<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: What is Free Will?</title> <atom:link href="http://brainblogger.com/2009/05/22/what-is-free-will/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://brainblogger.com/2009/05/22/what-is-free-will/</link> <description>Topics from multidimensional biopsychosocial perspectives</description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 18:44:48 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Rich Life Carnival #37 &#124; Rich Life Equals Better Life</title><link>http://brainblogger.com/2009/05/22/what-is-free-will/#comment-597550</link> <dc:creator>Rich Life Carnival #37 &#124; Rich Life Equals Better Life</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 06:18:44 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://brainblogger.com/?p=2775#comment-597550</guid> <description>[...] Blogger presents What is Free Will? posted at Brain Blogger, saying, &#8220;This post continues my discussion of free will and [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Blogger presents What is Free Will? posted at Brain Blogger, saying, &#8220;This post continues my discussion of free will and [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: bill d</title><link>http://brainblogger.com/2009/05/22/what-is-free-will/#comment-597091</link> <dc:creator>bill d</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 16:56:20 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://brainblogger.com/?p=2775#comment-597091</guid> <description>you can not stop being you , therefore you have no free will , i thought that neurologists had already proved that the action centre of the brain kicks in before the recognition part ?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you can not stop being you , therefore you have no free will , i thought that neurologists had already proved that the action centre of the brain kicks in before the recognition part ?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: sandy</title><link>http://brainblogger.com/2009/05/22/what-is-free-will/#comment-596631</link> <dc:creator>sandy</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 12:05:44 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://brainblogger.com/?p=2775#comment-596631</guid> <description>it most important part of  our  body so we must care for it...And also advise to other people  for be carefull.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it most important part of  our  body so we must care for it&#8230;And also advise to other people  for be carefull.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Sergio Pulido</title><link>http://brainblogger.com/2009/05/22/what-is-free-will/#comment-577184</link> <dc:creator>Sergio Pulido</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 21:45:17 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://brainblogger.com/?p=2775#comment-577184</guid> <description>&quot;Free will can be defined as choosing one’s actions or course&quot;http://www.ted.com/talks/lang/eng/dan_ariely_asks_are_we_in_control_of_our_own_decisions.htmlI think there are a lot of things that makes us take a course of action that we think we made alone, but we didn&#039;t</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Free will can be defined as choosing one’s actions or course&#8221;</p><p><a href="http://www.ted.com/talks/lang/eng/dan_ariely_asks_are_we_in_control_of_our_own_decisions.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.ted.com/talks/lang/eng/dan_ariely_asks_are_we_in_control_of_our_own_decisions.html</a></p><p>I think there are a lot of things that makes us take a course of action that we think we made alone, but we didn&#8217;t</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: bob</title><link>http://brainblogger.com/2009/05/22/what-is-free-will/#comment-545794</link> <dc:creator>bob</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 18:42:48 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://brainblogger.com/?p=2775#comment-545794</guid> <description>I think we talk about free will the same way we talk about our emotions and thoughts - like they have an existence apart from &quot;us&quot;.   This sensation of existing is partially the result of the fuctional necessity of a point of view.  The sensation of an ongoing point of view leads us to falsely infer that we exist somehow separately from  our environment.  This sensation is so strong and we have invested so much meaning into it, that, under normal circumstances,  we equate its reality with the appearance of phenonomen.Scientific materiialism takes the apppearance of  phenonomen as the definition of reality.  But this reults in a basic error - that things exist somehow separately from each other.  Phenonomen exist only in relation to other phenonomen.  The appearance of functionality requires a point of view.  Parts are only parts because of their relation to a whole.  A whole is a whole only because it has parts and becuase we identify a function for it.The sensation of free will exists without a doubt.  