Brain Blogger Home
  • Home
  • About
    • Editor's Note
    • Contributors
  • Advertise
  • Archives
    • By Author
    • By Topic
    • By Year
    • By Month
  • Contact
  • Contribute
  • Topics
    • Popular
    • Series
    • Video
    • Carnivals
  • Sitemap
  • Subscribe
  • Neuroscience & Neurology
  • Psychology & Psychiatry
  • Health & Healthcare
  • More >>
    • BioPsychoSocial Health
    • Complementary & Alternative Medicine
    • Drugs & Clinical Trials
    • History of Medicine
    • Law & Politics
    • Living with a Brain Disorder
    • Opinion
    • Site News
    • Stigmatization
Brain Blogger RSS Feed

Brain Blogger Feed - 3500+ Readers

Follow BB:

Brain Blogger on FaceBook Brain Blogger on twitter Brain Blogger on Flickr Brain Blogger on YouTube
Drugs & Clinical Trials
November 30, 2009

One Size Does Not Fit All

By Jennifer Gibson, PharmD | 3 Comments | Share | Print | Email | Tweet | Like | 1+
Test tubes

Up to half of drug therapy is ineffective, according to recent statistics. This leaves patients’ diseases untreated, but also places them at risk for side effects and drug interactions. The reason for the unpredictability in the effectiveness of medication comes from a variety of factors: individual differences in enzymes that metabolize drugs, variations in drug transporters, ethnic differences, and environmental changes. For decades, the idea of personalized medicine — assessing and evaluating individual differences to tailor medicine and therapy regimens for the best results — has brought about new drugs and led to effective treatment of several diseases. However, now clinicians and researchers are returning to old drugs to optimize personalized therapy.

Researching and developing new drugs based on genetics is costly and time consuming. Reinvesting time and money in older drugs to improve the effectiveness and safety may produce more “bang for the buck” in the move towards personalized medicine. Research is increasingly focused on learning why existing drugs work better in some people than others. Genetic markers are offering clues to why patients respond well, or not, to cancer protocols, cardiovascular drugs, psychiatric medications, and kidney disease treatments, to name a few. Someday, perhaps drug companies will move away from continuously developing newer, costlier agents and focus on using the old drugs for new tricks.

Many new drugs come to market with accompanying diagnostic and genetic tests to establish safety and efficacy goals, but these are costly analyses. Simple tests, though, such as blood tests or cheek swabs, may be useful in determining if a patient will respond well to a commonly prescribed medication. These fast, relatively inexpensive tests could improve the overall cost-effectiveness of drug therapy.

The complex diseases that plague society are not the result of one gene or event, but, rather, a dynamic combination of factors. By evaluating individual genomes and studying the relationship to environmental factors, clinicians will learn how to identify susceptible groups of people and tailor disease prevention strategies and optimize treatment protocols. Physicians and pharmacists will be able to determine which patients will respond well to chemotherapy regimens, who will experience adverse drug reactions from a cholesterol drug, and who will have worsening asthma from an inhaled medication.

The advent of personalized medicine and the departure from the current one-size-fits-all health care model requires a paradigm shift for patients and providers. New standards will emerge for the management of genetic information and education will be paramount for clinicians and patients. There are still more questions than answers regarding personalized medicine and tailoring therapy to each individual, but, hopefully, personalized medicine will be a large piece of the future health care puzzle, allowing more preventive medicine and evidence-based treatment selection.

References

Abrahams, E., Ginsburg, G., & Silver, M. (2005). The Personalized Medicine Coalition American Journal of PharmacoGenomics, 5 (6), 345-355 DOI: 10.2165/00129785-200505060-00002

Dean, C. (2009). Personalized Medicine: Boon or Budget-Buster? Annals of Pharmacotherapy, 43 (5), 958-962 DOI: 10.1345/aph.1L563

Leeder, J., & Spielberg, S. (2009). Personalized Medicine: Reality and Reality Checks Annals of Pharmacotherapy, 43 (5), 963-966 DOI: 10.1345/aph.1M065

Tan DS, Thomas GV, Garrett MD, et al. Biomarker-Driven Early Clinical Trials in Oncology: A Paradigm Shift in Drug Development. Cancer J. September/October 2009;15(5):406-420.

