Drugs & Clinical Trials

Public Health Needs a Shot in the Arm

August 08, 2008 | By Jennifer Gibson, PharmD | Bookmark and Share | 3 Comments

Drugs and Clinical Trials Category Arguably, one of the greatest public health advances in the last century has been the advent of safe and effective vaccines for deadly diseases. Today, several vaccine-preventable diseases have all but disappeared from our lives, thanks to all 50 states mandating vaccination for school children and making routine vaccination a public health priority.

Children today receive dozens of doses of vaccines to prevent at least 16 illnesses throughout their infancy, childhood, and adolescence. For almost every child, these vaccines are safe and effective, leaving behind no more than a sore arm or leg for a few hours. However, the number of parents refusing vaccines for their children is rising.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Most states allow parents to refuse vaccination for religious reasons, but many health departments allow refusal for vaguely defined philosophical reasons. Most of theses reasons never have to be documented or addressed, and the parents are only required to check a box on a form to allow them to refuse vaccination for their child. Less than 2% of parents refuse vaccinations for their children, according to the CDC, but the incidence varies by location.

Parents choose not to vaccinate their children for many reasons. Many religious objections are legitimate, but often, other reasons are misguided and result from a lack of correct information or an extreme belief in personal freedom. The safety fears are worsening, though all vaccines on the market today have an acceptable safety profile, free of major adverse side effects for the majority of patients. The link between vaccines and autism is highly controversial and has not been proved, but many parents are still fearful. These issues continue to be addressed by the CDC and vaccine manufacturers to guarantee the safest possible vaccination program for all children.

While the rights of parents to choose what is best for their child are important and should be protected, vaccines do not benefit just the child receiving the shot. Herd immunity results from vaccinated individuals protecting unvaccinated individuals. The more vaccinated people that are protected from contagious diseases, the less likely it is that the disease will spread through the population to unvaccinated people. Herd immunity is especially important when considering people who cannot be vaccinated. For instance, very young children who have not yet been vaccinated can have very severe and life-threatening reactions to vaccine-preventable diseases. The elderly may not have received vaccinations that are now routine, and they often have multiple medical conditions that make infectious diseases more serious than in young, healthy people. Immunocompromised individuals, such as those with autoimmune disorders or those undergoing chemotherapy regimens, are not able to receive some vaccines, and the risk of a serious episode of an infectious disease increases with their worsening immune function.

Universal vaccination does not only contribute to disease prevention, but it contributes to the overall health and productivity of society. Quality of life is improved for both children and their caregivers when they avoid episodes of infectious disease. Parents do not miss workdays to care for a sick child. Societies experience improved healthcare delivery and infrastructure from routine vaccination programs.

Many parents, themselves, never experienced the diseases against which today’s vaccines are designed to protect, and some seem more afraid of the vaccine than the disease it prevents. Countless lives have been saved through the development of safe, effective vaccines. Education and communication are vital to parents’ interactions with pediatricians, in order to properly assess each vaccine’s appropriateness for each child and to protect future generations from deadly preventable diseases.

References

Bonanni, P. (2007). Vaccination and risk groups: how can we really protect the weakest? Human Vaccines, 3(5), 217-219.

Calandrillo, S.P. (2004). Vanishing vaccinations: why are so many Americans opting out of vaccinating their children? University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform, 37(2), 353-440.

Ulmer, J.B., Liu, M.A. (2002). SCIENCE AND SOCIETY – VACCINES: Ethical issues for vaccines and immunization. Nature Reviews Immunology, 2(4), 291-296. DOI: 10.1038/nri780

Tags: CDC, children, Disease, health, herd immunity, immunity, pediatrics, public health, risk, safety, Shot, Vaccination, vaccine

3 Comments

You can follow any responses to this article through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

missana
August 08, 2008 | Permalink

Your title should be the “Pharmaceuticals Industry is looking to new ways to profit from drugging and poisoning the population: I am the paid slave posing as an independent medical professional attempting to scare the populace to further there aims. “

redhead
August 08, 2008 | Permalink

Missana-

I applaud your way with words! Perfectly and truthfully said. Readers would benefit by googling-

1-Hannah Poling -autism - mitochondria
2-Dr Healy- vaccines- autism
3-David Kirby Evidence of Harm
4-Age of Autism
5-Offit ECBT AAP conflict of interest
6-thimerosal aluminum mitochondria
7-VAERS

Paul G. King
August 09, 2008 | Permalink

Jennifer Gibson, PharmD,

As a vaccine apologist , you speak of past accomplishments and increased vaccination refusals while ignoring the realities that the current vaccination programs that went beyond the highly contagious diseases of the past centuries to vaccinate for lifestyle (e.g. hepatitis B and HPV), usually benign (e.g. chicknepox [herpes varicella zoster]), and partially covered (e.g., the pneumococcal, meningococcal, and human influenza vaccines) diseases without considering the reality that, collectively, these have created growing epidemics of chronic diseases.

You speak of the good and ignore the harm - shame on you.

You speak of refusal and ignore the right to chose and give informed consent, which is being trampled by the disinformation provided about diseases, vaccine risks and theoretical vaccine benefits by the very healthcare establishment of which you are so obviously a member.

If you or any reader seeks a fairer look at these realities, I would suggest that you all read the reviews of similar articles that are posted in the “Documents” section of http://www.mercury-freedrugs.org, starting with “”A Review of: ‘As Diseases Make Comeback, Why Aren’t All Kids Vaccinated?’ Popular Mechanics Magazine on-line. Reynolds GH. (30 July 2008; 30 pages)”.

Hopefully, after reading these documents and checking the references cited, you will at least understand the hollowness of your world view and the iatrogenic harm that is being inflicted on many children.

As to the need for mandates for vaccines, Japan, a country with half our infant mortality, a significantly longer life expectancy, a much smaller and more supportable list of recommended vaccines that are freely provided, and a system where parents are free to vaccinate as and when they wish over an extended period of time, has no vaccination mandates and seems to be at least as free of communicable disease outbreaks as the US.

Finally, your position seems to be that we should vaccinate at any cost — monetary and colateral damge of chronic disease, maimed children and, in some cases, death.

This is a position that, as a previous commenter indicated, puts you clearly in the category of a lackey for today’s greed-driven “healthcare” establishment and those who supply the drugs and devices that fuel that greed.

Respectfully,

Dr. King
http://www.dr-king.com

PS: Lest any think otherwise, I am a proponent of safe and medically cost-effective vaccines. For example, if bitten by a rabid animal, I would not hesitate to get the rabies vaccine. However, I am opposed to vaccines that are NOT safe (and, based on the list of withdrawn vaccines, some are not safe), NOT truly effective (e.g., those vaccines that protect against only some of the circulating disease strains), and/or NOTin-use MEDICALLY cost-effective (e.g., the herpes varicella zoster vaccines, the rotavirus and HPV vaccines).