<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Narcolepsy Treatment May Lead to Abuse</title> <atom:link href="http://brainblogger.com/2009/07/19/narcolepsy-treatment-may-lead-to-abuse/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://brainblogger.com/2009/07/19/narcolepsy-treatment-may-lead-to-abuse/</link> <description>Topics from multidimensional biopsychosocial perspectives</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 17:27:25 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: LBickers</title><link>http://brainblogger.com/2009/07/19/narcolepsy-treatment-may-lead-to-abuse/#comment-555989</link> <dc:creator>LBickers</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 11:39:08 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://brainblogger.com/?p=2937#comment-555989</guid> <description>I was diagnosed with Narcolepsy in 1998.  I took Provigil the first time in 2000.  I went off of it when I became pregnant and started back on Provigil in 2007 when my symptoms could no longer be controlled without the medication.  Since starting back on my current dose of 300 mg a day ( I do not utilize the entire dose unless I will be driving long distances) of which I take 200 mg on a regular basis, other than the initial &quot;getting used to&quot; the drug, I have not experienced any ill side effects and am able to go without the drug on the weekends and when I am not going to be engaging in activities that might otherwise bring on more fatigue.  I also would like to say that although I take 200 mg a day, my blood pressure remains a steady 90/60 and a heart rate of about 80.  I would not be able to lead a &quot;normal&quot; life without Provigil and would like to state that all drugs have different effects on different individuals.  I had to change my lifestyle to accommodate my illness and the Provigil helps me to function on a daily basis.  I am thankful for this drug.  My only complaint is that Cephalon will not lift its hold on the drug to allow a more affordable generic form of this medication.  I would not be able to take it if not for my coinsurance.  This drug is ridiculously priced at $900 for 90 pills and $550+ for 60 pills.  I feel for those individuals with this illness that do not have the means to purchase this if they suffer from narcolepsy.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was diagnosed with Narcolepsy in 1998.  I took Provigil the first time in 2000.  I went off of it when I became pregnant and started back on Provigil in 2007 when my symptoms could no longer be controlled without the medication.  Since starting back on my current dose of 300 mg a day ( I do not utilize the entire dose unless I will be driving long distances) of which I take 200 mg on a regular basis, other than the initial &#8220;getting used to&#8221; the drug, I have not experienced any ill side effects and am able to go without the drug on the weekends and when I am not going to be engaging in activities that might otherwise bring on more fatigue.  I also would like to say that although I take 200 mg a day, my blood pressure remains a steady 90/60 and a heart rate of about 80.  I would not be able to lead a &#8220;normal&#8221; life without Provigil and would like to state that all drugs have different effects on different individuals.  I had to change my lifestyle to accommodate my illness and the Provigil helps me to function on a daily basis.  I am thankful for this drug.  My only complaint is that Cephalon will not lift its hold on the drug to allow a more affordable generic form of this medication.  I would not be able to take it if not for my coinsurance.  This drug is ridiculously priced at $900 for 90 pills and $550+ for 60 pills.  I feel for those individuals with this illness that do not have the means to purchase this if they suffer from narcolepsy.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: All Things That Rise &#124; AI Digest: 7/28/09. Abuse of Narcolepsy Drug (Modafinil)?</title><link>http://brainblogger.com/2009/07/19/narcolepsy-treatment-may-lead-to-abuse/#comment-555963</link> <dc:creator>All Things That Rise &#124; AI Digest: 7/28/09. Abuse of Narcolepsy Drug (Modafinil)?</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 15:01:10 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://brainblogger.com/?p=2937#comment-555963</guid> <description>[...]  Scientific Computing: &#8220;Narcolepsy Treatment May Lead to Abuse.&#8221; Article about modafinil. [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  Scientific Computing: &#8220;Narcolepsy Treatment May Lead to Abuse.