Brain Blogger Home
  • Home
  • About
    • Editor's Note
    • Contributors
  • Advertise
  • Archives
    • By Author
    • By Topic
    • By Year
    • By Month
  • Contact
  • Contribute
  • Topics
    • Popular
    • Series
    • Video
    • Carnivals
  • Sitemap
  • Subscribe
  • Neuroscience & Neurology
  • Psychology & Psychiatry
  • Health & Healthcare
  • More >>
    • BioPsychoSocial Health
    • Complementary & Alternative Medicine
    • Drugs & Clinical Trials
    • History of Medicine
    • Law & Politics
    • Living with a Brain Disorder
    • Opinion
    • Site News
    • Stigmatization
  • View Archives
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • By Month
  • By Author

Follow BB:

Brain Blogger on FaceBook Brain Blogger on twitter Brain Blogger on Flickr Brain Blogger on YouTube
Advertisement
Neuroscience & Neurology
November 17, 2008

School Bullies – Is the Amygdala to Blame?

By Melissa E. Malka, BSc | 3 Comments | Share | Print | Email | Tweet | Like | 1+

Countless studies have focused on the subject of bullying, and the latest even suggest an interesting paradox: is bullying caused by a lack of empathy for others or, surprisingly, by too much empathy? Because, although all of us react in some way to seeing others in pain, we don’t all react in the same way. Scientists are asking, could an empathic response to others in pain cause enough emotional distress in some adolescents to actually cause them to respond aggressively? Here lie the two big hypotheses and they’re rather contradictory.

A recently published University of Chicago study tested the response from two different groups of adolescents to viewing others in pain. One group had been previously diagnosed with CD, a mental disorder associated with increased risk of incarceration, injury, depression, homicide, and an overall disregard for rules and laws; the other group was an asymptomatic control group. The teens were exposed to various stimuli, which showed individuals in accidental pain and individuals in pain that was intentionally caused by another, in a functional MRI (fMRI) scanner.

MRIThe results of the fMRI testing showed that in both groups, the “pain matrix” was selectively activated during the accidental sequences. But, the patterns of activation during the pain-caused-by-other sequences varied significantly between the two groups. Three specific regions, the amygdala, striatum, and temporal poles were activated in the aggressive group, but not the control. Contrary to previous studies, bullies may actually exhibit a greater than average neural response to those in pain.

As for the amygdala, a crucial player in the formation of emotional reactions, its degree of activation was positively correlated to the number of aggressive acts of the participants in the study leading scientists think to that the activity in the amygdala, coupled with the striatum, creates a positive response for those aggressive youth: pleasure.

The researchers called this finding “intriguing” but we’re still far from understanding the complex nature of aggressive responses and why bullies bully. At least we know violent TV isn’t all to blame.

Reference

J DECETY, K MICHALSKA, Y AKITSUKI, B LAHEY (2008). Atypical empathic responses in adolescents with aggressive conduct disorder: A functional MRI investigation Biological Psychology DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2008.09.004

Melissa E. Malka, BSc

Melissa E. Malka, BSc, holds a bachelors in Molecular Biology with a focus on neuropsychology, specifically the biology behind psychology. She is also pursuing a Masters degree and planning to attend medical school.

Related Articles

  • Media Violence Leads to Real Violence
  • The Chattering Brain – How Chronic Pain Throws our Cortex out of Sync
  • Irritable Bowel Syndrome Linked to Abnormal Brain Activity
  • Chronic Pain and the Brain
  • What Make Us Moral?
  • Understanding How Color Is Perceived in the Brain
  • A Baby’s Smile – Mom’s Natural High

3 Responses

  1. Neuroskeptic says:
    November 17, 2008 at 12:43 pm

    For a couple of skeptical discussions of this see:
    neuroskeptic.blogspot.com/2008/11/bbc-bullies-have-bad-brains.html

    and

    http://neurocritic.blogspot.com/2008/11/hah-ha.html

    Reply
  2. The Neurocritic says:
    November 19, 2008 at 2:05 pm

    There’s another good critique of this study at Slate, Bullies Like Bullying.

    Reply
  3. Neuroskeptic says:
    November 19, 2008 at 4:16 pm

    You’re only saying it’s good because they link to you…:P
    Although to be fair, it is very good.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Subscribe without commenting


Advertisement

Popular Posts

  • Humanistic Theory and Therapy, Applied to the Psychotic Individual
  • Can Age-Related Forgetfulness be Overcome?
  • Music Therapy for the Alzheimer’s Disease Patient
  • Long-lasting Effects of Meditation
  • Ketogenic Diet for Epilepsy and Other Neurological Disorders

Future Posts

  • Improving Emotional Intelligence in Psychosis with Art Therapy
  • Multifaceted Causes of Obsessive Compulsive Disorder
  • Math Anxiety – Dealing with Fear of Failure
  • Boosting Cognitive Performance by… Chewing?
  • Can You ‘Catch’ Depression?
Advertisement

Latest Posts

  • Out-Group Discrimination Fuels Anger, Risk-Taking and Vigilance
  • Understanding How Color Is Perceived in the Brain
  • Psychopharmacological Drug Development in A Depression?
  • Teaching the Brain to Calm Itself
  • Horror on Seymour Avenue

Comments

  • Jarome: Interesting post indeed and wi
  • Dean Sanders: Take the money that you would
  • becoming a pick up artist: Hi, after reading this remarka
  • Kim: It's difficult for people who
  • teapigs: obviously just like your websi
Sponsored

GNLD NeoLife, neurofeedback, Free Shipping, chinese wholesale, GNLD,  Buy Cigarettes Online, Abendkleider lang  Retractable Banner Stands ,   Buy Genotropin

Copyright © 2005-2013 Brain Blogger sponsored by Global Neuroscience Initiative Foundation (GNIF). All Rights Reserved.
Disclaimer | Brain Blogger Privacy Policy | UBM Medical Network Privacy Policy | Feed | Log in | ISSN 1931-6224 | 0.710s