Brain Blogger Home
  • Home
  • About
    • Editor's Note
    • Contributors
  • Advertise
  • Archives
    • By Author
    • By Topic
    • By Year
    • By Month
  • Contact
  • Contribute
  • Topics
    • Popular
    • Series
    • Video
    • Carnivals
  • Sitemap
  • Subscribe
  • Neuroscience & Neurology
  • Psychology & Psychiatry
  • Health & Healthcare
  • More >>
    • BioPsychoSocial Health
    • Complementary & Alternative Medicine
    • Drugs & Clinical Trials
    • History of Medicine
    • Law & Politics
    • Living with a Brain Disorder
    • Opinion
    • Site News
    • Stigmatization
Brain Blogger RSS Feed

Brain Blogger Feed - 3500+ Readers

Follow BB:

Brain Blogger on FaceBook Brain Blogger on twitter Brain Blogger on Flickr Brain Blogger on YouTube
BioPsychoSocial Health
February 15, 2006

The Biopsychosocial Model of Health & Illness

By Shaheen E Lakhan, MD, PhD, MEd, MS | 17 Comments | Share | Print | Email | Tweet | Like | 1+

BioPsychoSocial_Health.jpgHealth is traditionally equated to the absence of disease. A lack of a fundamental pathology was thought to define one’s health as good, whereas biologically driven pathogens and conditions would render an individual with poor health and the label “diseased”. However, such a narrow scope on health limited our understanding of wellbeing, thwarted our treatments efforts, and perhaps more importantly, suppressed prevention measures.

Many institutions and medical doctors have managed to incorporate a holistic view of health in sound medical application, primarily based on the Biopsychosocial (BPS) Model of Health and Illness. The concept of wellness is particularly stressed, where the state of being in good health based on the biopsychosocial model is accompanied by good quality of life and strong relationships.

In 1977, American Psychiatrist George Engel introduced the major theory in medicine, the BPS Model. The model accounted for biological, psychological, and sociological interconnected spectrums, each as systems of the body. In fact, the model accompanied a dramatic shift in focus from disease to health, recognizing that psychosocial factors (e.g. beliefs, relationships, stress) greatly impact recovery the progression of and recuperation from illness and disease.

Engel eloquently states:

To provide a basis for understanding the determinants of disease and arriving at a rational treatments and patterns of health care, a medical model must also take into account the patient, the social context in which he lives and the complementary system devised by society to deal with the disruptive effects of illness, that is, the physician role and the health care system. This requires a biopsychosocial model.

Today, individuals are living with diseases that would have taken their lives in the past. We see health and wellness is a broader forum. Medical practitioners are more frequently adopting the biopsychosocial form in their clinician practice. The following outline compares the presentation, diagnosis, and treatment used by physicians who follow the biomedical and biopsychosocial model:

Biomedical Model

Reason for visit: Patient complains of chest pain.

Presentation: The focus is on physical causes of disease. The physician will ask few questions on recent diet, pain history, and familial incidence, however, empirical signs and symptoms of myocardial infarction are considered paramount.

Diagnosis: The clinician will order objective lab tests and monitor vital signs (i.e. temperature, pulse, and blood pressure) that would form the sole basis of any finding.

Therapy: The doctor will prescribe a medicinal plan for the patient based on biological etiology and pathogenesis.

Biopsychosocial Model

Reason for visit: Patient complains of chest pain.

Presentation: The aim to ascertain psychosocial and physical processes that may cause the chief complain, chest pain. The physician may ask for a history of recent life stressors and behaviors.

Diagnosis: Based on a combination of psychological factors and standard lab tests, the clinician will form a diagnosis.

Therapy: The physician discusses the available interventions with special attention to behaviors and lifestyles that could influence her pain and adherence to the treatment plan. The patient is involved in formulating and implementing the plan, and maintains a supportive relationship with the clinician.

Shaheen E Lakhan, MD, PhD, MEd, MS

Shaheen Lakhan, MD, PhD, MEd, MS, is executive director of the Global Neuroscience Initiative Foundation (GNIF). He is a published scholar in protein biomarkers, bioethics, biotechnology, education technology, and neurology. He serves on the editorial board of several scholarly publications and has been honored by the U.S. President and Congress.

