Buddhism is not a theistic religion, and meditation does not involve faith in anything. So that’s a bad example.

Hi,

Thanks for visiting my site.

Based on my readings of Bhagawad Gita and elsewhere, essentially all living beings are souls in a living body.

Humans have their souls in spinal cord, and the degree of their realization of the supreme soul, lord Krishna, aided by their brains through analysis, logic, understanding eternal truth, determines how intelligent they are.

I guess the more intelligent a person is, more developed his brain will be!

If the cornerstone of Christianity is faith, why did Jesus do all that talking? Why not just say “look, see my miracles? Have faith in me!” The idea that it is the fact that the existence of God can’t be proven that is what is important about Christianity is nonsense. The idea that if you could prove the existence of God, religion would no longer have any point, is nonsense.

The point of faith is to get you to do what the religion tells you to do to get to whatever result it promises. So in the case of Christianity, it’s to get you to follow the teachings of Jesus, and in the case of Judaism, to keep the mitzvot. If you find proof that God exists, would that stop you from following the teachings, or from keeping the mitzvot? No, just the opposite. So the unprovability of the existence of God is not essential to the practice of these theistic religions.

I mention this because I see various athiest web sites repeating this error with great regularity, perhaps stemming from Douglas Adam’s famous proof of the nonexistence of God. It was funny, but it wasn’t correct. We would hope to see better from the reality-based community.

(Disclosure: I’m a Buddhist, and we don’t consider the idea of an all-powerful creator God useful, so we neither assert nor deny the existence of such a being.)

You stopped by my blog and left your link asking me to comment on your post.

I have nothing to say about what you have written. It is dismissive and, it seems to me, not in complete understanding of, at minimum, historical Christian faith.

jerry

Hello, thanks for visiting my site as well.

This article seems to be a great add-up to what I wrote, that all religions are based on instinctive faith.

However I do believe praying nuns and meditating monks have similarity; they both cling on something abstract desperately that wouldn’t necessarily feed them. To me, both seem to have same motives - the brain told them to.

To me, religion is just a remnant of a method that was used since ancient times used to justify rights and unify people. It’s sad because today many people who developed different ways of expecting, coping, and trust are not prone to getting along with each other.

soojin

We experience our clothes through our brain - does this mean they don’t exist or are just a belief?

Many diseases have a genetic component - does this mean they aren’t real.

The untangling of ‘perception’ and ‘reality’ is tricky. I think one way forward is to realise that perception is structured.

Science will never be able to prove or disprove the existence of God or any higher power. Isn’t this the cornerstone of faith, after all: a belief that needs no proof? Or perhaps, maybe the proof has been in our brains the whole time.

Science doesn’t prove or disprove anything. It is a probability game. Instead of proves, say “Evidence supports” or “suggests.”

The article you refer to shows only that the transcendental feeling many associate with religion is caused by a malfunction in the brain. Nothing more, nothing less.

The Door To Reality Is No-Mind
The kingdom of God has been preached as if it is always somewhere
else: in time, in space, but always somewhere else — not here and now.
Why has this happened? Why is the kingdom of God not here and now? Why
in the future, or why somewhere else?
It is because of…

Continue reading this entry

The author’s prime mistake is in the first sentence: a misunderstanding of “proof”. Logic begins with certain unproven and unprovable premises; mathematics takes them, and adds others. Such statements may be considered formally “proven” in an absolute sense. However, the relation of any of these absolute propositions to reality is not itself “provable” from these abstractions.

Science begins by assuming that evidence is related to Reality, and proceeds using the tools of logic and math to determine the nature of reality. Scientific theories are thus not “proven” as absolute truths akin to “2+2=4″; however, the Latin root “probare” also means “to test”, and scientific theories are most certainly “proven” in the sense of “tested”. Hypotheses in science are tested by competing against each other for their conciseness in comprehensively describing the data; those which do best are then referred to as “Theories”. This criterion is valid because it may be proven (in the exact mathematical use) that the champion is most likely to give the correct description of reality. (For details, see the paper “Minimum Description Length Induction, Bayesianism and Kolmogorov Complexity” by Paul Vitanyi and Ming Li.) Thus, the proof of science is not an absolute indication of Truth, but an absolute indication of What Is Most Likely Truth.