That sensation has functional value in our cognitive processes increasing our ability to adapt and respond to our environment.  What&#039;s wrong with that?Oh of couse MEANING!  What gives life meaning is helping each other.  Everything else is extra and just gets in the way.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think we talk about free will the same way we talk about our emotions and thoughts &#8211; like they have an existence apart from &#8220;us&#8221;.   This sensation of existing is partially the result of the fuctional necessity of a point of view.  The sensation of an ongoing point of view leads us to falsely infer that we exist somehow separately from  our environment.  This sensation is so strong and we have invested so much meaning into it, that, under normal circumstances,  we equate its reality with the appearance of phenonomen.</p><p> Scientific materiialism takes the apppearance of  phenonomen as the definition of reality.  But this reults in a basic error &#8211; that things exist somehow separately from each other.  Phenonomen exist only in relation to other phenonomen.  The appearance of functionality requires a point of view.  Parts are only parts because of their relation to a whole.  A whole is a whole only because it has parts and becuase we identify a function for it.</p><p>The sensation of free will exists without a doubt.  That sensation has functional value in our cognitive processes increasing our ability to adapt and respond to our environment.  What&#8217;s wrong with that?</p><p>Oh of couse MEANING!  What gives life meaning is helping each other.  Everything else is extra and just gets in the way.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: u joints</title><link>http://brainblogger.com/2009/05/22/what-is-free-will/#comment-541957</link> <dc:creator>u joints</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 03:14:17 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://brainblogger.com/?p=2775#comment-541957</guid> <description>Looking forward to the next instalment.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looking forward to the next instalment.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Carnival of Positive Thinking : Widows Quest - Redefine Yourself and Rediscover Life after a Loss</title><link>http://brainblogger.com/2009/05/22/what-is-free-will/#comment-541545</link> <dc:creator>Carnival of Positive Thinking : Widows Quest - Redefine Yourself and Rediscover Life after a Loss</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 17:35:32 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://brainblogger.com/?p=2775#comment-541545</guid> <description>[...] Blogger presents What is Free Will? posted at Brain Blogger, saying, &#8220;This post continues my discussion of free will and [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Blogger presents What is Free Will? posted at Brain Blogger, saying, &#8220;This post continues my discussion of free will and [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jared</title><link>http://brainblogger.com/2009/05/22/what-is-free-will/#comment-539366</link> <dc:creator>Jared</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 21:49:43 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://brainblogger.com/?p=2775#comment-539366</guid> <description>I agree T_U_T - free will cannot simply be indeterminism. It&#039;s such a hard concept to really define. It&#039;s a bit like describing the taste of salt - we know what it tastes like but it&#039;s quite hard to describe it, especially if you don&#039;t use things like &quot;it&#039;s not sweet&quot; and so forth.Thanks Evan and thanks for your example. That example is similar to what many neuroscientists view about free will. They believe that our actions are determined, except for just at the end when we can make a choice and stop that behavior. That&#039;s how many neuroscientists reconcile free will with determinism - free will holds the trump card that can be played to overcome natural (deterministic) behaviors. That&#039;s a bit simplistic of an explanation but it will do.Stephen, you raise some excellent points. I can&#039;t really address the question of whether or not there is a Self in part because it&#039;s not an area I&#039;ve studied much but also because it starts a completely different (but related) philosophical discussion. There is a fair amount of &quot;selfhood&quot; research in psychology and neuropsychology, it&#039;s just not something I&#039;ve read yet.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree T_U_T &#8211; free will cannot simply be indeterminism. It&#8217;s such a hard concept to really define. It&#8217;s a bit like describing the taste of salt &#8211; we know what it tastes like but it&#8217;s quite hard to describe it, especially if you don&#8217;t use things like &#8220;it&#8217;s not sweet&#8221; and so forth.</p><p>Thanks Evan and thanks for your example. That example is similar to what many neuroscientists view about free will. They believe that our actions are determined, except for just at the end when we can make a choice and stop that behavior. That&#8217;s how many neuroscientists reconcile free will with determinism &#8211; free will holds the trump card that can be played to overcome natural (deterministic) behaviors. That&#8217;s a bit simplistic of an explanation but it will do.