Brain Blogger Home
  • Home
  • About
    • Editor's Note
    • Contributors
  • Advertise
  • Archives
    • By Author
    • By Topic
    • By Year
    • By Month
  • Contact
  • Contribute
  • Topics
    • Popular
    • Series
    • Video
    • Carnivals
  • Sitemap
  • Subscribe
  • Neuroscience & Neurology
  • Psychology & Psychiatry
  • Health & Healthcare
  • More >>
    • BioPsychoSocial Health
    • Complementary & Alternative Medicine
    • Drugs & Clinical Trials
    • History of Medicine
    • Law & Politics
    • Living with a Brain Disorder
    • Opinion
    • Site News
    • Stigmatization
Brain Blogger RSS Feed

Brain Blogger Feed - 3500+ Readers

Follow BB:

Brain Blogger on FaceBook Brain Blogger on twitter Brain Blogger on Flickr Brain Blogger on YouTube
BioPsychoSocial Health
March 19, 2006

Theories on Health Behaviors

By Shaheen E Lakhan, MD, PhD, MEd, MS | 1 Comment | Share | Print | Email | Tweet | Like | 1+

BioPsychoSocial_Health.jpgIn behavioral medicine, professionals base their interventions on a few models that attempt to explain people’s health-related behavior: the health belief model, reasoned and planned behavior theory, learning theories/classical conditioning, and social cognitive theory. These models are termed continuum theories, for they aim to recognize variables that influence people’s behavior, and using the sum of variables, how likely the person will engage in a particular behavior (Weinstein, Rothman, & Sutton, 1998). They are often criticized on their narrow focus on outcome behavior of interest (e.g. smoking cession) and its non-inclusion of race, gender, and socioeconomic status — all features known to have a somewhat strong influence on health behavior. Nonetheless, the model dynamics are useful to describe particular types of behavior.

Health Belief Model

As the one of the earliest frameworks for understanding human behavior, the health belief model declares that individuals will take health related actions based on six types of factors and associated beliefs:

Perceived Susceptibility: the condition may hurt the individual on any aspect of the biopsychosocial model.

Perceived Severity: the condition is severe enough to have a negative consequence.

Perceived Benefits: the advised actions may stop, lower, or lessen the affect, risk, and consequences of the condition, respectively.

Perceived Barriers/Costs: the corrective/preventive benefits outweigh the psychological and physical harms of abiding to the advised behavior.

Cues to Action: there is an internal or external cue, or both, that trigger the individual to finally act.

This model is better for predicting simple, one-time or limited behaviors (e.g. immunizations) than habitual behaviors.

Reasoned Action & Planned Behavior Theory

This theory recognizes that individuals act rationally and emphasizes the power of individual’s intention to induce behavior governed by three principles:

Attitudes: the individual’s positive or negative feelings about engaging in a given behavior.

Subjective Norms: standards or influences established by the individual’s larger context, for instance, familial beliefs, media conceptions, and societal models.

Perceived Behavioral Control: the degree to which the individual could perform a behavior.

The theory is limited to discrete sample populations and does not incorporate profiles of previous behaviors nor does it address when positive intentions are not enough to enact behaviors (e.g. cues of action).

Learning Theories/Classical Conditioning

Based on the principles of classical conditioning, learning theories takes into account the previous responses individual’s had “learned” due to similar stimuli. Desired behaviors stem from positive experiences, associations, and thus responses to stimuli. Consequently, this theory allows reinforcing behaviors by way of rewards, but they are dependent on continual rewards – the precise problem in drug addiction and abuse.

Social Cognitive Theory

Through a variety of mediums, the social cognitive theory states that individuals observations affect behavior by two modes of modeling:

Direct Modeling: Observing others in their social network engaging in a particular behavior (i.e. vicarious learning)

Symbolic Modeling: Individuals more likely model behaviors by others they identify with as portrayed in the media.

Importantly, the modeled learning governed behavioral execution by the individual’s belief in their ability to engage in the behavior (self-efficacy) and consequences of carrying it out (expectancies).

This theory has proven successful in a variety of health-related behaviors, including, smoking cessation, condom use, and regular exercise.

Specialists have also mapped the traditional transtheoretical model or the newer precaution adoption process model in order to stop or reduce unhealthy traits and develop or enhance healthy actions (see table below). These two models categorize the changes individuals go through in the process of behavioral alteration in discrete stages.

Transtheoretical Model

Change is process divided into five stages:

Precontemplation - Unaware or ignorant of the problem, or underestimate its consequences or personal applicability.

