Comments on: Recent Drug Statistics on Dependence

By: Jon Rhodes

Jon Rhodes — Tue, 21 Oct 2008 20:34:34 +0000

Pot certainly can be addictive. I have seen first hand, on many occasions, people becoming very aggressive when they withdraw from its use. This is not the occasional user. This is the type of user that smokes the drug like people smoke regular cigarrettes – all day every day. Believe me, some simply cannot function without it.

By: Dirk Hanson

Dirk Hanson — Wed, 02 Jul 2008 20:35:24 +0000

Statistical precision notwithstanding, I think the interesting point is that a significant number of people are claiming to be marijuana-dependent. That goes against decades of common understanding, but it’s time to admit that, for people who have addictive propensities, pot can be addictive. The commonality of withdrawal symptoms that abstinent potheads describe also argues in favor of the existence of marijuana dependency among a minority of users.

By: v

Tue, 03 Jun 2008 18:05:19 +0000

This article says absolutely nothing because it does not describe, at all, what the criterion for “drug dependence” is.

In fact, the use of the phrase “in other words” in the following quote implies that anyone who has tried drugs in the last 13-24 months is drug dependent:

The National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) surveyed people who had used a drug for the first time between 13 to 24 months prior, and calls them ‘year-before-last-initiates.’ In other words, it tells us how many of these initiates are currently dependent on the drug (and, of course, this includes alcohol).

By: Nathan Harris

Nathan Harris — Sat, 31 May 2008 02:11:57 +0000

They can’t take into account the aftermath, or the concurrent conditions. It only counts the number of users and the published numbers look low to me.

By: hereafterforever

hereafterforever — Thu, 29 May 2008 20:05:54 +0000

Dependence is measured equally in terms of the user’s physical and mental symptoms during the use of the substance and after the substance use is stopped. In comparison to the physical changes and permanent damage to synapses from alcohol, opiate, and stimulant use, marijuana pales in comparison. I believe that this study fails to account for both the concurrent and aftermath conditions that the user experiences for any of the drugs listed.

By: Carlos Cardona

Carlos Cardona — Tue, 27 May 2008 01:29:09 +0000

What about tobacco. By far more addictive than any of the drugs listed…..

By: Nathan Harris

Nathan Harris — Tue, 27 May 2008 00:44:27 +0000

More people are addicted to prescription drugs then the surveys indicate. They will surpass marijuana use soon enough. The “war on drugs” should start with big pharma.

By: No Extradition for Marc Emery, Michelle Rainey, or Greg Williams « Hempyreumenglish’s Weblog

Mon, 26 May 2008 15:00:06 +0000

[...] Here is my answer to BrainBlogger.. No Comments so far Leave a comment RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI Leave a comment Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed:

[...]

By: HempyreumWeblog HempyreumWeblog — Mon, 26 May 2008 14:46:07 +0000 Thanks for the first comment left on our blog and excuse me for the answer delay, PC problems. Making a general speech, I support in part those who say that marijuana gives psychological dependence and so I admit is possible if the subject makes it possible. Let me explain better: there are people brought to dependency and people, with a conscious use of marijuana, they are even able to draw benefits without the need to abuse it. The statistic is fun, that’s true. Where is the psychoactive medicine dependence? And alcohol? Alcohol dependence is less dangerous than marijuana dependence? I don’t think this. Nobody thinks this, I suppose. Moreover, I believe that should be given more experience and less statistics, if we want to do a service for people, we must be together with people. excuse me still for delay. Sincerely, Valerio Massimo
By: Tony

Tony — Sat, 24 May 2008 19:15:31 +0000

Taken from Substance Use and Dependence Following Initiation of Alcohol or Illicit Drug Use and slightly reworded:
Among persons who initiated use marijuana 13 to 24 months prior to the interview, 42.4 percent had not used marijuana during the past year, 51.8 percent had used marijuana in the past year but were not dependent on marijuana, and 5.8 percent were both using and dependent on marijuana in the past year.
Persons who initiated use of cocaine were examined in two subgroups: initiates of crack and initiates of cocaine other than crack. Approximately 9.2 percent of persons who initiated use of crack initiates were dependent on any type of cocaine in the past year, whereas 3.7 percent of persons who initiated use of cocaine other than crack were dependent on any type of cocaine in the past year (Figure 2).
Nuff said.

By: Alan B. Densky, CH

Alan B. Densky, CH — Sat, 24 May 2008 16:12:31 +0000

The statistics are amusing, but for a person like myself they don’t have much interest or meaning. Especially when you consider that the US Government can make them say anything that they want them to say, depending on their agenda.
What’s more interesting and IMPORTANT to me is the fact that people get involved with illicit drugs by making a decision. And when they make another decision and decide that they are ready to quit the drugs, especially tobacco in its many forms, it’s my job to show them how to accomplish that goal with as little trauma, stress, and withdrawal as possible.
It is my humble opinion, based on 30 years of experience, that 90% of the smoking addiction is mental, and only 10% is physical. It’s also my opinion based on those same 30 years, that since the mind is causing 90% of this addiction, the human mind can cure that same 90%. For this I’ve found hypnotherapy and Neuro-Linguistic Programming to be most effective.