Opinion
HIPAA Doesn’t Exist For Doctors
Recently a very popular colleague of mine was hospitalized. He happened to be hospitalized at the facility where he works and thus you can imagine he was inundated with visitors and friends wanting to wish him well. Unfortunately, the terms of his hospitalization were emergent and thus he did not have a choice in where he went for treatment. His frequent visitors coming into the room began to hamper his recover and his family was forced to try and enforce privacy rules and HIPAA.
This only worked on the surface. When the hospital was called, they did not reveal that my colleague was in the hospital. They also did not reveal his room number. But upon scouring the hospital and connecting with nurses people started locating his room and once again started dropping by unannounced. Imagine the nurses trying to protect the privacy of the patient from a bunch of doctors wearing white coats!
Ultimately, his family insisted on a premature discharge in order to protect their privacy.
What do you do in this situation? Well it turns out that the physician did not want his colleagues to know about the extent of his condition because he planned to return to practice after recovery. Surely one can appreciate the damage rumors can do to a physician? For example, would you go to see a physician if you knew he had a pre-existing medical condition that might affect your treatment or perhaps affect him during a surgical case?
My colleague actually told me that his family had to scold the nurses because his physician friends who were not on the treatment team were perusing his medical record. This is clearly a HIPAA and privacy violation and should not happen.
While this scenario may exist in the case where a celebrity is hospitalized, it is most problematic when a physician is hospitalized. Unfortunately HIPAA applies to the average everday patient but not to doctors in their own hospitals.
Related Articles
10 Comments
Jake
FYI
Yes HIPAA applies to everyone regardless (doctors, nurses, celebrities, regular patients, homeless, etc. - lets not be melodramatic and make poor generalized claims). Where was the medical director or CEO - he or she could have quickly and efficiently put a stop to the issue. Also, the family should have gotten in touch with the privacy officer or the OCR and file a complaint. It sounds like the hospital needs to be encouraged to better understand and enforce the federal and state laws regarding patient privacy.
The field of infertility treatment is such a privacy-sensitive one that although I am on two medical school faculties, I do not allow regular rotations of residents to my practice as they would likely encounter the many faculty, residents, nurses and med students who come to me for care. Whenever we have a celebrity, we hold a meeting to discuss the serious implications of our staff even sharing with their closest family members the fact that that patient is being seen. We have to bring the patients through the back entrance or see them after hours. It is EXTREMELY difficult keeping a lid on this type of thing, but so far we have not known of any obvious leaks. For non-celebrity patients, we have had a few encounters of neighbors or church acquaintances running into each other in the waiting rooms. Sometimes, they will reluctantly say hi, but there have been times where they just deliberately ignore each other and then later tell me that they know the other patient and would ask to be scheduled at times not to coincide with the other patient. It never took a rigid regulation like HIPAA for us to have these policies in place.
This situation is very unfortunate. HIPAA enforcement in situations such as this are commonly left to the nurses who are taking care of the patient, which is unfair for the nurses and not often helpful for the patients or their families.
The hospital was required to provide a Notice of Privacy Practices to the patient at the time he was admitted, assuming he had not also been admitted previously (i.e., between April 2003 and now). It should have contained the process for him or his designees, in this case his family members, to file a privacy complaint with the hospital. Even if he was admitted emergently, the hospital’s requirement was to get the Notice to him as soon as it was medically practical for them to do so; they could also have provided the Notice to his family members.
The family should have immediately contacted the hospital’s HIPAA Privacy Officer (the hospital is required by statute to have one). If the Privacy Officer did not immediately ensure that the kibosh was put on what was going on, the family should have contacted senior staff (CEO, Sr VPs, etc.) and complained. Of course, they may not have known this if they were never provided with the Notice of Privacy Practices, or didn’t have the time to read it.
The Privacy Officer should have contacted the hospital’s HIPAA Security Officer (again, the hospital is required to have one), who should have immediately started utilizing whatever process the hospital has in place to track hospital system users, so that the snoopers could have been caught in the act and disciplined immediately.
The family have up to six months from the time of the privacy breaches to file an official complaint against the hospital with Health & Human Services, and as a HIPAA patient advocate I strongly encourage them to do so. The process is relatively quick and painless: http://www.hhs.gov/ocr/hipaa — the complaint form can be found on this page. I encourage the author of this blog to follow-up on this with the patient and/or his family. HHS has received 40,000+ privacy complaints since April, 2003, and yet has fined only ONE hospital in 5+ years. Hospitals such as this one will continue to allow patients’ privacy rights to be violated unless and until active complaints are received.
I also encourage the patient or his family members to contact the senior leadership of this hospital and let them know that the family will be filing a complaint with HHS. They should include in the letter their expectation that the hospital will take steps to stop this type of occurrence both with members of its workforce as well as all privileged providers who may or may not be staff members.
I am establishing a patient advocacy practice specifically to deal with HIPAA Privacy & Security issues — for exactly the reasons as stated in this blog — patients and their families do not know their rights regarding their privacy and the security of their healthcare information.
Ailan Medici
For example, would you go to see a physician if you knew he had a pre-existing medical condition that might affect your treatment or perhaps affect him during a surgical case?
Are you seriously suggesting that a physician has a right to hide the fact that he has a medical condition that might harm a patient during surgery?