&#8221; Article about modafinil. [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Presseschau &#8211; Neuroenhancement 24.07.09 &#124; emptysignifier &#124; The Weblog of Jacob Fricke</title><link>http://brainblogger.com/2009/07/19/narcolepsy-treatment-may-lead-to-abuse/#comment-555584</link> <dc:creator>Presseschau &#8211; Neuroenhancement 24.07.09 &#124; emptysignifier &#124; The Weblog of Jacob Fricke</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 15:58:14 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://brainblogger.com/?p=2937#comment-555584</guid> <description>[...] Neueren Untersuchungen in den USA widersprechen fr&#252;heren Studien zu Modafinil. Demnach hat das Medikament einen st&#228;rkeren Einfluss auf den Dopaminhaushalt als man bisher glaubte. In dem Artikel wird die Wirkung mit den Belohnungseffekten von Kokain verglichen. Daraus ergebe sich eine ungleich h&#246;here Gefahr der Abh&#228;ngigkeit. Allerdings nahmen nur 10 Personen an dieser Studie teil. [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Neueren Untersuchungen in den USA widersprechen fr&#252;heren Studien zu Modafinil. Demnach hat das Medikament einen st&#228;rkeren Einfluss auf den Dopaminhaushalt als man bisher glaubte. In dem Artikel wird die Wirkung mit den Belohnungseffekten von Kokain verglichen. Daraus ergebe sich eine ungleich h&#246;here Gefahr der Abh&#228;ngigkeit. Allerdings nahmen nur 10 Personen an dieser Studie teil. [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Lesley</title><link>http://brainblogger.com/2009/07/19/narcolepsy-treatment-may-lead-to-abuse/#comment-555552</link> <dc:creator>Lesley</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 04:13:51 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://brainblogger.com/?p=2937#comment-555552</guid> <description>Interesting, Bruce.I researched provigil very well when I first went on it and found very little of this information.  Can you post sources? &#039;m not denying that you went through something horrific with DRESS.  For me, provigil has been a lifesaver and I&#039;m not eager to stop taking it, but if it&#039;s too risky, I will weigh the evidence.  But I need to find evidence.I know about Stevens-Johnson syndrome and Sparlon.  I&#039;m talking about the number of cardiovascular events and whether the thousands of deaths are more than you&#039;d expect with any other drug of this class?Anyway, if you point me in the right direction, I&#039;ll look it up.  Thanks for the heads-up.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting, Bruce.</p><p>I researched provigil very well when I first went on it and found very little of this information.  Can you post sources? &#8216;m not denying that you went through something horrific with DRESS.  For me, provigil has been a lifesaver and I&#8217;m not eager to stop taking it, but if it&#8217;s too risky, I will weigh the evidence.  But I need to find evidence.</p><p>I know about Stevens-Johnson syndrome and Sparlon.  I&#8217;m talking about the number of cardiovascular events and whether the thousands of deaths are more than you&#8217;d expect with any other drug of this class?</p><p>Anyway, if you point me in the right direction, I&#8217;ll look it up.  Thanks for the heads-up.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Bruce</title><link>http://brainblogger.com/2009/07/19/narcolepsy-treatment-may-lead-to-abuse/#comment-555426</link> <dc:creator>Bruce</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 05:18:01 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://brainblogger.com/?p=2937#comment-555426</guid> <description>Provigil first reached the US market in 1998. For reasons which defy logic no serious attention was  paid by the FDA to nine years of reports by ER doctors and cardiologists of known deaths caused by  Provigil and its twin Nuvigil , which by late 2007 had already numbered into the the 1000s ( THOUSANDS ) according to the FDA&#039;s own records.  Finally, in 2006 an FDA committee refused to permit Provigil &#039;s manufacturer, Cephalon, to market Provigil  ( under the name Sparlon ) for the treatment of ADHD  because, while Provigil was effective for ADHD, the physicians determined that Provigil was simply too dangerous for such widespread use.With the grave dangers Provigil presented finally disclosed in that 2006 decision, a year later the FDA issued warnings to the the medical community and ordered Cephalon to include bold-print warnings of Provigil &#039;s potential for causing various manifestations of what has been called &quot; Delayed Reaction Drug Hypersensitivity Syndrome&quot;.  This syndrome, not to be confused with the everyday allergic reactions which most drugs are capable of causing , is an insidious one because it does not occur soon after Provigil therapy is begun but rather occurs no sooner than 2 weeks after daily use has started and usually no later than 3 months after.The illnesses Provigil causes once they manifest themselves are invariable sudden, severe , at first inexplicable , and life-threatening if the condition is not recognized promptly .  These conditions include Stevens - Johnson syndrome . TENS and other sudden severe manifestations of skin rashes whcih can, within 24 hours, become functionally identical to 3rd degree burns and as disfiguring.  Less easily identified and thus far more likely to remain unattributed to Provigil , even post - mortem. is DRESS syndrome, a condition which, once it takes hold can lead to a near total shutdown of the body&#039;s vital systems - the kidneys, the heart, the lungs the liver the intestinal system and the brain.  Only heroic and immediate medical aatention in the form of total life support can forstall a rapid death.  At that survival is no more than 20% after 48 hours.I was struck down by DRESS syndrome 2 months after I began taking Provigil.  