What is Intelligence?

Intelligence has been discussed throughout much of human history. Socrates gave one definition of intelligence: “I know that I am intelligent, because I know that I know nothing.” Intelligence over the years has been defined as such diverse things as understanding others, knowledge gained, who you surround yourself by, what you accomplish, and the ability to reason. Before the 19th century, intelligence was solely in the realm of philosophy. Franz Joseph Gall, who started the phrenology movement, sought to localize intelligence (among other things) in the brain, which was in turn measured on the skull. While many of the ideas of phrenology were inaccurate, the idea of quantifying individual differences and localizing those differences onto the brain was an important one. Over the years, researchers started using better methods of research and understanding individual differences.

Then in the early 20th century, a French researcher was asked by the French government to come up with a way to identify children who would and would not benefit from schooling. He developed the first modern intelligence test. This first intelligence test quantified attention, verbal skills, and memory. About 10 years later, Lewis Terman, a psychologist at Stanford, adapted it for use in the United States. These tests provided an Intelligence Quotient as the quantification of intelligence. It was quickly applied by the military to identify who would make good officers an who should be rejected from service. Charles Spearman, an English psychologist, developed the idea that many disparate components of intelligence all represented an underlying general factor of intelligence (g). This had a large impact on the idea of intelligence and on the development of future measures of intelligence.

LightbulbDavid Wechsler developed an intelligence test, largely based on Spearman’s idea of g; this test is the most widely used intelligence test in the United States. The most recent version measures verbal comprehension, perceptual reasoning, working memory, and processing speed. There is considerable controversy whether processing speed — which roughly is how quickly someone can perceive and process new information or perform an action — should be considered a measure of intelligence. Other people balk at assigning a single number to intelligence, especially when there is not a universally agreed upon definition of intelligence. Still others feel that traditional intelligence tests provide a too narrow view of intelligence. One such researcher, Howard Gardner, initially proposed that there are seven intelligences (this has since been modified to include at least two more), including bodily-kinesthetic, linguistic, interpersonal, visual-spatial, and so forth. A problem with his theory is that his intelligences are not easily measured (however, some people would not see this as a fault).

What do the readers think about intelligence? Do IQ tests provide a good measure of intelligence? In other words, is it a meaningful concept? Does Gardner’s theory fit better? Is intelligence even a useful concept to measure? Was Oscar Wilde correct when he said, “The intellect is not a serious thing, and never has been. It is an instrument on which one plays, that is all”?

  • Pingback: Rich Life Carnival()

  • Pingback: Carnival of Postive Thinking()

  • Pingback: » Blog Archive » Blog Carnival - eleventh edition()

  • Pingback: Encephalon #58 - Decision Making | Highlight HEALTH()

  • Chandrika

    Thanks, got the meaning of INTELLIGENCE/IQ.

  • Pingback: Why Some Human Brains Become Leaders, While Others Followers | Brain Blogger()

  • Well I definitely enjoyed reading it. This subject provided by you is very effective for proper planning.

  • onergk69

    Traditional GIQ consists oofverbal, mathematical & problem solving applications. We can map it in humans on the so-called “Bell Curve”, which ranges from profound retardation to ultra GIQ. The highest on record is 228.

    IQ is clearly a complex construct. I think H. Gardner is correct in IDing at least 8 IQ dimensions.

    GIQ correlates about 0.6 with post-secondary performance; and shows a correlation of 0.4 with professional success. So, clearly, there are othr important mediating factors.

    In re: to retardation, 80% that we find in the world, is due to psychosocial deprivation! Dendrites do not proliferate without plenty of stimulation.

    All in all, I find it to be an important aspect of the human experience.


  • kevin Keough

    Check out Stephen Murdoch’s book “IQ:The History of a Failed Idea”. Great read.

Jared Tanner, PhD

Jared Tanner has a Ph.D. in clinical psychology with an emphasis in neuropsychology. His interests are mainly neuroimaging and neuroanatomy. He spends his research time looking at the structure of gray and white matter in the brains of people with Alzheimer's disease and Parkinson's disease. With a focus on neuropsychology, he is also interested in how normal and abnormal brain structure relates to cognitive and behavioral functioning.
See All Posts By The Author

Do not miss out ever again. Subscribe to get our newsletter delivered to your inbox a few times a month.