture would be explained much better in terms of the distribution of survival skills. While the ability to obtain financial well-being represents one set of survival skills, the ability to choose your food wisely is another. Still another would be the skills to avoid disease and toxins in the environment, and another would be mate selection. All of these factors have been shown to impact people’s health, and must all be taken into account if we are to find a solution.

  • ” for the first time in history, it’s the poor people who are getting fat.”

    that’s because the cheap, overly-processed food is high in fat and calories

  • Pingback: Twitted by mike__stout()

  • Well, that was about developed countries. What about developing countries? Can anyone dare to calculate the Gini coefficient here? It must be horrible. There is huge difference between well equipped private hospitals and 18th century govt. hospitals here… same as in slums and palaces. You get well shaped gym joining high class people, health ignorant overeating middle class fat people and poor people dying due to starvation… all in one country. If such a drastic situation, finding a solution is very difficult.

  • Pingback: ResearchBlogging.org News » Blog Archive » Editor’s Selections: Chilly sleep deprivation, health outcomes tied to income inequality, ineffective Ginkgo, and insulin resistance as a protective mechanism()

  • I work psych emergency in the ER, handling primarily Medicaid and self-pay cases. Not only is it staggering to see the disparity in immediate care between these patients and those in a higher socioeconomic class, but the difference in follow up resources is equally as disturbing.

  • Karen

    Can You Feel Prevention?

    The Lates Research Shows

    45% reduction rate of prostate cancer by eating 10 servings of tomatoe-based food per week

    76% reduction of breast cancer by eating one serving daily of broccoli, brussel sprounts, cauliflower or cabbage.

    30% reduction in heart disease in men whose diets increased the amount of vitamin C and beta carotene

    68% reduction of stroke rate in women who ate five servings of carrots per week

    43% reduction of age-related macular degeneration by eating dark green, leafy vegetables like spinach or collard greens.

    “If people are falling over the edge of a clipp & sustaining injuires, the problem could be dealt with by stationing ambulances at the bottom or erecting a fence at the top. We put too much effort into the positioning of the ambulances 7 too Little into the approach of erecting fences.” – Dr. Denis Burkit

    No one walks around saying: “Gee, I feel like I’m not getting a cavity today!” You brush your teeth daily to prevent a cavity: but you don’t feel anything earth shattering. What do you do every day to prevent degenerative disease?

    Whole food nutrition and supplementing with it is where to start

    Question and emails – kja.freedom@hotmail.com

  • I enjoyed your comments April. Yes, tough times are very difficult; but if worry re your circumstances becomes obsessive, then that dynamic is what needs to get handled first. And you’re right, “this too shall come to pass.”

  • Being stress about the economy and over your income is a sign of depression. Being concerned with your living conditions is reasonable but being stressed about it, leads to frustration and depression. Life is a challenge that we all face. How we solve our problems and issues without being affected by it, can be mind boggling and confusing. Everything should have a balance. If you allow your mind to worry, then that will be your first problem that needs to be resolved right away. The rest will just follow. Positive thinking gives positive results and gives the body an over-all well being of good self-esteem and inspiration. Personally I always make it a point to smile and laugh at my troubles but at the same time, use this as a motivation to improve myself in times of adversity. My secret formula in life is smile, work hard, never lose hope and pray always…. for better days to come, for ….. “this too shall come to pass!”

  • Chandler

    Its sad that so many of our decisions are financial ones. We have to weigh everything and its importance by how much it costs. Health is unfortunately included in this.

Jennifer Gibson, PharmD

Jennifer Gibson, PharmD, is a practicing clinical pharmacist and medical writer/editor with experience in researching and preparing scientific publications, developing public relations materials, creating educational resources and presentations, and editing technical manuscripts. She is the owner of Excalibur Scientific, LLC.
See All Posts By The Author

Do not miss out ever again. Subscribe to get our newsletter delivered to your inbox a few times a month.