Contemplation - Considering making a change to their behavior, often due to an increased awareness or realization of the issue.

Preparation - Commits to change, and organized steps to enact change within a specific time period.

Action - The behaviors are publicly modified to provoke change.

Maintenance - Sustains change, usually over six months

[At the action and maintenance stages, the individual is most prone to relapse.]

The model posits that change occurs in a spiral linear pattern, that is, the individual may move forward or backward until the change is complete.

Precaution Adoption Process Model

Change is process divided into seven stages:

Stage 1 – Now aware of the problem.

Stage 2 – Limited awareness, however, not appreciative of personal risk.

Stage 3 – Acknowledges personal susceptibility of hazard, but fails to make a decision on acting.

Stage 4 – Decides the action is unwarranted.

Stage 5 – Decides the action is warranted.

Stage 6 – The behaviors are publicly modified to provoke change.

Stage 7 – Sustains change, usually over six months

This new model of change further differentiates personal risk profiles and whether the person decides to act.

Further studies must evaluate the effectiveness of each model on predicting health behavioral change; however, it is likely that they are each best for specific types of individuals or behaviors.

Shaheen E Lakhan, MD, PhD, MEd, MS

Shaheen Lakhan, MD, PhD, MEd, MS, is executive director of the Global Neuroscience Initiative Foundation (GNIF). He is a published scholar in protein biomarkers, bioethics, biotechnology, education technology, and neurology. He serves on the editorial board of several scholarly publications and has been honored by the U.S. President and Congress.

Related Articles

  • Smoking Behavior and the Transtheoretical Model of the Stages of Change
  • The Evolving Health
  • Achieving Enlightened Competence
  • Health Psychology Research Methods
  • Changing the Error of Our Ways
  • Are Humans Hard-Wired to Torture?
  • The Emergence of Health Psychology

1 Response

    1. Health Behaviors More Important than Socioeconomic Status | Brain Blogger says:
      April 13, 2010 at 10:21 am

      [...] Now, a large-scale, longitudinal study asserts that the association may be more related to health behaviors than socioeconomic status. The study, published in the Journal of the American Medical Association [...]

      Reply

    Leave a Reply

    Click here to cancel reply.

    Subscribe without commenting


    Popular Posts

    • Mind Games - Science's Attempts at Thought Control
    • The Science of Stuttering
    • Risks of Personalized Medicine
    • Intelligence - Are You Holding Back Your Brain?
    • Is Grief a Mental Illness?
    • The Brain's Buying Power
    • The Cost of a Good Night's Sleep
    • Inside Your Brain on Holiday
    • Risk Factors for Recurrence of Depression
    • Salvia Divinorum - DEA Control over Magic in the Mint

    Future Posts

      Latest Posts

      • A Gateway to Weight Loss?
      • Intelligence – Do You Need it to be Successful?
      • A Trip for Terminal Patients
      • Memory Ain’t What It Used to Be – And That’s Good for Psychotherapy
      • The Science of Stuttering
      • Are Your Friends Making You Fat?
      • Beer – The Smarter Drink
      • Macroeconomics and Suicide
      • From Nymphomania to Hypersexuality
      • Commitment – It’s the new Love

      Comments

      • : I have used heroin for 20 year
      • Lino Baine: I am not aware that people wit
      • Lulu Jones: Hmm....this is interesting. I
      • Robert A. Yourell, MA: Hi Stephanie...OR they tried a
      • Stephnie: Based on the facts in the arti
      • Sammy: I was a test subject for one o
      • Veronica Pamoukaghlian, MA: Thank you for your insightful
      • Richard Kensinger, MSW: I agree w/ Howard Gardner's pe
      • Melbzi: Muso's and smoked pot.I q
      • Melbzi: I am 36 and from Melbourne Aus
      • CODER: When we get sick, really sick
      • Rusti Hauge: I don't see any evidence to th
      Sponsored Links

      SEO Company, IT Support, Free Cams, addicted, SEO, Designer Wholesale Sources, GNLD, chinese wholesale, memory improvement, Autism News Blog, Neurotherapist, HGH,  Retractable Banner Stands ,   Buy Altace ,   Florida Drug Rehab Center ,   male enhancement ,   bankers life and casualty company

      Copyright © 2005-2012 Brain Blogger sponsored by Global Neuroscience Initiative Foundation (GNIF). All Rights Reserved.
      Disclaimer | Privacy Policy | Feed | Log in | ISSN 1931-6224 | 0.403s
      9rules Network Member