Related Articles

  • The Increasing Influence of Biopsychosocial Medicine
  • Integration of the Biopsychosocial Model in Contemporary Psychiatry
  • The Bane of Pain Is Plainly in the Brain
  • Latest Lines of Biopsychosocial Research
  • When Did the Brain Become Disconnected From the Body?
  • Biopsychosocial Model Transformations and Its Future
  • What is a D.O.?

17 Responses

  1. D.O. Student says:
    February 21, 2006 at 11:35 am

    Hmmm, nice counterbalance to the D.O. article on your site. It would be nice to know if this Engle was ever exposed to osteopathic training?

    Reply
  2. Anonymous says:
    February 26, 2006 at 4:12 pm

    While the Biopsychosocial Model demands further discourse and exploration and debate needs to continue as to which Medical model is most beneficial to which type of patient, it is important to understand some of the changes that permitted the growth from BioMedical to BioPsychoSocial.

    The first factor, and one of the most important, is the Science and medical field’s acceptance of psychology. While studies have for years touted that the mind and body are interconnected and hence, one influences the other; it was not until greater sophistication in medical tools such as imaging or scans that won skeptics over. Now, most doctors and clinicians may be inclined to admit several things. One, the brain controls most of our bodily functions. Two, intangible variables such as mood and stress affect the body and hence, the ability to fight off disease.

    The second factor is inter-related to the first. In the last twenty years or so, social scientists, psychologists and other researchers have turned their attention to not just illness but wellness as well. There was a hallmark study, completed in the mid 1990′s .It was entitled “The Macarthur Study on Successful Aging” (Rowe, JW. MD., Kahn, RL., MD). What made this research so remarkable was that it was the first time researchers thought to ask about what gave people pleasure. We know now that social interaction, friendships and even religiosity contribute to personal happiness and satisfaction which, in turn, helps to maintain physical well-being.

    Third, doctors are being proactive about the eternal problem of the patient’s medicinal non-compliance. Literature in many peer journals have for years explored and found the reasons why people do not take their medication as prescribed. While in the past noncompliance may not have bothered the doctor as much as vexed him or her, times have changed. The population is aging which means that some medications are integral to daily functioning and also, health insurance is tightening the belt.

    Research, such as that found in the Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (2002, (49): Kardas, P), has shown that while cost is a reason, it is not the only one. While the above study is limited in scope, an important point is that if non-compliance occurs in short term, respiratory illness, then imagine the rate for long term physical and/or psychiatric use.

    Some of these factors plus others may have coalesced into creating an atmosphere that allowed the Biopsychosocial Model to be born. What each component shares is greater understanding. There is greater understanding of how the brain functions, both on a physical and emotional basis, about the effect of external influences on the body and of course, a better understanding of patient behavior.

    I bring this up because they are as important as the Model itself and therefore, deserve some attention.

    I hope you will forgive my rambles. At times, I get curious not just about the new destination but also about the path that was tread.

    An overly garrulous,

    Always Learning

    Reply
    • Ms T A says:
      June 27, 2010 at 4:21 pm

      The models do not have to be mutually exclusive. Most health organizations espouse a multidisciplinary approach. Doctors can have this approach by allowing another healthcare provider to do the patient interview (for instance, a nurse, CRNP, PA, etc) and then the doctor coming in later and working collaboratively with the other HCP to reach a treatment plan (in conjunction with the patient, of course). If doctors really wanted to, they could have such services available in their offices.

      Reply
  3. Westy says:
    January 14, 2009 at 5:18 pm

    “In 1977, American Psychiatrist George Engel introduced the major theory in medicine, the BPS Model. The model accounted for biological, psychological, and sociological interconnected spectrums, each as systems of the body.”

    A common misunderstanding. Engels produced nothing that could be remotely described as a standard scientific model. What he did do was argue cogently for the necessity and importance of a biopsychosocial model. May seem like nitpicking, but it is important to get these basic facts right.

