Drugs & Clinical Trials
New Anti-Cancer Drug for Aggressive Brain Tumors
Researchers are constantly trying to find new drugs or forms of therapy that can be used to treat cancer. Quite often when a possible treatment is discovered, being allowed to test a drug or other experimental cancer treatment at a clinical level is difficult. For example, after an anti-carcinogenic drug has been thoroughly tested at the experimental level it is necessary to test it in humans to analyze factors such as the drug’s anti-tumor activity, its ability to interact with a specific target, and to discover which patients are more likely to benefit from the drug. These types of early clinical trials are the key in the successful implementation of effective anti-tumor drugs and therapies.
One such study was done to treat a small group of glioblastoma patients with an experimental drug called rapamycin since they needed to undergo surgery because their glioblastoma tumors returned. Glioblastomas are aggressive brain tumors that are very invasive and exhibit rapid metastasis. Currently chemotherapy and surgery are not effective treatments for this type of cancer and in most cases, the tumors often return after treatment. This has caused researchers to look for alternative forms of treatment for glioblastomas that include anti-tumor drugs. An interesting discovery about glioblastoma cases is that approximately 40% of patients who develop glioblastomas have a gene called PTEN that becomes inactive. PTEN is a tumor suppressor gene that sensitizes cancer cells to drugs called mTOR inhibitors when it is inactivated. mTOR is a protein that plays a role in cell growth and proliferation. Rapamycin, also called Sirolimus, is an mTOR inhibitor and the anti-carcinogenic and well as immunosuppressive affects of these types of drugs are currently being evaluated.
For this study, 15 patients whose glioblastoma tumors returned were treated with different amounts of rapamycin one week before and after surgery. Each of these patients had tumors that did not express the PTEN gene and if the tumor appeared to be progressing after surgery the rapamycin treatment was discontinued. The purpose of this study was to determine if the drug could inhibit tumor growth and if so, at what concentration. In addition the researchers were hoping to reveal which patients were more likely to respond to rapamycin treatment.
The results of this study showed that the rate of tumor cell proliferation decreased in 7 of the 15 patients treated with rapamycin after surgery, and severe toxicity did not occur in most of the patients. The reduction of tumor cell proliferation was directly correlated to the inhibition of the mTOR protein. Scans that were obtained from 2 patients even showed signs that the tumor mass was decreasing. Unfortunately, when tumor cells that reacted to rapamycin in patients were tested in a laboratory setting, the cells no longer responded to rapamycin treatment. This appeared to be due to the drug’s inability to penetrate the tumor ex vivo. In addition, the treatment of rapamycin led to the activation of a protein called Akt in some patients, which decreased the time period between surgery and a reoccurrence of their tumor.
These results showed that although rapamycin caused a reduction of tumor cell proliferation in some glioblastoma patients, in others it activated a second protein that accelerated the progression of the disease. This strengthens the point that these types of studies are essential. The side effects of this drug in some patients is life threatening so it is important to analyze the clinical effects from a small group of selected patients before the drug is distributed on a large scale level or in clinics nationwide.
Reference
Cloughesy, T.F., Yoshimoto, K., Nghiemphu, P., Brown, K., Dang, J., Zhu, S., Hsueh, T., Chen, Y., Wang, W., Youngkin, D., Liau, L., Martin, N., Becker, D., Bergsneider, M., Lai, A., Green, R., Oglesby, T., Koleto, M., Trent, J., Horvath, S., Mischel, P.S., Mellinghoff, I.K., Sawyers, C.L. (2008). Antitumor Activity of Rapamycin in a Phase I Trial for Patients with Recurrent PTEN-Deficient Glioblastoma. PLoS Medicine, 5(1), e8. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0050008
Related Articles
Friday, July 4, 2008
- The Anti-Psychiatry Movement
- Should Doctors Have Guns?
- Vaccines - A Two-Edged Sword
- Extremist Muslim Doctors Do More Than Heal
- Woman Comparable to Men in Domestic Violence: Stereotypes and their Consequences
- The Bipolar Trend
- The Biopsychosocial Model of Health & Illness
- Unhinging from Theory: Autism and Opinions
- The Implications of Implanted Chips
- Encephalon, Thirty-Third Edition
- Meditation for Troubled Minds: Can the Mind Heal the Mind?
- Mind-Body: We Want Evidence, Don't We?
