Anybody read what Sharon Begley wrote in the Wall Street Journal about Buddhist meditators and neuroplasticity?
I wonder where HeartMath heart rate variability biofeedback would fit? Mike

Meditating made me realize I was in the wrong profession and that life was too short to waste away doing the wrong thing. I closed my Firm in February and now dedicate myself to online publishing about the benefits of meditation to people like me; overstressed, overworked, personality type A.

I am a firm advocate of meditation being beneficial to reduce anxiety and depression because it has had that effect on me personally. Each day that passes, I become more calm and compassionate and overall a better person.

wholeness and inter-connectedness of things”

as you have so nicely explained it in you article. I also agree that by trying to use meditation as a direct cure, one somewhat lowers the aim of meditation and the results are probably not so good as those which come when really using meditation in the spirit of reaching the highest possible spiritual goals.

Read the abstract . “Our review included any study that was published in a peer-reviewed journal, used a control group, and reported outcomes related to changes in depression and anxiety”

This was not about cardiovascular outcomes. If they had been studying that topic then the study you mention would have been included, subject to meeting the inclusion criteria. As both a meditator and a scientist, this just looks like good review technique to me.

Dr. Schneider cited two studies published in the American Journal of Cardiology in 2005, which demonstrated that individuals with high blood pressure who were randomly assigned to TM groups had a 30% lower risk for mortality than controls. These studies should have been included in the AHRQ report, Dr. Schneider said, but were inexplicably excluded.

Inexplicably? This was a study about the effects of meditation on anxiety and depression, so it seems perfectly appropriate to exclude a study about blood pressure. Honestly! Don’t they teach kids the fundamentals of meta-analysis these days

A controversial new government-funded report, which found that meditation does not improve health, is methodologically flawed, incomplete, and should be retracted.

“Meditation Practices for Health: State of the Research” was a health technology assessment report conducted at the University of Alberta and sponsored by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality and the NIH-National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine. The report was released earlier this month.

Professor Harald Walach of the University of Northampton and School of Social Sciences and the Samueli Institute for Information Biology in England reviewed the paper before its release and strongly urged the authors to withhold publication. “When I looked carefully into the details of the study, the whole analytical strategy looked rather haphazard and ad hoc” Walach said.

Robert Schneider, M.D., F.A.C.C., is one of the leading researchers on the health effects of meditation in the nation. Dr. Schneider has been the recipient of more than $22 million in grants from the National Institutes of Health over the past 20 years for his research on the effects of the Transcendental Meditation technique and natural medicine on cardiovascular disease. He says that relevant findings were excluded from the report, including peer-reviewed studies on the effects of this meditation technique on hypertension, cardiovascular disease, myocardial ischemia, atherosclerosis, changes to physiology, and improvements to mental and physical health.

Dr. Schneider cited two studies published in the American Journal of Cardiology in 2005, which demonstrated that individuals with high blood pressure who were randomly assigned to TM groups had a 30% lower risk for mortality than controls. These studies should have been included in the AHRQ report, Dr. Schneider said, but were inexplicably excluded. In addition, 75 published studies were overlooked, even though these were sent to the authors by one of the reviewers.

Dr. Schneider said the AHRQ report incorrectly analyzed studies and incorrectly rated the quality of the studies while applying statistical methods poorly, arbitrarily, and unsystematically. The report also included errors in collecting data from research studies, in recording data from papers, and in classifying studies. Several peer-reviewers pointed out major errors and inadequacies in the report prior to publication. However, these critiques by outside reviewers were largely ignored. (For critiques of the report, see

Dr. Schneider also cited a study published in the American Medical Association’s journal Archives of Internal Medicine in 2006 — one year after the AHRQ review ended in 2005 — which confirmed that the Transcendental Meditation technique lowers high blood pressure in heart disease patients. The study was conducted at Cedars Sinai Medical Center in Los Angeles and was funded by a $1.2 million grant from the National Institutes of Health.