Brain Blogger Home
  • Home
  • About
    • Editor's Note
    • Contributors
    • Blog Carnival
  • Advertise
  • Archives
    • By Author
    • By Topic
    • By Year
    • By Month
  • Contact
  • Topics
    • Popular
    • Series
    • Video
  • Sitemap
  • Subscribe
  • Contribute
  • Neuroscience & Neurology
  • Psychology & Psychiatry
  • Health & Healthcare
  • More >>
    • BioPsychoSocial Health
    • Brain Blogging Carnival
    • Complementary & Alternative Medicine
    • Drugs & Clinical Trials
    • Drugs & Pharmacology Blog Carnival
    • History of Medicine
    • Law & Politics
    • Living with a Brain Disorder
    • Opinion
    • Site News
    • Stigmatization
Brain Blogger RSS Feed

Brain Blogger Feed & Subscription Options

Follow BB:

Brain Blogger on FaceBook Brain Blogger on twitter Brain Blogger on Flickr Brain Blogger on YouTube
Neuroscience & Neurology
April 28, 2010

The Brain Rejects Inequality

By Jennifer Gibson, PharmD | Share | 2 Comments
Rocks in balance

The human brain likes balance. Not simply biological and physiological homeostasis that maintains the proper functioning of the brain, but emotional, social and psychological balance. Notably, the human brain dislikes inequality when it comes to money, and rejects it at all costs, according to new research in the journal Nature.

Behavioral and anthropological evidence show that humans dislike social inequality and unfair distribution of outcomes. But this evidence is not purely social, anymore, since researchers at the California Institute of Technology and Trinity College in Dublin, Ireland, have identified reward centers in the brain that are sensitive to inequality. The authors examined functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) images of participants as they were presented with money-transfer scenarios. The volunteers participating in the study were initially randomized into 2 conditions: to receive a large monetary endowment at the beginning of the study ($50) or to start with no money. Participants were assigned to pairs — one participant from each of the monetary conditions — and the participants were offered the chance to transfer sums of money (between $0 and $50) between them.

The interesting finding was that the brains’ reward centers in the ventromedial prefrontal cortex (VMPFC) and ventral striatum responded differently to the money-transfer offers, depending on whether the participant started the experiment with money or without. Not surprisingly, the brains of the people who started the experiment with no money had strong reward-focused reactions to gaining money themselves, and basically no reaction to money going to someone else. However, the brains of people who started the experiment with money had a stronger reaction to other people gaining money than gaining money themselves.

This research is among the first to show that a dislike of fairness and inequality is more than just a social convention. On a physiological level, people are not as selfish as once believed. Similar studies preceding the current research demonstrated that the VMPFC is involved in making value-based decisions, including monetary gain, donation to charity and reciprocity. In several experiments, the brain rejected inequality and unfair offers, whether the outcome was monetarily advantageous or disadvantageous for the participant. Some researchers still claim that this behavior is based in emotions, rather than physiology. They postulate that humans reject inequality and attempt to restore fairness owing to anger or moral disgust over an unjust situation. Further, others contend that people who have money want to restore equity and balance to assuage their guilt and decrease their own discomfort over having more than other people.

While the new study demonstrates that humans are not completely focused on their own self-interests, it is unclear how the physiological evidence translates to behaviors in real-world circumstances. Humans experience physiological and emotional rewards from helping others and donating to charities, but the brain seems to stop short of wanting to redistribute wealth across the board. The association between work, reward and equality, and the brain’s mechanisms underlying all of them, remain unclear.

References

Guroglu, B., van den Bos, W., Rombouts, S., & Crone, E. (2010). Unfair? It depends: Neural correlates of fairness in social context Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience DOI: 10.1093/scan/nsq013

Hare, T., Camerer, C., Knoepfle, D., O’Doherty, J., & Rangel, A. (2010). Value Computations in Ventral Medial Prefrontal Cortex during Charitable Decision Making Incorporate Input from Regions Involved in Social Cognition Journal of Neuroscience, 30 (2), 583-590 DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4089-09.2010

Smith, D., Hayden, B., Truong, T., Song, A., Platt, M., & Huettel, S. (2010). Distinct Value Signals in Anterior and Posterior Ventromedial Prefrontal Cortex Journal of Neuroscience, 30 (7), 2490-2495 DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3319-09.2010

Takagishi H, Takahashi T, Toyomura A, Takashino N, Koizumi M, Yamagishi T. Neural correlates of the rejection of unfair offers in the impunity game. Neuro Endocrinol Lett. 2009;30(4):496-500.

