As Michael Moore ventures deeper and deeper into politics, his film-making abilities are getting better and better. I enjoyed Sicko for its slick cinematography and the powerful use of disturbing images and stories. Since its release in June 29, 2007, it is clear that it will be overwhelmingly successful at the box-office, and is sure to do well across the world markets for anti-Americana. And for once, I am convinced anti-Moore critics are temporarily on the back seat.

However as far as Sicko’s message is concerned, looking beyond the scathing sarcasm and criticism of the health insurance industry its time for everyone to ask themselves a few basic questions.

Does the concept of socialized medicine have any relevance in the 21st century? Isn’t it as outdated as McCarthyism or Bolshevism? Simply stated, if you want to bring down the cost of healthcare, does it make sense to pay to exorbitant sums to the middleman, and then reward him for denying it to as many as possible? Well that is at the heart of the matter — universal healthcare in America cannot possibly co-exist with the insurance industry. The whole concept of free healthcare for everyone is so alien in this world of managed healthcare, that the mere mention of the word “reform” or “subsidized drugs” would bring healthcare stocks crashing down on Wall Street.

Despite the fact that nearly all other “capitalist” economies have deliberately kept healthcare out of the profit-sector, the question is a purely political one. The main point that Sicko raises is not about the 50 million Americans who do not have health insurance (as it is no different from homelessness or drug addiction to the lawmakers), but how having a middleman (the insurance industry) stands in the way of delivering it in a humanitarian spirit that medicine has been traditionally required under oath… And Sicko cleverly picks out those few aberrant instances where this has resulted in a complete breakdown in humaneness. Like the scene where the elderly woman was dumped from the hospital into the street by a taxi (is the driver any less inhuman for accepting such a passenger?) or being turned down for surgery for failing to disclose a past yeast infection.

Healthcare costs will continue spiraling, as Humana’s success on Wall Street is an affirmation that capitalism works in the US. But unless people see the glaring irony that the success of the healthcare industry (a.k.a. richer middlemen) and healthy Americans are antithetical, the debate on Universal Healthcare will continue.

But is there really any serious ground for debate on an issue that is obviously nonsensical to debate about? Its time to look beyond the rhetoric, deep within ourselves.

Related Articles

• The Huckabee Diet: A Flawed Model of Health Advocacy
• WHO Calls for Community Health Services to Address Mental Health Issues
• Make Money for Charity Debating Fundamentalists, Part II: The Ten Ethical Debating Rules
• Genetic Discrimination: A Real Threat?
• Make Money for Charity Debating Fundamentalists, Part I: The Games