While I did defy the odds in surviving the complete breakdown of my bodily systems, my survival such as it is was not one involving what I would call &quot;luck&quot; , other than it gives me the opportunity to warn others of this so-called &#039;innocuous&#039; drug and to suggest that those who need to remain awake rely upon upon dextroamphetamine, a remarkably safe drug with a 75 year track record of safety.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Provigil first reached the US market in 1998. For reasons which defy logic no serious attention was  paid by the FDA to nine years of reports by ER doctors and cardiologists of known deaths caused by  Provigil and its twin Nuvigil , which by late 2007 had already numbered into the the 1000s ( THOUSANDS ) according to the FDA&#8217;s own records.  Finally, in 2006 an FDA committee refused to permit Provigil &#8216;s manufacturer, Cephalon, to market Provigil  ( under the name Sparlon ) for the treatment of ADHD  because, while Provigil was effective for ADHD, the physicians determined that Provigil was simply too dangerous for such widespread use.</p><p>With the grave dangers Provigil presented finally disclosed in that 2006 decision, a year later the FDA issued warnings to the the medical community and ordered Cephalon to include bold-print warnings of Provigil &#8216;s potential for causing various manifestations of what has been called &#8221; Delayed Reaction Drug Hypersensitivity Syndrome&#8221;.  This syndrome, not to be confused with the everyday allergic reactions which most drugs are capable of causing , is an insidious one because it does not occur soon after Provigil therapy is begun but rather occurs no sooner than 2 weeks after daily use has started and usually no later than 3 months after.</p><p>The illnesses Provigil causes once they manifest themselves are invariable sudden, severe , at first inexplicable , and life-threatening if the condition is not recognized promptly .  These conditions include Stevens &#8211; Johnson syndrome . TENS and other sudden severe manifestations of skin rashes whcih can, within 24 hours, become functionally identical to 3rd degree burns and as disfiguring.  Less easily identified and thus far more likely to remain unattributed to Provigil , even post &#8211; mortem. is DRESS syndrome, a condition which, once it takes hold can lead to a near total shutdown of the body&#8217;s vital systems &#8211; the kidneys, the heart, the lungs the liver the intestinal system and the brain.  Only heroic and immediate medical aatention in the form of total life support can forstall a rapid death.  At that survival is no more than 20% after 48 hours.</p><p>I was struck down by DRESS syndrome 2 months after I began taking Provigil.  While I did defy the odds in surviving the complete breakdown of my bodily systems, my survival such as it is was not one involving what I would call &#8220;luck&#8221; , other than it gives me the opportunity to warn others of this so-called &#8216;innocuous&#8217; drug and to suggest that those who need to remain awake rely upon upon dextroamphetamine, a remarkably safe drug with a 75 year track record of safety.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: windhill</title><link>http://brainblogger.com/2009/07/19/narcolepsy-treatment-may-lead-to-abuse/#comment-555213</link> <dc:creator>windhill</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 20:35:22 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://brainblogger.com/?p=2937#comment-555213</guid> <description>Having taken both Provogil and amphetamines to treat MS-related fatigue I can attest to their similar effects. Provigil is a little gentler on heart rate and seems to leave me less cranky, otherwise the effects are very similar. On &quot;bad&quot;days all it seems to do is wake me up enough to let me know how tired I am....One factor likely to lessen abuse is the outrageous price of $10/day. No generic is available in this country and the insurance companies only approve it for specific diagnoses, and will not let you exceed your monthly allowance if you are lucky enough to be covered. ( I am not) I wouldn&#039;t know if it is available on the street. .</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having taken both Provogil and amphetamines to treat MS-related fatigue I can attest to their similar effects. Provigil is a little gentler on heart rate and seems to leave me less cranky, otherwise the effects are very similar. On &#8220;bad&#8221;days all it seems to do is wake me up enough to let me know how tired I am&#8230;.</p><p>One factor likely to lessen abuse is the outrageous price of $10/day. No generic is available in this country and the insurance companies only approve it for specific diagnoses, and will not let you exceed your monthly allowance if you are lucky enough to be covered. ( I am not) I wouldn&#8217;t know if it is available on the street. .</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 1/3 queries in 0.003 seconds using apc
Object Caching 312/312 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via dna.brainblogger.com

Served from: brainblogger.com @ 2012-02-09 14:50:50 -->