    As to the model itself. I, like most, do not have any in principle problem with such a model, and believe it is an advance in medical thinking.

    But the way it is often used is troubling. Far too much is simply ascribed to primary psychosocial causation (in particular somatisation, in all its guises) simply because the clinician can’t find any immediate primary physical cause. Yet even a cursory glance at the history of such diagnostic reasonings reveals a disturbingly persistent pattern of serious error. Just about every major disease has been ‘somatised’ at some point by medical science (well, the psychiatric branch of it), and yet they turned out to be primarily (or even entirely) physical disorders. The latest and perhaps most infamous major example being stomach ulcers, which were supposedly (indeed, undisputedly) the archetypal conversion disorder. Except they were not.

    Lack of clear primary physical causation (even when coupled with the presence serious emotional distress) is not solid evidence of somatisation, it could just as easily be evidence of the current limitation of biophysical medical science or the particular clinician, or both.

    /rant

    Reply
  4. James Pita MD says:
    February 4, 2009 at 10:54 am

    Agreed, there may not be a “standard scientific model for Dr Engel’s BPS theory. Mind-body-social-psychological axis is on-going in real people. We create models to try to explain real, natrual phenomena, the patient lives or dies, gets bettor or worse. Nothing happens in standard pressure or temperature.
    I have held the hand of a patient having a myocardial infarction and watched her ST segments normalize without mediciation. Did her coronaries dilate from empathy? Was it just a fluke? Some other factor? My energy field? No way of knowing. It just happened in real time, no model.

    The ulcer is for real, but so much mind-body-behavior is involved in worsening/healing. We have gotten much better at fixing than preventing (fixing is more profitable).

    JP MD

    Reply
  1. Pure Pedantry says:
    July 17, 2006 at 1:11 am

    Encephalon #2

    Evil Monkey from Neurotopia posts on face blindness or prosopagnosia, and how they have found a gene that results in a heritable form. They have not, to my knowledge, found a gene for why I can’t remember the girl who…

    Reply
  2. Brainblogger and GNIF « HealthSkills Weblog says:
    January 30, 2008 at 11:11 pm

    [...] biopsychosocial model.” They have their own Wikipedia entry Brain Blogger, and adhere to a biopsychosocial and interdisciplinary view of health, and the mind and [...]

    Reply
  3. My Medical Blog Community « Coolmristuff says:
    February 24, 2008 at 5:44 pm

    [...] as a focal point for attracting new minds beyond the science of the mind-and-brain and into the biopsychosocial [...]

    Reply
  4. Biopsychosocial Model Transformations and Its Future | GNIF Brain Blogger says:
    March 5, 2008 at 6:17 am

    [...] portrayal of the biopsychosocial model has significantly redefined psychiatry, medicine, and psychology. With the emergence of health [...]

    Reply
  5. Integrating Schizophrenia Management | GNIF Brain Blogger says:
    March 5, 2008 at 6:21 am

    [...] the relapse of psychotic episodes, and treat or prevent (further) co-morbidity. Clinicians employ a combination of pharmacological (neuroleptic) and psychosocial interventions according to the [...]

    Reply
  6. Vulnerability-Stress-Coping Model for Schizophrenia | GNIF Brain Blogger says:
    March 5, 2008 at 6:26 am

    [...] vulnerability-stress-coping model attempts to frame psychotic and affective disorders based on a biopsychosocial perspective (Nuechterlein & Dawson, 1984; Nuechterlein et al., 1994; Yank, Bentley, & [...]

    Reply
  7. Anxiety - More Than Just a Case of Nerves | GNIF Brain Blogger says:
    March 5, 2008 at 9:27 pm

    [...] Haller’s biopsychosocial sensitivities were evident after her formal narrative, when she entertained questions from the [...]

    Reply
  8. Mind and Body in Pain | GNIF Brain Blogger says:
    March 6, 2008 at 10:08 pm

    [...] Engel’s commitment to revolutionizing the health care sector remains important, for we are all affected as consumers, patients, practitioners, or administrators. His message is notably broad, for the scope of the holistic biopsychosocial model is virtually limitless – from psychiatry, immunology, and public health to pain, sexuality, and everyday life – and defines a wellness balance. This may explain the interconnected nature and difficulty in studying (and perhaps more so in treating disorders involving) these phenomena. [...]