Rovin, B., McKinley, A., & Birmingham, D. (2009). Can We Personalize Treatment for Kidney Diseases? Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, 4 (10), 1670-1676 DOI: 10.2215/CJN.04140609

Wiechec, E., & Hansen, L. (2009). The effect of genetic variability on drug response in conventional breast cancer treatment European Journal of Pharmacology, 625 (1-3), 122-130 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2009.08.045

Campbell, D., & Levitt, P. (2008). Future of individualized psychiatric treatment Pharmacogenomics, 9 (5), 493-495 DOI: 10.2217/14622416.9.5.493

Jennifer Gibson, PharmD

Dr. Gibson, PharmD, is a practicing clinical pharmacist and medical writer/editor with experience in researching and preparing scientific publications, developing public relations materials, creating educational resources and presentations, and editing technical manuscripts. She is the owner of Excalibur Scientific, LLC.

Related Articles

  • Stressed By His Short Allele
  • Risks of Personalized Medicine
  • The Future of Biosimilars
  • Should Doctors Engage in Racial Profiling?
  • Is Knowledge Power? Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing
  • Cancer – To Screen or Not to Screen?
  • Ethnic Medicine – Beyond Bidil

3 Responses

  1. Todd says:
    December 1, 2009 at 12:08 pm

    Agree with the statements in this blog. Companion diagnostics needs to be affordable, and that means we need an industrial revolution in the way companion diagnostic tests are delpoyed.

    Reply
  1. Poor Drug Therapy Results Call for a More Personalized Approach « Personalized Health Care at Ohio State says:
    November 30, 2009 at 2:21 pm

    [...] Jennifer Gibson, clinical phramacist, blogs about the future of personalized medicine in her One Size Does Not Fit All post on BrainBlogger. Gibson cites recent statistics showing that nearly half of all drug therapy [...]

    Reply
  2. Tweaking the Brain » Blog Archiv » Want successful treatment for the brain? Personalize! says:
    December 5, 2009 at 11:41 am

    [...] Gibson, on brainblogger.com, has a new compelling post “One Size Does Not Fit All” in which she reports, “[u]p to half of drug therapy is ineffective, according to [...]

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Subscribe without commenting


Popular Posts

  • The Love Drug
  • Women After Sex
  • Fatty Acids and Suicide Risk
  • Mind Games - Science's Attempts at Thought Control
  • Risks of Personalized Medicine
  • Mental Health Disorders Prevalent Among Youth Worldwide
  • Is Giftedness Nothing More than Good Genes?
  • Behind the Masks - The Mysteries of Dissociative Identity Disorder
  • The NeuroSocial Network
  • Inside Your Brain on Holiday

Future Posts

  • A Nicotine Patch a Day Keeps the Cognitive Impairment Away

Latest Posts

  • The Many Emerging Roles of Astrocytes
  • Diabetes Impairs Cognition
  • Media Violence Leads to Real Violence
  • Intelligence – Are You Holding Back Your Brain?
  • Childhood Aggression Predicts Health Care Use Later in Life
  • The Brain’s Border Patrol – Blood Brain Barrier
  • Risks of Personalized Medicine
  • BED-head and Obesity – Food for Thought
  • Salvia Divinorum – DEA Control over Magic in the Mint
  • Mighty Microglia – The Brain’s Immune Cells Key to Treating Brain Diseases

Comments

  • Matt: I'm just interested in hearing
  • Carla Easley: If everyone adopted the "Growt
  • Isabel (retired RN): I second that query for resear
  • David: How about some citations to pe
  • MrsK: @Dawn - I agree with your stat
  • andrew: this is really cool!! i love t
  • Dawn: 18. Dawn Says:Wow, some o
  • Richard Kensinger, MSW: We understand that there are m
  • Lisamarie Antonicelli: In response to Diabetes Impair
  • : Hey Gang, There is a wonderfu
  • Alexis remm: sorry for the errors
  • Alexis remm: Ok both have reason just some
Sponsored Links

chinese wholesale, memory improvement, web design brisbane, Autism News Blog, Pharmaceutical Training, Neurotherapist, HGH, Banner Stands , Buy Prevacid , Atomic PR , hospital drug treatment , Blood Test Locations

Copyright © 2005-2012 Brain Blogger sponsored by Global Neuroscience Initiative Foundation (GNIF). All Rights Reserved.
Disclaimer | Privacy Policy | Feed | Log in | ISSN 1931-6224 | 0.860s
9rules Network Member