Trackbacks
- Sep 16, 2008 | Die Krankheitskarte
- Sep 20, 2008 | Carnival of Healing #156 |
- Sep 22, 2008 | FitBuff.com's Total Mind and Body Fitness Blog
- Sep 27, 2008 | The 157th Carnival of Healing
- Oct 01, 2008 | Healthcare Economist · 700 billion reasons to read the Health Wonk Review
Leave a Reply
Tuesday, December 2, 2008
- The Anti-Psychiatry Movement
- Vaccines - A Two-Edged Sword
- Should Doctors Have Guns?
- Extremist Muslim Doctors Do More Than Heal
- Woman Comparable to Men in Domestic Violence: Stereotypes and their Consequences
- God And Religion: Is It All In Our Heads?
- Anti-Smoking Campaign Doesn't Mess Around
- The Bipolar Trend
- Are You Vegetarian? How Do You Get Enough Protein?
- The Implications of Implanted Chips
- The Science of Brain Freeze
- Is War A Psychosis?
- The Biopsychosocial Model of Health & Illness
- Unhinging from Theory: Autism and Opinions
- Mind-Body: We Want Evidence, Don't We?
- Encephalon, Thirty-Third Edition
- Meditation for Troubled Minds: Can the Mind Heal the Mind?
- Acknowledging Vaccination Concerns
- Health Care and Politics II - The Democrats
- Usually It's Cheaper to Pay Than to Go To Court
- Giving Thanks All Year Long
- How Much Social Capital Do You Have?
- Should Doctors Engage in Racial Profiling?
- Going Green for Health Inequality
- Are Boys Really More Hard-Wired for Math than Girls?
- The Need for Post-Marketing Surveillance of Drugs
- Musical Medicine - Recovery After a MCA Stroke
- Are We Worshipping Celebrities or Heroes?
- Alcohol 101 - the Best Class on Campus
- School Bullies - Is the Amygdala to Blame?
- Reversing the Irreversible - Neuromotor Prostheses for Spinal Cord Injury
- How Much is a Pound of Prevention Worth?
- Electrical Brain Stimulation Improves Hand Motor Skills
- New Drug Approval - Lacosamide for Epilepsy
- Why Infidelity May Not Be Cheating Anymore
- Alzheimer’s Drug to Treat Binge Eating Disorder
- Brain Blogging, Forty-First Edition
- Diagnosing Child Abuse
- Hypnosis and Chronic Pain
- Hitler’s Guide to Propaganda - The Psychology of Coercion
- May the guidance of God (Allah) be upon you Mr Macher,
In your case against t...
- JJ: This is very true - here in the US the fear campaign has worked wonders in m...
- Hi Blogger. I can see from your posts that you're copying and pasting from a re...
- Thanks for visiting my site and giving this article link. I hope my readers and ...
- And lastly this: A sixteenth-century Swiss chemist named Paracelsus gave us th...
- the number of cases of measles and reported deaths from measles for the years 19...
- From the NY Time Aug 24 2008:
There has been an upsurge of measles cases in t...
- Typhoid - In 1911 immunisation of US army troops with typhoid vaccine became com...
- I'm still waiting for the name of the acceptable English translation of the Kor...
- And I will leave you with this one Shivers - From a study of more than 17,000 Ca...
- The internet is the last refuge of scoundrels, like Guy Macher, or whois2811, an...
- In light of the Muslim attacks in India, I find my brain telling me that religio...
- Please substitute sports for celebrity, and tell me if there is any difference....
- Hi again, you will just have to go through a search engine and look for T.I.R.L ...
- Hi Herd Rebel I don't know what took place but the e-mail link I gave for visiti...
- Hi Herd Rebel, it surely is a catch 22 situation, because here in Britain you ca...
- I agree with the need for more quality outdoor space such as nature trails which...
- Hey Evan, see below, I'm copying this entire message. I looked at some of these ...
- Really? I have some friends in Australia and UK (I just threw UK in there) and ...
- Researchers found that applying transcranial direct current stimulation, a weak ...
Advertisement
Sponsored Links
Neuroscience & Neurology
November 23, 2008 | 1 Comment | By RD, MD
Are Boys Really More Hard-Wired for Math than Girls?
More In Neuroscience & Neurology
- School Bullies - Is the Amygdala to Blame?
- Reversing the Irreversible - Neuromotor Prostheses for Spinal Cord Injury
- Electrical Brain Stimulation Improves Hand Motor Skills
- My Amygdala Made Me Vote for McCain/Obama
- A Unique Struggle Against Juvenile Huntington’s Disease
Neuroscience & Neurology
Opinion
October 15, 2008 | 1 Comment | By Sajid Surve, DO
The Gift of Life - Part 3
More In Opinion
- China’s Tainted Reputation
- HIPAA Doesn’t Exist For Doctors
- Some Funny Stories From the Trenches
- Are You Vegetarian? How Do You Get Enough Protein?
- The Gift of Life - Part 2
Opinion
Psychiatry & Psychology
November 20, 2008 | 1 Comment | By Jennifer Gibson, PharmD
Are We Worshipping Celebrities or Heroes?
More In Psychiatry & Psychology
- Why Infidelity May Not Be Cheating Anymore
- Hitler’s Guide to Propaganda - The Psychology of Coercion
- What is Intelligence?
- ADHD - A Very Incomplete Puzzle
- Sleep Deprivation, Behavior, and the Young



And everyone snooping in on his medical records yet nothing is done. Privacy laws only apply 1st to all celebrities then maybe a few token middle class folks, then finally Doctors.
I hate to tell Hipaa, but the common people and doctors want the same enforcement of the law that is provided for celebrities!
This is infuriating!