Law & Politics
The Mental Health Parity Bill of 2007
Last month, the U.S. Senate approved what will be known as the Mental Health Parity Bill. This piece of legislation will require group health plans with mental health benefits to offer them at the same level as physical health benefits. The measure does not affect individual insurance plans but only group. This bill certainly destigmatizes mental illness by not allowing mental health to be treated differently by health insurers. Some highlights include having the same deductibles, copayments, number of visits, days of coverage, and annual or lifetime limits as physical illness. It also includes substance abuse treatment.
It has been a long time coming for mental health to gain equal footing for physical health. If you have ever suffered mental disease or know somebody who has, you know that mental disorders are not simple to treat and can require prolonged periods of expensive therapy. Psychiatrists and other mental health providers have been financially squeezed because their reimbursements do not account for the extent of treatment. Many providers have been forced to limit their patient visits to 15 minutes in order to be able to make their practices financially solvent.
As a consumer of health care, I think it is great to know that I can access mental health care should I ever need it. Hopefully, the final version of the Bill that hits Congress and President Bush’s desk will not be too different from its current version.
Related Articles
6 Comments
parity fanatic for YEARS
Good news that it will be treated the same, and payment won’t be different. That will help so many families who struggle to make ends meet, and decide if they can afford treatment or not.
Nice observation, thanks.
truthman
I am an ex user of paxil ( seroxat in the UK) and i have good reason to believe that Paxil causes long term neurological damage ..
I do hope this new Bill will recognise the dangers of paxil and other spych drugs and the damage they can cause to people…
This drug is very dangerous..
I have set up a blog documenting the Paxil(Seroxat) scandal…
Please check out my blog..
http://truthman30.wordpress.com/
any comments or debate about Paxil would be appreciated , thanks.
Trackbacks
- Apr 16, 2007 | MENTAL HEALTH SOURCE PAGE » Blog Archive » Emotional Invalidation, Brands or Generics, Worrying, and More
- Apr 30, 2007 | carnival of eating disorders #5 » change therapy - isabella mori
Leave a Reply
Friday, July 4, 2008
- The Anti-Psychiatry Movement
- Should Doctors Have Guns?
- Vaccines - A Two-Edged Sword
- Extremist Muslim Doctors Do More Than Heal
- Woman Comparable to Men in Domestic Violence: Stereotypes and their Consequences
- The Bipolar Trend
- The Biopsychosocial Model of Health & Illness
- Unhinging from Theory: Autism and Opinions
- The Implications of Implanted Chips
- Encephalon, Thirty-Third Edition
- Meditation for Troubled Minds: Can the Mind Heal the Mind?
- Mind-Body: We Want Evidence, Don't We?
- Anti-Smoking Campaign Doesn't Mess Around
- Usually It's Cheaper to Pay Than to Go To Court
- Integrating Schizophrenia Management
- Is War A Psychosis?
- Encephalon, Forthy-Third Edition
- God And Religion: Is It All In Our Heads?
- Acknowledging Vaccination Concerns
- Staying the Course Prescribed for Major Depressive and Bipolar Disorders: A Family's Journey Thus Far
- Ethical Obligations of Health Care Workers During a Pandemic
- Treating Psychiatric Disorders - Something Smells Fishy
- Going Beyond Informed Consent
- Anti-Smoking Campaign Doesn’t Mess Around
- Vaccines - A Two-Edged Sword
- Prescriptive Authority - Are Pharmacists “Write”?
- Should Patients with Schizophrenia Receive Free Medication?
- Should Doctors Unionize?
- Blood Glucose and the Brain: Sugar and Short-Term Memory
- Should Doctors be Paid by Drug Companies for Research?
- How Do We Feed Our Children?
- Ethics 101 - Patients Who Hide The Truth
- Food Additives, Hyperactivity, and Common Sense
- Concierge Medicine - The Future or the Past?
- Brain Blogging, Thirty-Fifth Edition
- Are Placebos A Betrayal?
- New Technology for Intracranial Aneurysms
- Stem Cell Research - Man vs. God
- Using Infrared Light to Diagnosis Alzheimer’s
- Mozart, MD - Music for the Mind and Body
- Also, regarding the "Presidential Elect" (ughhh....) don't blame me - I was a RP...
- We have a lot in common. I pay "little attention" to GMF's (bad I know, but the...
- The WHO's numbers are not accurate.
There are approximately 6.5 Billion peopl...
- Thanks, Kobie.
I appreciate the heads-up regarding the upcoming event. I will d...
- Thanks for the article. Dept of Health and human services is having a webcast on...
- What benefits would a patient with schizophrenia have if they were to have a MRI...
- How ironic to address these issues on the anniversary of our "independence", as ...
- Hi,
I followed a conscious feeding regime with my eldest boy many years ago. ...
- LOL - I know too well of the revolving door of FDA/NIH and Pharma... if you real...
- Dr. Sherry Tenpenny's theory is that if mainstream medicine dares to question '...
- if you are really interested in this topic, volunteer to be on your local human ...
- Tia: I have a vaccine injured cousin and nephew (autism). Unfortunately, my fami...
- And thank you, Herd Rebel, for making the world safer for YOUR children. I spend...
- thank you...
- Thanks for your contributions Tia, you opened the forum. HCN, I'm not sure what ...
- In my experience, doctors are not capable of discussing side effects of a treatm...
- Looks like HCN might just be a hack-blogger for some vested vaccine interest.......
- To understand the "quality" of "science" behind Gardasil - read Dr. Harper's rev...
- I am not sure exactly where this thread is going.... but to answer an earlier co...
- Statistical precision notwithstanding, I think the interesting point is that a s...
Advertisement
Sponsored Links
Neuroscience & Neurology
June 26, 2008 | 4 Comments | By Jennifer Gibson, PharmD
Blood Glucose and the Brain: Sugar and Short-Term Memory
More In Neuroscience & Neurology
- New Technology for Intracranial Aneurysms
- Using Infrared Light to Diagnosis Alzheimer’s
- God And Religion: Is It All In Our Heads?
- Brain Prosthesis: Coming to a Hospital Near You?
- The Great Embryonic Stem Cell Debate
Neuroscience & Neurology
Opinion
June 30, 2008 | 34 Comments | By Nirupama Shankar, PT, MHS
Vaccines - A Two-Edged Sword
More In Opinion
- How Do We Feed Our Children?
- Stem Cell Research - Man vs. God
- Only the Rich Get Old?
- Extremist Muslim Doctors Do More Than Heal
- Unhinging from Theory: Autism and Opinions
Opinion
Psychiatry & Psychology
July 03, 2008 | 0 Comments | By Jennifer Gibson, PharmD
Treating Psychiatric Disorders - Something Smells Fishy
More In Psychiatry & Psychology
- Should Patients with Schizophrenia Receive Free Medication?
- Does Having ADHD Mean Doing Poorly in School?
- Self-Medicating with Over-The-Counter Medicines for Mental Illness
- Interactive Effects of Genetics on Depression
- Postpartum Depression: Not Just For Moms















The Senate Bill (S558) is not as broad as the House version (HR1367)
The House version follows the Federal Employees Health plan which covers ALL mental illness diagnoses. Over 8.5 million Federal employees & their dependents have had this BROAD definition coverage since 2001 by executive order of Democratic President- Clinton.
The Senate version would allow the group plan to LIMIT the mental illness diagnoses covered; this makes the parity more limited!
Both bills would require Self-insured plans to comply with this requirement.
These bills are not mandates. If a plan would decide to not cover mental illness at all, it could.
The definition our representatives have SHOULD be what we private sector turkeys deserve.