    Reply
  9. The Evolving Health | GNIF Brain Blogger says:
    March 6, 2008 at 10:11 pm

    [...] for evolving health and seemingly apparent psychological associations, American Psychiatrist George Engel introduced a major theory in medicine, the biopsychosocial model of health and illness (1977). The [...]

    Reply
  10. Personality Influences Health | GNIF Brain Blogger says:
    March 6, 2008 at 10:14 pm

    [...] Ancient Asian medicine has long linked emotions and intention to health, however, Western medicine has been less receptive to devising a relationship. Recent lines of psychological studies demonstrate that the way people think, act, and feel about certain situations, events, and ideas greatly influence health behaviors and are represented in the biopsychosocial model of health and illness. [...]

    Reply
  11. Integration of the Biopsychosocial Model in Contemporary Psychiatry | GNIF Brain Blogger says:
    March 6, 2008 at 10:15 pm

    [...] Psychosis involves a disconnection with reality and perceptions outside the range of normality. Moreover, it is the common multifaceted symptom of psychotic disorders often accompanied by behavioral abnormalities and cognitive impairments. In fact, such characteristics are used to differentially classify conditions. Not only do these special illnesses require substantial medical care, but clinical management involves multidimensional schemata pursuant to the biopsychosocial model. [...]

    Reply
  12. The Osteopathic Psychiatrist and Depression | GNIF Brain Blogger says:
    March 6, 2008 at 10:17 pm

    [...] informed psychiatry recognizes the biopsychosocial principle that the body is able to affect the mind. Consider for example the phenomenon of chronic [...]

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Subscribe without commenting


Popular Posts

  • The Love Drug
  • Women After Sex
  • Fatty Acids and Suicide Risk
  • Mind Games - Science's Attempts at Thought Control
  • Risks of Personalized Medicine
  • Mental Health Disorders Prevalent Among Youth Worldwide
  • Is Giftedness Nothing More than Good Genes?
  • Behind the Masks - The Mysteries of Dissociative Identity Disorder
  • The NeuroSocial Network
  • Inside Your Brain on Holiday

Future Posts

  • The Brain’s Buying Power
  • Aging Intelligently

Latest Posts

  • A Nicotine Patch a Day Keeps the Cognitive Impairment Away
  • The Many Emerging Roles of Astrocytes
  • Diabetes Impairs Cognition
  • Media Violence Leads to Real Violence
  • Intelligence – Are You Holding Back Your Brain?
  • Childhood Aggression Predicts Health Care Use Later in Life
  • The Brain’s Border Patrol – Blood Brain Barrier
  • Risks of Personalized Medicine
  • BED-head and Obesity – Food for Thought
  • Salvia Divinorum – DEA Control over Magic in the Mint

Comments

  • Emily Haines, MSc, PhD student: Thanks for your comments, Matt
  • Emily Haines, MSc, PhD student: Thanks for your comments and s
  • Alex: While we have our eyes glued t
  • Richard Kensinger, MSW: Carla,You are absolutely c
  • Soraya L. Valles: I'm interested in astrocytes.
  • Raymond Tallis: Dear Kitty, I have come to you
  • Steven: After smoking for 17 years dai
  • Matt: I'm just interested in hearing
  • Carla Easley: If everyone adopted the "Growt
  • Isabel (retired RN): I second that query for resear
  • David: How about some citations to pe
  • MrsK: @Dawn - I agree with your stat
Sponsored Links

chinese wholesale, memory improvement, web design brisbane, Autism News Blog, Pharmaceutical Training, Neurotherapist, HGH, Banner Stands , Buy Prevacid Online , AtomicPR , treatment centers , Blood Tests California

Copyright © 2005-2012 Brain Blogger sponsored by Global Neuroscience Initiative Foundation (GNIF). All Rights Reserved.
Disclaimer | Privacy Policy | Feed | Log in | ISSN 1931-6224 | 0.983s
9rules Network Member