The question is, is the evidence in our brains evidence of anything outside it?

I honestly really enjoyed reading your post. I felt a little saddened however by the thought that perhaps this could even be a possibility… yet I see your perspective.

Now, that’s not to say that I would ever dismiss my own believes in God, ever. Fact is fact, and the truth of the matter is that the brain is a powerful thing. And if people in religious faiths tend to be smarter, and stronger, then perhaps it shouldn’t be that difficult to except the fact that maybe the rest of us are being left behind a connection that could really be true in the first place. Hence the “religious experiences.”

You first deemed them to be intelligent, so wouldn’t it almost be a little oxymoronic to turn around and call their beliefs unreal, or even crazy? Now, I know you didn’t say that… but I was thinking that based on the fact that person(s) of religious preferences who actually believe with their whole hearts are possibly allowing themselves to ‘make up’ any religious activity, or be “hallucinating” would simply allow me to assume that they were so (crazy that is).

Thus, I go back to the fact that even if God was not real, I would choose rather to live in ignorance, and believe in Him because He is what actually makes life meaningful, whole, and peaceful… like you said. But somehow, even around my hard-headed nature, I know that He does truly exist.

Not simply based on the teachings, the things that I want, or anything, and everything else… but based on the fact of what I see around me everyday. I’m a pretty open minded person… but look around. And think real hard. “In God We Trust,” on our very own currency. God, or some supreme being is mentioned in almost every religion… why in the world would we choose to trust our “history” books but not stories that we’ve all been passed down from generation to generation? Or genealogy lines? How do you know that someone didn’t play around with all of that? What if all of the teachings we have learned in school were all just some brainwashing tactics? This is why we can’t rely on “proof.” Sometimes it is the heart that we must follow and trust… and when you’ve actually reached the part where it trusts, and follows, then it becomes a part of the mind.

In the absence of proof, the best one can do is state, “I don’t know”. Whether or not one decides to look for that proof is an individual decision. Ultimately if the end result of the quest is to hopefully find oneself in the presence of God, then that quest must be a lifelong one…be it 2 weeks or 50 years.

“The wages of sin is death” - whether one chooses to believe the reality of the statement or believes it’s merely a metaphor, it still tastes of a truism.

God is good but the path to him is not an easy one. Satan is evil and the path to him is deliciously marked and easy to walk. Sadly, humans seem to prefer the path of least resistance. That is why there is a reward for taking the tougher road.

This is actually quite a good article.

I liked the part about religiosity being heritable.

My Father and and brother are both atheists and they grew up in Catholic households

My mother, my sister and I are or were heavily involved with religion.

My mother was a Third Order Franciscan

My sister joined a convent briefly as an adult.

I under went several religious conversions from Catholicism to Wicca and spent years practicing Buddhist and Taoist meditation.

It should be pointed out that the potions of the Prefrontal Cortex that light up are somewhat different for those practicing meditation and those people praying. Prayer and meditaiton use different circuits in the same region of the brain.

People who meditate grow a meditation circuit in the brain over time.

Another thing that was not touched upon is the number of people with mental disorders and religious beliefs. Religiosity is in our brains and so are our mental health issues.

How many stories can one dig up by googling incidences of religious filicide? The sheer number of men and women who killed their children because God told them to or because they believed their children to be possessed is appalling.

In studies of parents that kill or torture their children for religious reasons more than half the men and nearly all the women had psychotic or mood disorders.

Along with increased religiosity all the females in my family suffer or suffered from serious mood disorders especially depression.

My mother and sister continue to remain depressed and highly religious

I became more secular and my depression has been gone for years.

The connection in the brain between mental disorders and religious beliefs, religious experiences should be investigated further.

I tend to agree, it really is a brain thing.

All what “words” we have today or would have tomorrow are coined by human beings. Ask the person (??) why he/she coined the word “GOD”, “RELIGION”, “BELIEFS”. If persons linking themselves to major five religious denominations stop believing in ‘Beliefs’ and ‘Faith’, all religions will collapse permanently. This time will never come! Because the religious beliefs are most powerful, more powerful than the scientific proofs of an event.