- Anti-Smoking Campaign Doesn't Mess Around
- Usually It's Cheaper to Pay Than to Go To Court
- Integrating Schizophrenia Management
- Is War A Psychosis?
- Encephalon, Forthy-Third Edition
- God And Religion: Is It All In Our Heads?
- Acknowledging Vaccination Concerns
- Staying the Course Prescribed for Major Depressive and Bipolar Disorders: A Family's Journey Thus Far
- Ethical Obligations of Health Care Workers During a Pandemic
- Treating Psychiatric Disorders - Something Smells Fishy
- Going Beyond Informed Consent
- Anti-Smoking Campaign Doesn’t Mess Around
- Vaccines - A Two-Edged Sword
- Prescriptive Authority - Are Pharmacists “Write”?
- Should Patients with Schizophrenia Receive Free Medication?
- Should Doctors Unionize?
- Blood Glucose and the Brain: Sugar and Short-Term Memory
- Should Doctors be Paid by Drug Companies for Research?
- How Do We Feed Our Children?
- Ethics 101 - Patients Who Hide The Truth
- Food Additives, Hyperactivity, and Common Sense
- Concierge Medicine - The Future or the Past?
- Brain Blogging, Thirty-Fifth Edition
- Are Placebos A Betrayal?
- New Technology for Intracranial Aneurysms
- Stem Cell Research - Man vs. God
- Using Infrared Light to Diagnosis Alzheimer’s
- Mozart, MD - Music for the Mind and Body
- Also, regarding the "Presidential Elect" (ughhh....) don't blame me - I was a RP...
- We have a lot in common. I pay "little attention" to GMF's (bad I know, but the...
- The WHO's numbers are not accurate.
There are approximately 6.5 Billion peopl...
- Thanks, Kobie.
I appreciate the heads-up regarding the upcoming event. I will d...
- Thanks for the article. Dept of Health and human services is having a webcast on...
- What benefits would a patient with schizophrenia have if they were to have a MRI...
- How ironic to address these issues on the anniversary of our "independence", as ...
- Hi,
I followed a conscious feeding regime with my eldest boy many years ago. ...
- LOL - I know too well of the revolving door of FDA/NIH and Pharma... if you real...
- Dr. Sherry Tenpenny's theory is that if mainstream medicine dares to question '...
- if you are really interested in this topic, volunteer to be on your local human ...
- Tia: I have a vaccine injured cousin and nephew (autism). Unfortunately, my fami...
- And thank you, Herd Rebel, for making the world safer for YOUR children. I spend...
- thank you...
- Thanks for your contributions Tia, you opened the forum. HCN, I'm not sure what ...
- In my experience, doctors are not capable of discussing side effects of a treatm...
- Looks like HCN might just be a hack-blogger for some vested vaccine interest.......
- To understand the "quality" of "science" behind Gardasil - read Dr. Harper's rev...
- I am not sure exactly where this thread is going.... but to answer an earlier co...
- Statistical precision notwithstanding, I think the interesting point is that a s...
Advertisement
Sponsored Links
Neuroscience & Neurology
June 26, 2008 | 4 Comments | By Jennifer Gibson, PharmD
Blood Glucose and the Brain: Sugar and Short-Term Memory
More In Neuroscience & Neurology
- New Technology for Intracranial Aneurysms
- Using Infrared Light to Diagnosis Alzheimer’s
- God And Religion: Is It All In Our Heads?
- Brain Prosthesis: Coming to a Hospital Near You?
- The Great Embryonic Stem Cell Debate
Neuroscience & Neurology
Opinion
June 30, 2008 | 34 Comments | By Nirupama Shankar, PT, MHS
Vaccines - A Two-Edged Sword
More In Opinion
- How Do We Feed Our Children?
- Stem Cell Research - Man vs. God
- Only the Rich Get Old?
- Extremist Muslim Doctors Do More Than Heal
- Unhinging from Theory: Autism and Opinions
Opinion
Psychiatry & Psychology
July 03, 2008 | 0 Comments | By Jennifer Gibson, PharmD
Treating Psychiatric Disorders - Something Smells Fishy
More In Psychiatry & Psychology
- Should Patients with Schizophrenia Receive Free Medication?
- Does Having ADHD Mean Doing Poorly in School?
- Self-Medicating with Over-The-Counter Medicines for Mental Illness
- Interactive Effects of Genetics on Depression
- Postpartum Depression: Not Just For Moms















Leave a Reply