
Conflicts of Interest Among Physicians II
I previously posted a few times about conflicts of interest within the medical profession. A friend of a friend who reads my posts posed the simple question to me:
Isn’t the entire medical profession in conflict because it is profit driven?
This is an interesting question. After all, doctors make their living either seeing patients or doing procedures. No office visits, consultations, or surgeries then no income is generated. Thus wouldn’t doctors all benefit from making sure that patients keep coming back and that more procedures are done? Unfortunately this is true. It’s kind of like taking your car to the mechanic and asking what is wrong and for him to fix it. Of course you need a new transmission and spark plug and timing belt. Without it how is he going to feed his family and pay his mortgage? Luckily doctors take an oath to place their patients interests first. Do mechanics do the same? Maybe. Maybe not. Do lawyers do the same?
I don’t ever see a solution to this problem, unless we move to a system where doctors are all salaried and receive no reimbursement based on volume or procedures. But I don’t think that will ever happen. Physicians are entrepreneurial and that is why the private practice of medicine exists today. Granted, more doctors are moving towards working for salaries but there will always be a paying customer for specialized elective services. People will always be willing to pay a premium to have that special procedure or see that specialized physician.
So is it really a problem that doctors profit from their work? I say no. Every other profession makes money from their work AND most of those professions don’t take an oath to out the customer above all else.
2 Responses
Leave a Reply
Popular Posts
- Mind Games - Science's Attempts at Thought Control
- The Science of Stuttering
- Risks of Personalized Medicine
- Intelligence - Are You Holding Back Your Brain?
- Is Grief a Mental Illness?
- The Brain's Buying Power
- The Cost of a Good Night's Sleep
- Risk Factors for Recurrence of Depression
- Salvia Divinorum - DEA Control over Magic in the Mint
- The Many Emerging Roles of Astrocytes
Future Posts
Latest Posts
- Thinking Fast Equals Risky Business
- A Gateway to Weight Loss?
- Intelligence – Do You Need it to be Successful?
- A Trip for Terminal Patients
- Memory Ain’t What It Used to Be – And That’s Good for Psychotherapy
- The Science of Stuttering
- Are Your Friends Making You Fat?
- Beer – The Smarter Drink
- Macroeconomics and Suicide
- From Nymphomania to Hypersexuality
Comments
- Ryan: Great post! I agree with the p
- : I have used heroin for 20 year
- Lino Baine: I am not aware that people wit
- Lulu Jones: Hmm....this is interesting. I
- Robert A. Yourell, MA: Hi Stephanie...OR they tried a
- Stephnie: Based on the facts in the arti
- Sammy: I was a test subject for one o
- Veronica Pamoukaghlian, MA: Thank you for your insightful
- Richard Kensinger, MSW: I agree w/ Howard Gardner's pe
- Melbzi: Muso's and smoked pot.I q
- Melbzi: I am 36 and from Melbourne Aus
- CODER: When we get sick, really sick









In Canada, where all docs are salaried, efforts to add a private tier
to the national health care system have been defeated in Parliament.
Just as insurance companies have no place in a health care system
for the US, docs should not be in charge of the financial management of the health
care system. Health care needs to be a service provided by government
to all citizens, not a businees in which the entrepreneurial do best.
Medicine is a profession whose values have been threatened by business.
Doctors should earn good salaries for working a set number of hours, with
compensation from the gov’t for student loans, etc.
As the wife of a physician and a health care professional, I think doctors
are being shafted, but I have no sympathy for those who feel they’re entitled
to exorbitant incomes driven by procedures and who increasingly refuse
to accept insurance and public medical programs..
A related question: how is compliance with the oath ensured. By doctors, no? Hmm.