Opinion
Usually It’s Cheaper to Pay Than to Go To Court
I’ve written before about medical malpractice and the rising costs for physicians of all specialties. One of the things we as physicians really fear is malpractice lawsuits by patients. We are taught in medical school and in training that the number one way to prevent a lawsuit is to talk to the patient and address their concerns. If a mistake is made, it is best to come forward in advance and let the patient know that a mistake was made. Perhaps the mistake was made by the physician, perhaps by the hospital, perhaps by another physician that the patient previously saw. Usually an apology will prevent a lawsuit.
Physicians all take an oath to do no harm and to always do what is best for the patient. Unfortunately, patients do not take an oath to protect their physicians from harm. Thus there are times when a physician does the right thing but an untoward outcome still results. Some illnesses and diseases and procedures are not “cure-alls” and the patient must know this in advance.
When things to escalate and a patient files a malpractice lawsuit, it is generally easier and cheaper for the physician to settle the claim out of court. The cost of settlement usually is far less than the cost of litigation for lawyers and for time spent. Additionally, the mental stress of an ongoing lawsuit can be disruptive both to professional and personal life for the physician.
One effect of settling claims outside of court is that they go on your record. When a patient looks up your public record, he or she can see that you settled a claim. Additionally, when you go to renew your malpractice insurance, your premiums will increase. Sometimes, it will prohibit you from renewal because you are considered “high-risk”.
Studies have shown that patients who ultimately file a lawsuit are looking for something from the physician. Usually it is time and attention and not money. Unfortunately, money typically is the solution when it gets to that point. Unfortunately, given that the system is set up so that physicians settle out of court, the physician can be penalized by frivolous claims.
Some people think that such is the risk we take to serve others as physicians. Others suggest that there needs to be reform. I’m not exactly sure what the answer is, but one side effect of this messed up system is that physicians become very picky about who they accept as patients. If someone appears to be litigious or very high maintenance then a physician may defer care to another physician in order to reduce risk. In an elective situation, this is probably not that big of a deal. In an emergent situation, it can be life threatening.
Related Articles
12 Comments/Trackbacks
From a patient’s point of view, it’s ambiguous. Having run in to my share of none-too-competent doctors (including the one who said my mother was a crock — his term! — while she was on her deathbed), I know the fact that a person is bright enough to get through the rigors of medical school doesn’t necessarily make her or him competent to practice the art & science of medicine. But on the other hand, absent obscene insensitivity and brain-boggling stupidity, doctors, being human, make honest mistakes for which neither they nor we (as none-too-competent patients) can be blamed.
Economics be damned, I guess if I were a doctor I would not fold my tent and creep away unless I had committed an error that was truly the result of incompetence.
One wishes the system were better. But given what we have to work with, we all need to stand up for what we think we have done right. Or at least NOT done egregiously, pig-headedly, stupidly wrong.
Deoxy
Let’s say, there is some chance of losing $100k in court. The offer is to settle for $10K. Pretty irresistible, no?
The thing you are forgetting is that it will cost $10K (or more) just to defend against the suit, and that’s if you WIN.
AND there’s often a penalty for being sued too much, even if you win them all (in terms of med-mal insurance).
The physician’s position is thus lose-lose.
D: The lawyer has to spend money to bring a claim. So, a track record of success encourages more of the same.
I propose not just the standard defense. I suggest hiring a private lawyer to put the fire under the chair of the underpaid, under-skilled insurance defense lawyer. Every possible preliminary motion should be filed. If a motion fails, the defense attorney should know, she will be fired. That is the Walmart system. That way, the defense attorney does not get rewarded with trial fees for failing pre-trial motions.
I also would absolutely demand sanctions from the judge against the plaintiff attorney and plaintiff expert for every infraction. One has to use every word said or written in gotcha. If the defense attorney refuses to write these, because of needing the fees of a trial, I would write the complaints to the judge personally. Ordinary language is fine. For example, one could say, the claim in the resume of the expert is false. Then submit the highlighted resume, and the evidence that the claim is false. The judge will find that helpful. Do not make the judge do work. He is not allowed to do your work of advocacy, nor to do any other investigation. If he did, he could be impeached. Lay out the evidence in one communication.
One should also file ethics charges with the respective licensing boards, against both. These valid complaints to insure the other side lives with uncertainty as they have insured the innocent defendant has to. I oppose frivolous complaints against the plaintiff side.
Doctors should settle cases if they are sure they made a harmful mistake, and not to avoid the conflict of litigation. That is a legitimate purpose of malpractice insurance. I oppose a vigorous defense to maintain pride.
The extra effort shuts off future lawyer cottage industries. I am disappointed when pharmaceutical companies take the short sighted cowardly route. I may try to alter the balance of fear by suing them as a shareholder, to whom they owe fiduciary duties to defend these bogus lawsuits.
Trackbacks
- Feb 23, 2008 | Overlawyered
- Feb 25, 2008 | Personal Injury Resources
- Feb 28, 2008 | I’m A Pundit Too | Carnival of Political Punditry - February 24, 2008
- Mar 03, 2008 | Monday Morning Carnival Linkfest « Are You Going To Be This Way The Rest of The Time I Know You?
- Mar 06, 2008 | Everything Finance
- May 08, 2008 | Mininno Law Office Blog » Do People File Frivolous Medical Malpractice Suits To Get "Time and Attention" From Their Doctor?
- May 18, 2008 | February 23 roundup
- Jun 19, 2008 | March 4 roundup
Leave a Reply
Friday, July 3, 2009
- Marijuana Withdrawal Syndrome
- Autism - No Need For A Cure?