I am a new comer in this world of quest of spirituality and faith.

I have one question for everyone. Can spirituality remove hunger and poverty from this world ? Can science and scientific quest remove hunger and poverty from this world.

Meditation and prayer comes only after our stomach is full.

Is there destiny for everyone.Fate !

When a child is born-say a healthy one-does he/she knows where he/she is born? USA or Somalia ? With a silver spoon or iron spoon ? No.

Time has come when spiritualists of the world should come together and make a world opinion to atleast feed every one and provide a healthy childhood to all.

Impossible as spiritualists and aethists both cannot unite .

Sujit

Hi Sujit,

Excellent point.

For most people their faith is ethical. The major faiths encourage charity - and most of the founders of them spoke for justice (though this is less encouraged by their modern adherents).

Atheists and spiritualists unite every day to fight these problems. In the NGO’s those who are believers and those who aren’t usually respect each other, however much they disagree.

Meditation and prayer do not only come after our stomach is full. This is directly contrary to the experience of many poor people. It also adopts a materialist mindset, which makes the fighting of poverty pointless (if people are only material what does it matter that they suffer misery?).

I think the problem is the dominance of an economic dogma. That money is the measure of value of all things including exchanges (relationships) and the environment. This degrades people and our relationship to others and our planet. When this faith is dethroned (and money relegated once more to a means to achieve our values, not a value in itself) I think we will be well on the way to ending poverty. This is not utopian - we live in this non-economic way with our family and others we love. We just need eyes to see (a conversion is required: which would be a genuinely religious experience - one which many an atheist has undergone and that some religious people haven’t).

Sujit, actually it’s easier to meditate when your stomach is empty, although I think you were referring more to the debilitating effects of hunger than really to an empty stomach.

But the main point you raise is a good one. When we allow ourselves to be polarized, that is when we are least effective at bringing about good in the world. So when we think “I am an athiest” or “I am religious” and “that other person is not,” we automatically create a barrier that works to sap our ability to cooperate.

I think it’s better to look for what we have in common than to find ways to see each other as different.

religion is a troubling parodox that waist time trying to figure out.

and the only people that can understand this statement understand the theory of the duck

((((like pointillism we look at the painting from afar and it a beautiful masterpiece but if we want to know what makes up this artwork we get closer and all we see is a bunch of random dots in different shads that have to order

or a childhood story, bears don’t talk but yet if you just “let it be” theirs nothing questionable about it.
as children we question allot of thing but we never seem to question the questionable (example: such as why animals in story’s talk)
so if you really think about it anything can be torn apart with one word “why”))))

Our perceptions, emotions, and reactions to the world around us begin at birth, and shape our attitudes and interactions throughout our life.

As a newcomer I would like to say while the futility of trying to evade the idea of an existant Creator is very evident, we will do better to reason, firstly: as human beings why do we exist, why is there an inherent inner ‘craving’ that no amount of material accumulation seems to satisfy, and we constantly seek love and acceptance from those we are in close contact with, and the idea of making a good impression in everything we do and hope to achieve.
my point being, there is no one answer to satisfy the myriads of questions we need answers to, hence the necessity of a personal experience with the Creator of the Universe. He has all the answers. However, this is not at our initiation but at His (this interruption is sometimes called conviction, or a spiritual experience)
From our youth we can attest to there being natural laws written in our mind. we inherently take a bath when we’re dirty or we eat when we’re hungry etc. Also from the inception of man there is this innate negative attributes we become conscious of over a period of time,which when exercised create a negative impact to ourselves and sometimes directly/indirectly to others.
Our perceptions, emotions and responses all depend on an intricate balance or equilibrium clearly apart from man’s production. Man has supernatural interference whether he believes or not, that’s the reality of it. The matter of right and wrong is not a by product of Evolution but a confirmation of the existence of one infinitely greater than any thing or any one we’ve ever known. Listen to Him a bit more He definitely knows what He’s doing.