Tricomi, E., Rangel, A., Camerer, C., & O’Doherty, J. (2010). Neural evidence for inequality-averse social preferences Nature, 463 (7284), 1089-1091 DOI: 10.1038/nature08785

Yamagishi, T., Horita, Y., Takagishi, H., Shinada, M., Tanida, S., & Cook, K. (2009). The private rejection of unfair offers and emotional commitment Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106 (28), 11520-11523 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0900636106

Jennifer Gibson, PharmD

Dr. Gibson is a practicing clinical pharmacist and freelance medical writer and editor with experience in researching and preparing scientific publications, developing public relations materials, creating educational resources and presentations, and editing technical manuscripts. Her clients include academic research institutions, international authors, pharmaceutical companies, professional organizations, and public advocacy groups.

Related Articles

  • Income Inequality and Health Outcomes
  • Social and Physical Pain Share Neural Architecture
  • Is Sugar the New Cocaine?
  • Religion – A “Natural” Phenomenon?
  • Free Will and the Philosophy of Science
  • Leg Length and Osteoarthritis
  • Deep Brain Stimulation for Pleasure

2 Responses

  1. Items of Interest « @H+ :: Anarcho-Transhumanism says:
    April 29, 2010 at 6:05 pm

    [...] The Brain Rejects Inequality: Physiological responses to unfairness. [...]

    Reply
  2. Situationism in the Blogosphere – April, Part I « The Situationist says:
    May 18, 2010 at 9:02 pm

    [...] From Brain Blogger: “The Brain Rejects Inequality” [...]

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Subscribe without commenting


Popular Posts

  • Psychotropics and Youth, Part 1 - The Five Myths
  • Why Some Human Brains Become Leaders, While Others Followers?
  • Goal Setting - Pitfalls and Benefits
  • Clinical Psychologists' Perceptions of Persons with Mental Illness
  • "I Feel Your Pain" - The Neural Basis of Empathy
  • Too Much Information?
  • Ginkgo Biloba Ineffective... Again
  • Journal Retracts Autism Research
  • Speaking in Tongues - A Neural Snapshot
  • Psychotropics and Youth, Part 2 - The Solutions
  • Deep Brain Stimulation - A New Frontier in Psychiatry
  • Pulling The Plug Too Soon?
  • Exercise - It Works For Depression

Future Posts

  • Social Interaction at the Work Place – A Case Study Analysis
  • Climbing Through the Window – How to Heal Past Trauma
  • Tea for Two

Latest Posts

  • Mind your Immune System
  • The Handwriting on the Wall
  • Social Media and Mental Health
  • The Bold and the Beautiful
  • Achieving Enlightened Competence
  • Only the Brain is Worried about Getting Fat
  • Goal Setting – Pitfalls and Benefits
  • Medical Art Imitating Life
  • Female Teachers’ Math Anxiety Negatively Affects Female Students
  • Antidepressants Carry Equal Risks

Comments

  • Helena Vidaurri: Impressive paper! Indeed, we
  • Mike Lisieski: There's some research on testi
  • : yes i totally agree that choco
  • : Enviroment is key and cause of
  • Lisa Geng: Apraxia/dyspraxia is a motor p
  • Brian: Perhaps you might focus more o
  • isabella mori: Brian - you're right, I could
  • Brian: how social media
  • Andrew: Religion is here because men a
  • Diana: I wonder what Deepak Chopra wo
  • Snoa Flaik: I have never read so many moro
  • Evan: My view is that work should be
Sponsored Links

Life insurance, Brain Fitness DVD, San Francisco Doctor, Best vitamins supplements, Online Criminal Justice Degrees, Alcohol Rehab, Tattoo, Cheap Mobile Phone , Banner Stands , Biomedical Research , Breast Cancer , Buy Prevacid , Cystic Fibrosis Signs Symptoms , Erlotinib , Affordable Health Insurance , Colon Cancer Treatment , Edgepark Medical , Mattress , Astrology compatibility.

Copyright © 2005-2010 Global Neuroscience Initiative Foundation (GNIF). All Rights Reserved.
Disclaimer | Privacy Policy | RSS Feed | Log in | 1.435s
9rules Network Member