- Are Humans Hard-Wired to Torture?
- Free Will and the Philosophy of Science
- Therapy and Medication - Where's the Breaking News?
- Emotions and the Brain
- Clearing the Haze - Is Marijuana Addictive?
- How Many Babies Is Too Many?
- Is Sugar the New Cocaine?
- What is Free Will?
- Reflections on Plasticity
- Recent Drug Warnings About Suicide
- Lithium as a Neuroprotectant?
- Logistical Barriers to Stem Cell Research
- Transparency in the Pharmaceutical Industry
- Topical Morphine - An Experimental Approach to Chronic Pain
- Be a Doctor! The Hours are Great!
- Time for a Change - Gender Reassignment
- Is Obesity Contagious?
- The Hidden Dangers of Soy
- Why Do Schizophrenics Smoke Cigarettes?
- Prevention of Adolescent Depression
- Drugs and Pharmacology, Sixteenth Edition
- Get By With a Little Help From Your Friends
- Communication is Key to Appropriate Antibiotic Use
- Time for a Change – Gender Reassignment
- Common Treatment Ineffective for Autism
- Marijuana Withdrawal Syndrome
- NSAIDs – Prevention or Just Delay of Dementia?
- What is Proprioception?
- Who Should Decide the Survivability of Newborns?
- Reflections on Plasticity
- Death and Dying in Tough Economic Times
- Medicate or Educate? – Just Pop a Polypill
- Dressing for Success? – the White Coat Dilemma
- What is Free Will?
- Clearing the Haze – Is Marijuana Addictive?
- Migraine Uncovered – Interview with Dr. Cady, Headache Expert
- Brain Blogging, Forty-Fifth Edition
- Barriers to Emergency Contraception
- Low blood sugar and high caffeine intake are also characteristic of many active ...
- As, I had a short 4-day trip to the mental hospital I can attest, almost all of ...
- How dare you tell me I experience no withdrawals? Who are you and what makes yo...
- Neither profession is more important than the other. I say this as a practicing ...
- I would imagine, to you....
- "You are also profiteering off of those who are “addicted,” and there’s usually ...
- I have been THC free for many years (after many years of daily use) and never ex...
- Please take a look at this article and see that we paranoid pro-pot-people have ...
- Bryan,
Thanks for sharing your thoughts. If you are equating food or exercise ...
- Samantha, you're in a ridiculous state of denial about marijuana addiction. I wa...
- From my own experience it is very important to look into hormone disturbances. I...
- Hello, I am not at all opposed to the idea that marijuana can be addictive for s...
- I agree with Joseph's comment and many of the points that Samantha makes as well...
- Plasticity just makes me happy. You should read or hear what the program all in ...
- Great post, I have been studying depression also. But I took another approach.
...
- Cognative behavioral therapy for some adolescents in a productive enviornment wi...
- Not BS!!!!! I'm 24 years old and I never smoked Marijuana more than twice a year...
- The author is certainly taking a beating from those who seem a little defensive ...
- I left the personal anecdotes for last in a 3-part series, intending them to ser...
- There are some thoughtful and some not-so-thoughtful comments here. The article ...
Brain Blogger's Historical Brain Illustrations









Sponsored Links
Home Care, Legitimate Online Jobs, Alcohol Rehab, Emergency Lighting, Online Criminal Justice Degrees, Tattoo, Health Insurance, Free Resume Analysis , Buy Home , Electronic Accessory , About Credit Reports , About Card Printing , About Trade Show Displays , Rheumatoid Arthritis Injection , Dandruff Shampoo , Heart Health , About Garments , Health America OH , Whitening Toothpaste , Hydroxycut, Astrology compatibility.
Neuroscience & Neurology
June 09, 2009 | 2 Comments | By Sajid Surve, DO
What is Proprioception?
More In Neuroscience & Neurology
- Reflections on Plasticity
- Migraine Uncovered – Interview with Dr. Cady, Headache Expert
- The Many Facets of Addiction
- Objective Testing for Alzheimer’s Disease
- Free Will and the Philosophy of Science
Neuroscience & Neurology
Opinion
June 21, 2009 | 6 Comments | By T. A. McNamee, MD
Time for a Change – Gender Reassignment
More In Opinion
- What is Free Will?
- Medical Controversy – When Does Life Begin?
- Emotions and the Brain
- Relying on a Peripheral Brain
- How Many Babies Is Too Many?
Opinion
Psychiatry & Psychology
July 03, 2009 | 2 Comments | By Dirk Hanson, MA
Why Do Schizophrenics Smoke Cigarettes?
More In Psychiatry & Psychology
- Prevention of Adolescent Depression
- Common Treatment Ineffective for Autism
- Are Humans Hard-Wired to Torture?
- Cognitive Theories and Brain Damage
- Poor Outcomes for Older Adults with Depression


Brain: I disagree with cheaper to settle. Let’s say, there is some chance of losing $100k in court. The offer is to settle for $10K. Pretty irresistible, no? Insurance saves on trial cost, on a risk of an adverse verdict. The doctor goes back to work, forgets the case. He spares self 1000 hours of worry. The $10K is from other people’s money. He can even admit to no malfeasance and demand that the settlement not be reported to the National Practitioner Data Bank.
How can anyone lose by settling?
The lawyers learn from case experience. Thus, across the country, dozens or hundreds of cases will get filed to make an easy $10K.
One should settle only if one feels one has made a mistake that hurt a patient.