Brain Blogger Home
  • Home
  • About
    • Editor's Note
    • Contributors
  • Advertise
  • Archives
    • By Author
    • By Topic
    • By Year
    • By Month
  • Contact
  • Contribute
  • Topics
    • Popular
    • Series
    • Video
    • Carnivals
  • Sitemap
  • Subscribe
  • Neuroscience & Neurology
  • Psychology & Psychiatry
  • Health & Healthcare
  • More >>
    • BioPsychoSocial Health
    • Complementary & Alternative Medicine
    • Drugs & Clinical Trials
    • History of Medicine
    • Law & Politics
    • Living with a Brain Disorder
    • Opinion
    • Site News
    • Stigmatization
Brain Blogger RSS Feed

Brain Blogger Feed - 3500+ Readers

Follow BB:

Brain Blogger on FaceBook Brain Blogger on twitter Brain Blogger on Flickr Brain Blogger on YouTube
Law & Politics
April 4, 2007

The Mental Health Parity Bill of 2007

By JC, MD | 7 Comments | Share | Print | Email | Tweet | Like | 1+

Law_Politics.jpgLast month, the U.S. Senate approved what will be known as the Mental Health Parity Bill. This piece of legislation will require group health plans with mental health benefits to offer them at the same level as physical health benefits. The measure does not affect individual insurance plans but only group. This bill certainly destigmatizes mental illness by not allowing mental health to be treated differently by health insurers. Some highlights include having the same deductibles, copayments, number of visits, days of coverage, and annual or lifetime limits as physical illness. It also includes substance abuse treatment.

It has been a long time coming for mental health to gain equal footing for physical health. If you have ever suffered mental disease or know somebody who has, you know that mental disorders are not simple to treat and can require prolonged periods of expensive therapy. Psychiatrists and other mental health providers have been financially squeezed because their reimbursements do not account for the extent of treatment. Many providers have been forced to limit their patient visits to 15 minutes in order to be able to make their practices financially solvent.

As a consumer of health care, I think it is great to know that I can access mental health care should I ever need it. Hopefully, the final version of the Bill that hits Congress and President Bush’s desk will not be too different from its current version.

JC, MD

Dr. JC is a medical doctor who has a passion for health promotion and education.

Related Articles

  • When Did the Brain Become Disconnected From the Body?
  • Mental Health Spending – A Low Priority for Government
  • Culturally Competent Care – Are Health Care Providers Doing Enough?
  • Antidepressants – Who’s Prescribing What
  • Pain May Mask Depression Around the World
  • The Ugly Ramifications of Health Insurance Costs
  • Self-Medicating with Over-The-Counter Medicines for Mental Illness

7 Responses

  1. parity fanatic for YEARS says:
    April 5, 2007 at 7:05 am

    The Senate Bill (S558) is not as broad as the House version (HR1367)
    The House version follows the Federal Employees Health plan which covers ALL mental illness diagnoses. Over 8.5 million Federal employees & their dependents have had this BROAD definition coverage since 2001 by executive order of Democratic President- Clinton.
    The Senate version would allow the group plan to LIMIT the mental illness diagnoses covered; this makes the parity more limited!
    Both bills would require Self-insured plans to comply with this requirement.
    These bills are not mandates. If a plan would decide to not cover mental illness at all, it could.
    The definition our representatives have SHOULD be what we private sector turkeys deserve.

    Reply
  2. Deb says:
    April 17, 2007 at 8:15 am

    Good news that it will be treated the same, and payment won’t be different. That will help so many families who struggle to make ends meet, and decide if they can afford treatment or not.

    Reply
  3. John says:
    May 30, 2007 at 9:48 pm

    Nice observation, thanks.

    Reply
  4. truthman says:
    June 20, 2007 at 6:23 pm

    I am an ex user of paxil ( seroxat in the UK) and i have good reason to believe that Paxil causes long term neurological damage ..

    I do hope this new Bill will recognise the dangers of paxil and other spych drugs and the damage they can cause to people…

    This drug is very dangerous..

    I have set up a blog documenting the Paxil(Seroxat) scandal…

    Please check out my blog..

    http://truthman30.wordpress.com/

    any comments or debate about Paxil would be appreciated , thanks.

    Reply
  5. Woodworking Projects says:
    May 11, 2011 at 5:46 am

    I am quite surprised that I haven’t heard updates regarding this bill in today’s administration. Everyone’s talking about Health Bill this and that, but I have yet to hear about this one…

    Reply
  1. MENTAL HEALTH SOURCE PAGE » Blog Archive » Emotional Invalidation, Brands or Generics, Worrying, and More says:
    April 16, 2007 at 8:43 pm

    [...] JC noted The Mental Health Parity Bill of 2007. One of the major implications of this bill is to treat mental illness at the same level as a [...]

    Reply
  2. carnival of eating disorders #5 » change therapy - isabella mori says:
    April 30, 2007 at 10:19 pm

    [...] lakhan presents the mental health parity bill of 2007 posted at GNIF brain [...]

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Subscribe without commenting


Popular Posts

  • The Love Drug
  • Women After Sex
  • Fatty Acids and Suicide Risk
  • Mind Games - Science's Attempts at Thought Control
  • Risks of Personalized Medicine
  • Mental Health Disorders Prevalent Among Youth Worldwide
  • Is Giftedness Nothing More than Good Genes?
  • Behind the Masks - The Mysteries of Dissociative Identity Disorder
  • The NeuroSocial Network
  • Inside Your Brain on Holiday

Future Posts

  • The Brain’s Buying Power
  • Aging Intelligently

Latest Posts

  • A Nicotine Patch a Day Keeps the Cognitive Impairment Away
  • The Many Emerging Roles of Astrocytes
  • Diabetes Impairs Cognition
  • Media Violence Leads to Real Violence
  • Intelligence – Are You Holding Back Your Brain?
  • Childhood Aggression Predicts Health Care Use Later in Life
  • The Brain’s Border Patrol – Blood Brain Barrier
  • Risks of Personalized Medicine
  • BED-head and Obesity – Food for Thought
  • Salvia Divinorum – DEA Control over Magic in the Mint

Comments

  • Emily Haines, MSc, PhD student: Thanks for your comments, Matt
  • Emily Haines, MSc, PhD student: Thanks for your comments and s
  • Alex: While we have our eyes glued t
  • Richard Kensinger, MSW: Carla,You are absolutely c
  • Soraya L. Valles: I'm interested in astrocytes.
  • Raymond Tallis: Dear Kitty, I have come to you
  • Steven: After smoking for 17 years dai
  • Matt: I'm just interested in hearing
  • Carla Easley: If everyone adopted the "Growt
  • Isabel (retired RN): I second that query for resear
  • David: How about some citations to pe
  • MrsK: @Dawn - I agree with your stat
Sponsored Links

chinese wholesale, memory improvement, web design brisbane, Autism News Blog, Pharmaceutical Training, Neurotherapist, HGH, Retractable Banner Stands , Buy Altace , AtomicPR , residential treatment centers , Lab Tests Locations

Copyright © 2005-2012 Brain Blogger sponsored by Global Neuroscience Initiative Foundation (GNIF). All Rights Reserved.
Disclaimer | Privacy Policy | Feed | Log in | ISSN 1931-6224 | 0.901s
9rules Network Member