</p><p>Stephen, you raise some excellent points. I can&#8217;t really address the question of whether or not there is a Self in part because it&#8217;s not an area I&#8217;ve studied much but also because it starts a completely different (but related) philosophical discussion. There is a fair amount of &#8220;selfhood&#8221; research in psychology and neuropsychology, it&#8217;s just not something I&#8217;ve read yet.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Stephen Pritchard</title><link>http://brainblogger.com/2009/05/22/what-is-free-will/#comment-539170</link> <dc:creator>Stephen Pritchard</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 00:35:26 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://brainblogger.com/?p=2775#comment-539170</guid> <description>Ignoring quantum physics for a second:The world = deterministic The world = me + &#039;the rest of the world not me&#039; &quot;The rest of the world not me&quot; is *not* deterministicBecause the &quot;me&quot; can act on and influence &quot;the rest of the world not me&quot;.So once you define something and call it a &#039;self&#039;, then free will easily follows. The real question is not &#039;is there free will?&#039;, its &#039;is there a self?&#039;Can you really draw a boundary between you and the rest of the world in a scientific manner?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ignoring quantum physics for a second:</p><p>The world = deterministic<br /> The world = me + &#8216;the rest of the world not me&#8217;<br /> &#8220;The rest of the world not me&#8221; is *not* deterministic</p><p>Because the &#8220;me&#8221; can act on and influence &#8220;the rest of the world not me&#8221;.</p><p>So once you define something and call it a &#8216;self&#8217;, then free will easily follows. The real question is not &#8216;is there free will?&#8217;, its &#8216;is there a self?&#8217;</p><p>Can you really draw a boundary between you and the rest of the world in a scientific manner?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Encephalon #71: Big Night &#171; Neuroanthropology</title><link>http://brainblogger.com/2009/05/22/what-is-free-will/#comment-538901</link> <dc:creator>Encephalon #71: Big Night &#171; Neuroanthropology</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 19:40:43 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://brainblogger.com/?p=2775#comment-538901</guid> <description>[...] Jared Tanner, Brain Blogger What is Free Will? [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Jared Tanner, Brain Blogger What is Free Will? [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Bob Todd</title><link>http://brainblogger.com/2009/05/22/what-is-free-will/#comment-538070</link> <dc:creator>Bob Todd</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 21:04:12 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://brainblogger.com/?p=2775#comment-538070</guid> <description>http://home.earthlink.net/~btodd2/freewillnote.html</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://home.earthlink.net/~btodd2/freewillnote.html" rel="nofollow">http://home.earthlink.net/~btodd2/freewillnote.html</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Evan</title><link>http://brainblogger.com/2009/05/22/what-is-free-will/#comment-537834</link> <dc:creator>Evan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 23:34:48 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://brainblogger.com/?p=2775#comment-537834</guid> <description>Hi Jared,Looking forward to the next instalment.Perhaps free will is being aware of an impulsion to behave one way and not doing this but something else.  Eg I want to swear at simple minded determinists but choose to engage them in conversation instead(?)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jared,</p><p>Looking forward to the next instalment.</p><p>Perhaps free will is being aware of an impulsion to behave one way and not doing this but something else.  Eg I want to swear at simple minded determinists but choose to engage them in conversation instead(?)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: T_U_T</title><link>http://brainblogger.com/2009/05/22/what-is-free-will/#comment-537557</link> <dc:creator>T_U_T</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 14:33:51 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://brainblogger.com/?p=2775#comment-537557</guid> <description>If free will is just indeterminism then random white noise generator is the freest thing int the universe.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If free will is just indeterminism then random white noise generator is the freest thing int the universe.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 1/3 queries in 0.006 seconds using apc
Object Caching 388/389 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via dna.brainblogger.com

Served from: brainblogger.com @ 2012-02-09 17:06:54 -->
